[Congressional Record Volume 159, Number 138 (Monday, October 7, 2013)]
[Senate]
[Pages S7265-S7267]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Government Shutdown
Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I think I have spoken on the floor every
day since this happened. In what has become an all-too-familiar scene
around
[[Page S7266]]
the Capitol over the past few years as we again find ourselves in a
stalemate over providing funding to keep the Federal Government
running. I share the frustration of most Americans--Republicans and
Democrats--that what was once the regular business of Congress, funding
the government, has been replaced by political theater and another
artificial made-in-Congress crisis that might get a number of people on
television, but while doing it, they imperil the economy, and in ways
large and small, every single family in America. It makes no difference
what their politics are, they are in peril.
Of course, there is an easy way to resolve this fabricated crisis.
The House of Representatives could simply vote on the Senate bill. It
is a clean continuing resolution. It has no partisan ideological riders
on the right or the left. It would provide the funding necessary to
keep the Federal Government open through November 15, and Speaker
Boehner could accept the offer Leader Reid made to get on with the
business of negotiating and passing this year's appropriations bills
that should have been passed by the end of last month.
Over the past week, the House has had ample opportunity to end this
shutdown. They could have passed the Senate's legislation to fund all
of the Federal agencies and provide Congress with the time it needs to
find a path forward.
Yet a faction--not the whole House by any means--of extreme House
members, supported by their leadership, have prevented the full body
from voting on the Senate bill. Extreme Republican members--they
certainly don't represent the kind of Republicans we have in Vermont--
have prevented the full body from voting on the Senate bill.
Instead, what do they do? They are all collecting their salaries, but
they closed the government all because they want to erode access to
affordable, private health care options for millions of uninsured
Americans. It is unconscionable, and they have not come up with an
alternative.
They said: We will get rid of a family's option to keep their
college-aged children on their health insurance, but we have no
alternative. We are going to get rid of the ability of spouses who may
have had a preexisting condition, such as cancer or diabetes or a heart
condition, from having insurance. We are going to get rid of that, but
we have nothing as an alternative. We are going to eliminate those
options, for those--who might be low-income persons--to get insurance,
but we have no alternative. We just want to get rid of it.
There is no question that this is a crisis driven by a handful of
partisans on the other side of the aisle for whom there is no path to
compromise on just about anything. Well, there is one exception. They
do find every possible opportunity to get in front of a television
camera and talk about what they have done. The American people ought to
know what they are doing; they are hurting them terribly.
Their demands are both constantly shifting and breathtakingly
unreasonable.
While the Senate has voted on one flawed House proposal after
another, the House refuses to vote on anything from the Senate.
Incredibly, these same extremists--and they are extremists--are now
threatening to employ this same harmful tactic when the Federal
Government reaches its statutory borrowing limit in a couple of weeks.
It is interesting that the Speaker says: We are not going to be able
to do anything on the debt limit. We saw the stock market, which was
projected to be up by 150-to-200 points suddenly go down 150 points.
There was a 300-point swing. In other words, we will continue our
sloganeering and our stalling no matter what that might do to people's
savings for retirement, or their pension, or to their kids in college
or to the small businesses that are trying to make money so they can
stay in business. We don't care what happens to them because we have to
be on the evening news and talk about how we are standing up for
America.
No, they are not standing up for America.
In fact, the Treasury Department reported last week that a failure to
raise the debt limit could cause credit markets to freeze, the dollar
to plummet, and interest rates to rise precipitously. The report goes
on to say a government default on its debts might prove so catastrophic
that it could potentially result ``in a financial crisis and recession
that could echo the events of 2008 or worse.'' They don't seem to care
so long as they get on television.
We have all heard a lot of talk and seen a lot of crocodile tears
about getting our fiscal House in order. Oh, what a great campaign
slogan. But too many who got elected with such bumper sticker
sloganeering are not following through on their constitutional
responsibility to the government.
Look at their list of ransom demands for reopening the government:
The first one blows a $100 billion hole in the national debt by
repealing the Affordable Care Act. The second one adds $30 billion more
to the debt without offering any suggestion for making up the revenue.
The third still keeps important government functions closed, such as
providing food assistance to young children, expectant mothers,
seniors, continuing health trials that could cure cancer or childhood
diseases; and the list goes on and on.
It is truly unfortunate that a relative few Republicans in Congress,
who are obviously enjoying the limelight, are willing to play politics
and brinkmanship at a time when the public demands statesmanship. Their
reckless actions are hurting families all across America. I would
remind them they are hurting Democratic families, Republican families,
Independent families; they are hurting Americans. For this small,
extreme faction, it seems ``compromise'' is a dirty word and
``distrust'' is a political tactic. That may explain why we have heard
excuse after excuse for blocking the budget discipline they so
desperately pled for just a short time ago. They said: Why don't we
pass a budget? Why didn't the Senate pass a budget? I was in the chair
at 5 o'clock in the morning on a Saturday morning when we were voting
on that budget. We voted all day and all night and we finished it. That
was back in March.
So what happens when we want to go to a conference on the budget and
work out the differences with the House? In a conference, if we counted
the number of people, there would be more Republicans than Democrats.
It was a Republican Senator who stood on the floor and said: I object
to going to conference--the same one who was giving speeches asking why
we don't have a budget.
Then, when we pass a budget, we have to go to the next step to work
it out with the House: Oh, no, I object to that. Probably because he
was surprised we had actually done our work. The chairwoman of the
committee, the Senator from Washington, Mrs. Murray, who did such a
brilliant job of getting together a budget that saves the taxpayers
money--they then act terrified that it might actually pass.
They have objected 19 times to go to that budget conference. They
have shut down the government. They are preparing to cause the
government's first ever debt default in our Nation's history. That is
right. The Speaker of the House is now holding the government's credit
hostage, threatening this weekend to let the Nation default come
October 17 when the debt limit is reached unless even more draconian
spending cuts are made. Is there any reason markets all over the world
are dropping? Is there any reason the rest of the world looks at
America and says: What are you doing? Why are you letting the children
in the sandbox take over?
We have caught just a preview of the chaos such a move could create.
Stock futures, as I mentioned, dropped sharply and European stocks
dropped dramatically in the wake of House Republicans' newest
ultimatum. This is no way to govern.
It is also not an example to set for the rest of the world when we
have to go to the rest of the world and say: Help us, work with us, to
stop the terrorists who threaten the United States. Help us, work with
us, so we can export our goods to your country. Help us, work with us
to bring about stability around the world. They say: You will not do a
thing to even help yourself. Why should we help you?
I talked to some of these countries. I talked to the people in those
countries. They are shaking their heads and saying: What has happened
to America?
So it is far past time for reason and sanity to return to Congress,
on this
[[Page S7267]]
government shutdown, on setting our budget priorities, and a whole host
of other issues. Let's let the grownups come back and start running
things around here.
I remain ready to work with people on both sides of the aisle. I am
proud of my record, as the senior-most Member of this body, that year
after year after year legislation I have written with both Republicans
and Democrats as cosponsors has passed. The distinguished Presiding
Officer was Governor of one of the great Commonwealths of this country,
the Commonwealth of Virginia. He brought Republicans and Democrats
together. It was a model for the rest of the country. It can be done,
but it takes grownups to do it. We are always going to have a few loud
voices saying: Oh, we can't possibly do this.
The American public expects the people who truly lead to be leaders.
So let's work with people on both sides of the aisle. Let's find a
solution that ends this needless shutdown and gets us and hundreds of
thousands of Federal employees back to doing our work on behalf of the
American people. That starts with the House voting on the Senate bill
to reopen the American people's government.
That bill is sitting over there right now. Bring it to a vote. Vote
to put Americans back to work and to reopen those trials to find cures
for childhood diseases, or vote no if some wish to continue to be
children in the sandbox.
I am blessed with grandchildren. I like to think none of my
grandchildren would act as childish as a small group of ultra-rightwing
Republicans have in the House. They don't reflect the great tradition
of the Republican Party in my State or in this country. They reflect an
atmosphere of people who care only for themselves. No matter what they
say, they care only for their own egos and their own political future.
It is time they started caring for the United States of America.
I see nobody else seeking recognition. I suggest the absence of a
quorum, and if time is being charged, I ask unanimous consent that it
be charged on both sides.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
The clerk will call the roll.
The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, with nobody else seeking recognition, I ask
unanimous consent that all time be yielded back.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
Without objection, it is so ordered.
The question occurs on the Bruce nomination.
Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I ask for the yeas and nays.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second?
There appears to be a sufficient second.
The question is, Will the Senate advise and consent to the nomination
of Colin Stirling Bruce, of Illinois, to be United States District
Judge for the Central District of Illinois?
The clerk will call the roll.
The assistant legislative clerk called the roll.
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from Pennsylvania (Mr.
Casey), is necessarily absent.
Mr. CORNYN. The following Senators are necessarily absent: the
Senator from Oklahoma (Mr. Coburn), the Senator from Oklahoma (Mr.
Inhofe), and the Senator from Florida (Mr. Rubio).
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Donnelly). Are there any other senators in
the chamber desiring to vote?
The result was announced--yeas 96, nays 0, as follows:
[Rollcall Vote No. 213 Ex.]
YEAS--96
Alexander
Ayotte
Baldwin
Barrasso
Baucus
Begich
Bennet
Blumenthal
Blunt
Boozman
Boxer
Brown
Burr
Cantwell
Cardin
Carper
Chambliss
Chiesa
Coats
Cochran
Collins
Coons
Corker
Cornyn
Crapo
Cruz
Donnelly
Durbin
Enzi
Feinstein
Fischer
Flake
Franken
Gillibrand
Graham
Grassley
Hagan
Harkin
Hatch
Heinrich
Heitkamp
Heller
Hirono
Hoeven
Isakson
Johanns
Johnson (SD)
Johnson (WI)
Kaine
King
Kirk
Klobuchar
Landrieu
Leahy
Lee
Levin
Manchin
Markey
McCain
McCaskill
McConnell
Menendez
Merkley
Mikulski
Moran
Murkowski
Murphy
Murray
Nelson
Paul
Portman
Pryor
Reed
Reid
Risch
Roberts
Rockefeller
Sanders
Schatz
Schumer
Scott
Sessions
Shaheen
Shelby
Stabenow
Tester
Thune
Toomey
Udall (CO)
Udall (NM)
Vitter
Warner
Warren
Whitehouse
Wicker
Wyden
NOT VOTING--4
Casey
Coburn
Inhofe
Rubio
The nomination was confirmed.