[Congressional Record Volume 159, Number 131 (Saturday, September 28, 2013)]
[House]
[Pages H5926-H5927]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
LET'S PASS A SOUND BUDGET
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from New
York (Mr. Tonko) for 5 minutes.
Mr. TONKO. Mr. Speaker, I have one basic question: What are we doing
here? I mean just that. What are we really doing here?
Each day we talk about problems, problems, the real problems that
face our country that are fixable with compromise and clearheaded
solutions. Each day, this Chamber does nothing to overcome those
challenges in front of us. Each day, the American people think we can't
sink any lower or be any more dysfunctional.
Right now, there's talk about passing a 1-week budget to simply
provide the time for elected officials--people charged with running the
government of this great Nation of ours--to get along for enough time
to pass yet another extension. Say it isn't so. One week. There are
lemonade stands with better budgeting practices than what we have seen
in this body in the past 2 years.
This is unacceptable, this is absurd, and it certainly is not what
the American people deserve from any layer of government, especially
their Federal Government. Let's get this done. Let's pass a budget, a
budget that cuts where
[[Page H5927]]
we can, that invests where we must, that grows jobs, and ends the
painful consequences of sequestration.
The absolute misery here is that all of this dysfunction could have
been avoided. We could have avoided the reach to yet another kicking of
the can down the road if we would come together at the conference table
and do a real budget. We could reach through a budget process; we could
reach to regular order.
With many of my colleagues, I have urged them that the leadership in
the House resort to naming the panelists who will sit at that
conference table to realize regular order through a budget process, a
real budget process. That request has been turned down time and time
again. The statements made in the past were, Well, the Senate hasn't
moved on a budget, or We haven't heard from this entity about what
their plans are.
Well, the truth be told, this year, the United States Senate passed
its version of a budget. This House passed its version of a budget. The
President and his administration have advanced their fiscal blueprint
for the coming fiscal year.
{time} 1015
The entities have spoken. The process needs to be addressed and
respected. We need to bring those panelists to the conference table--
those who will represent Republicans and Democrats in the House of
Representatives and in the United States Senate--to come to terms, to
develop the compromise in the spirit by which our Founding Parents
developed this wonderful blueprint of a Republic, guided by the
democracy.
Why are we rejecting that opportunity?
A sound budget could allow us to escape the terrible consequences of
sequestration.
I have witnessed what that sequestration has meant in my own
district. During our 5\1/2\-week district work period, I visited with
many of those Head Start programs, with Early Intervention, with
nutrition programs, with food banks that address the nutrition needs of
the people of this great Nation. I have worked with the small business
community to understand more fully what the impact of sequestration
might mean to them--cuts to research, to programs that have furloughed
my Federal employees if given the opportunity to serve this Nation
through their workforce.
All of that consequential damage could be avoided if we would resort
to the soundness of the tool called the ``budget.'' The sequestration
issue is painful. It's a hidden attack. It's mindless, thoughtless, and
it has pervaded itself into the fabric of our communities--into the
quality of life of the people who place within us the trust to be their
voice in Washington.
So we need to do better than this paralysis that has stalled the
process that finds us at the midnight hour, searching for answers in
the most unusual format that will resort to yet another kicking of the
can down the road, that would use the smoke and mirrors to balance a
budget for some uncertain period of time, that doesn't provide the
predictability to the business community or to the working families of
this Nation. The partnership with their government should be real. It
should be stated in terms that allow for the respect of businesses to
invest and hire and be productive.
We have had a plan in this House coming from the Democrats.
Representative Van Hollen has introduced a plan that will reduce the
deficit in greater fashion and will avoid the painful consequences of
sequestration.
____________________