[Congressional Record Volume 159, Number 119 (Wednesday, September 11, 2013)]
[Senate]
[Page S6381]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                    AMENDMENTS SUBMITTED AND PROPOSED

       SA 1852. Mr. WHITEHOUSE (for himself and Mrs. Boxer) 
     submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the 
     bill S. 1392, to promote energy savings in residential 
     buildings and industry, and for other purposes; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1853. Mr. BARRASSO (for himself, Mr. Enzi, and Mr. 
     Flake) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him 
     to the bill S. 1392, supra; which was ordered to lie on the 
     table.
       SA 1854. Mr. BARRASSO (for himself and Mr. Flake) submitted 
     an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 
     1392, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1855. Mr. FRANKEN submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1392, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1856. Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mr. Hoeven) 
     submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by her to the 
     bill S. 1392, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1857. Mr. RUBIO submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1392, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1858. Mr. WYDEN (for Mr. Merkley) proposed an amendment 
     to the bill S. 1392, supra.
       SA 1859. Ms. STABENOW submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by her to the bill S. 1392, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1860. Mrs. GILLIBRAND submitted an amendment intended to 
     be proposed by her to the bill S. 1392, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1861. Mr. JOHNSON of Wisconsin (for himself and Mr. 
     Coburn) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him 
     to the bill S. 1392, supra; which was ordered to lie on the 
     table.
       SA 1862. Mr. JOHNSON of Wisconsin (for himself and Mr. 
     Coburn) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him 
     to the bill S. 1392, supra; which was ordered to lie on the 
     table.
       SA 1863. Mr. ENZI (for himself, Mr. Barrasso, and Mr. 
     Flake) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him 
     to the bill S. 1392, supra; which was ordered to lie on the 
     table.
       SA 1864. Mr. ENZI (for himself and Mr. Barrasso) submitted 
     an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 
     1392, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1865. Mr. TOOMEY (for himself, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Flake, 
     and Mr. Risch) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed 
     by him to the bill S. 1392, supra; which was ordered to lie 
     on the table.
       SA 1866. Mr. VITTER (for himself, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Heller, Mr. 
     Lee, Mr. Johnson of Wisconsin, and Mr. Inhofe) submitted an 
     amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 1392, 
     supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1867. Mr. COBURN submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1392, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1868. Mr. COBURN submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1392, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1869. Mr. COBURN submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1392, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1870. Mr. COBURN submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1392, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1871. Mr. McCONNELL (for himself, Mr. Coats, Mr. Cornyn, 
     Mr. Coburn, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Barrasso , Mr. Burr, Mr. 
     Risch, Mr. Johanns, Ms. Ayotte, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Moran, and Mr. 
     Hoeven) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him 
     to the bill S. 1392, supra; which was ordered to lie on the 
     table.
       SA 1872. Mr. VITTER submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1392, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1873. Mr. COBURN submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1392, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1874. Mr. COBURN submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1392, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1875. Mr. COBURN submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1392, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1876. Mr. THUNE submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1392, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1877. Mr. BENNET (for himself and Mr. Coburn) submitted 
     an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 
     1392, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1878. Mr. BLUMENTHAL submitted an amendment intended to 
     be proposed by him to the bill S. 1392, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1879. Mr. SESSIONS (for himself and Mr. Pryor) submitted 
     an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 
     1392, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1880. Mr. LEE submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1392, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1881. Mr. PRYOR (for himself, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Begich, 
     Mr. Boozman, Mr. Coons, Mr. Heinrich, Mr. Tester, and Mr. 
     Udall of New Mexico) submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1392, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1882. Mr. INHOFE submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1392, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1883. Mr. INHOFE submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1392, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1884. Mr. INHOFE submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1392, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1885. Ms. LANDRIEU (for herself and Mr. Wicker) 
     submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by her to the 
     bill S. 1392, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1886. Ms. LANDRIEU (for herself, Mr. Wicker, and Mr. 
     Pryor) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by her 
     to the bill S. 1392, supra; which was ordered to lie on the 
     table.

                          ____________________