[Congressional Record Volume 159, Number 140 (Wednesday, October 9, 2013)]
[House]
[Page H6419]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
THE INCONVENIENT INCONSISTENCY OF THE ADMINISTRATION--DEBT LIMIT
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
Texas (Mr. Poe) for 5 minutes.
Mr. POE of Texas. Mr. Speaker:
The fact that we are here today to debate raising America's debt
limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the United
States Government cannot pay its debts. It is a sign that we now depend
on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our
government's reckless fiscal policies.
That was a statement by Senator Barack Obama in 2006.
Driving up our national debt from $5 trillion to $9 trillion is
irresponsible. It is unpatriotic.
Once again, Senator Barack Obama in 2008:
Increasing America's debt weakens us domestically and
internationally. Leadership means that the buck stops here. Instead,
Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices on to the backs of our
children and our grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a
failure of leadership. Americans deserve better. I, therefore intend to
oppose the effort to increase America's debt limit.
Senator Barack Obama, 2006.
But that was then; this is now. The President, last week, said,
without an increase in the borrowing limit, ``the whole world will have
problems.'' In other words, we are all going to die. The sky is going
to fall unless the United States raises the debt limit.
He seems to be a little bit inconsistent on positions regarding the
debt limit. Of course, now the debt limit is up to $17 trillion, double
what he talked about several years ago of not raising.
So we find ourselves in a situation where the President's attitude
seems to be: I will not negotiate, except with the Russians, the
Syrians, the Iranians about what is going on overseas. But I will not
negotiate, I will not talk to the House of Representatives about
American issues.
It would seem to me, Mr. Speaker, that things that are happening in
the United States are really just as important as what is happening in
Russia, Syria, and Iran--but maybe not to the administration.
The administration would rather be in shutdown and lockdown for
political reasons than to talk, to negotiate, to compromise, to even
listen.
You know, Mr. Speaker, they say that Nero fiddled while Rome burned.
It seems that the administration is in bunker mentality while the
United States is in economic turmoil. And where are we? We are in a
situation where there is no talking. And it seems to me, the
administration says it is our fault. The President won't talk to us.
The President has the habit, it seems, to blame others on bad things
that happen and takes credit for things that are always good.
But, in any event, I reemphasize the President's own words about why
we should not raise the debt limit: it is reckless; it is
irresponsible; it is unpatriotic; it hurts us domestically and
internationally; it is a failure of leadership, and Americans deserve
better.
I agree with that.
So since the President seems to be somewhat inconsistent about his
positions, why doesn't he just talk to us? Talk to us about the debt
limit, the continuing resolution, about America's issues, America's
policies, America's problems, and at least acknowledge that the House
of Representatives exists.
So I would suggest, Mr. Speaker, when you get to talk to the
President--because I don't get to talk to him--and suggest that he come
out of the White House and meet with the people's House and quit
fiddling around and start talking to us so we can solve this problem
together.
And that's just the way it is.
____________________