[Congressional Record Volume 159, Number 119 (Wednesday, September 11, 2013)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6369-S6370]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
WRDA
Ms. LANDRIEU. Mr. President, I would like to speak about an issue
completely separated from the international concerns we all share
because closer to home there was an action taken today by the House of
Representatives that has me extremely concerned as the senior Senator
from Louisiana and a leader in our delegation and is an issue I have
worked on literally since the first day I came to the Senate now almost
17 years ago.
Today, the House of Representatives, unfortunately, in presenting
their WRDA bill, which was a bill that was negotiated at great length
with great skill by Senator Barbara Boxer, the chair of the committee
of jurisdiction, and the ranking member, Senator Vitter, who did an
outstanding job for the country and for Louisiana, negotiated quite
skillfully a bill that was very balanced.
It contained no earmarks, as have been eliminated by the majority of
the Congress. It did give a green light for projects that had received
a positive Chief's report, which is the signal to go forward with the
project for flood protection or navigation or dredging under the
jurisdictions of the Corps of Engineers.
Unfortunately, for unexplained public reasons today, which we will
find out as soon as we can and report, the House of Representatives,
the leadership, decided to drop probably the most important project in
the bill for Louisiana, and that project is Morganza to the Gulf. The
saddest part about all of this, the House removing this project, this
project has already been authorized three times in the last 15 years by
the Senate and twice by the House of Representatives.
The people who would be benefited by this project, about 200,000
people who live in south Louisiana, Lafourche Parish and Terrebonne
Parish, the same area that was battered by Katrina, Rita, Gustav, Ike,
and the oilspill, the same people who have suffered through flood after
flood after flood, the same people who have taxed themselves, gotten
$200 million of their own money to build phase 1, have now been told no
by the House of Representatives.
For what reasons I cannot understand. They have gone through all of
the processes required. They have waited in line, a line that should
never have been there because they were given a yes. But as the
Presiding Officer knows, under the Corps of Engineers' rules, they can
say yes to your project initially and then it takes so long to get to
your project because we have a very inefficient system. If the
estimates then come in at 20 percent over the original estimate, the
law kicks you out and you have to start all over. So they started all
over. That is the tragedy of this action. We were furious they had to
start all over, but that was the law. So they did. They got a positive
Chief's report in June.
The House of Representatives just arbitrarily decides, even with a
positive Chief's report, they are taking Morganza to the Gulf out of
the bill. I am calling on the Louisiana delegation to stand,
particularly members who are in the study committee. I think we have a
leader of that committee, Congressman Steve Scalise, who was my partner
in the RESTORE Act and has been a very able leader in our delegation,
to absolutely put their foot down on this WRDA bill moving any further
in the House of Representatives until we can get justice for this
project.
Our people are doing everything we can to elevate our homes, to fight
for fair flood insurance, to tax ourselves to build levees. We have
traveled all over the world to find the best engineers in the
Netherlands because we do not seem to have enough engineers in
Washington who understand that you can live safely below sea level.
Sometimes you have to because that is where the ports are. We do not
have the luxury of living on tops of mountains. We are running the
Mississippi River. We are not running a ski lodge
[[Page S6370]]
in Vail. So our people have to live there. They are not living in
mansions. They are not living in condos. They are living in fishing
villages and fishing camps and in very middle-class neighborhoods,
trying to make a living for themselves, their families, their
communities and keep this country operating.
We are running the biggest oil and gas operations out of Houma, LA,
the town the House of Representatives has just literally made
defenseless. They have no levees. New Orleans now, after Katrina, and
Jefferson Parish, and Saint Bernard Parish have $14 billion of taxpayer
money invested. That is a lot of money. I know some people in the
country get very aggravated about that. Why did they get $14 billion?
The country should have given us $1 billion 10 years ago and we could
have saved them 14. But the Congress decided not to do that. We asked.
We begged. We pleaded. No. No. No. No. So one day the levees broke.
Then the bill came due. It was a big bill, $14 billion. Wait until the
next bill comes through. In that whole timeframe, that whole timeframe
where our people are begging, drowning, houses going underwater,
begging for help, the government keeps telling us no, no, we sent $161
billion to this Treasury from off our shore, from offshore oil and
gas--$161 billion.
We come up here and try to get $1 billion for this levee, $2 billion
for that. We are told: We cannot afford it. I tell you, I do not have
the power to do this. I do not. But if I did, and if I were the
Governor, I--and I do not think he has the power--but if I could, I
would shut down every rig in the Gulf of Mexico until this Congress
gives the people of Louisiana the money we need to keep ourselves safe
from drowning, from flooding.
I would turn the lights off in Washington and in New York and in
Maine. We are tired of it. The people in our State cannot survive
without levees. The country cannot survive without our people living
where we do, to run the maritime, to run the oil and gas industry.
Houma, LA, does not deserve this. Terrebonne Parish does not deserve
it. Lafourche Parish does not deserve it. Our delegation is not going
to stand for it.
So my message to the Speaker of the House and my delegation in the
House and the House is that bill will never see the light of day unless
Morganza is put back. I do not know who is going to do it or how they
are going to do it.
Please do not tell me there is not enough money. We send alone,
Louisiana--forget Texas, forget Alabama, forget Mississippi--Louisiana
alone every year sends about $5 billion to the Federal Treasury just
from oil and gas severance taxes, not counting sales tax, income tax,
property taxes, other taxes--property taxes would not come here, but
income taxes would come here, corporate income taxes would come here.
That is not even counting that.
I am tired of begging for nickels and dimes. So the House of
Representatives better put Morganza to the Gulf back into that bill.
No. 2, I have not read the whole bill. I was just informed about it. So
I may have to take this back off the record. But I was told also what
they did is say: We are not going to approve projects that had a
Chief's report after our committee meeting in June. Then they put some
language in that says something like: No project can go forward until
they have a committee meeting of the House of Representatives.
So they are basically engaging in earmarks again. In other words,
having voted to take earmarks out--I was not for that. I did not go
along with that, but they did, the leadership of the House, take
earmarks out. They are now trying to put earmarks back in. So the only
way you get back in is if you go through their committee and get your
project approved, which is earmarking in a different way.
So on two fronts I think the House is wrong. I think they were wrong
to take Morganza out, wrong to put this new system in.
The third and final thing I am going to say about this, which is the
saddest thing, because Morganza has to go back in, there are some other
projects they might have taken out that I am simply not aware of. But I
know that the bill that left this Senate was very fair. It was without
earmarks. It was based on the science and the process of the Corps of
Engineers. But to all of my friends in the Senate, even when I get
Morganza back in there, and our delegation does, the problem for all of
us is that there is still going to be $60 billion of authorized
projects for all of our States. The total budget of the Corps of
Engineers next year that Senator Feinstein chairs--and I serve on the
appropriations committee for the Corps of Engineers--will have only
$1.6 billion for new construction.
The total Corps budget is only about $5 billion. So think about it.
Is this not the silliest thing? We have $40 billion of already
authorized WRDA projects. The WRDA bill now has $20 billion minus
Morganza to the Gulf, which they just took out for no good reason,
after 20 years of our people suffering. So they are going to add that
20 plus Morganza which will get back in there. Then we are going to
have $60 billion, and all we have is a few billion to fund it.
It is a system that is so broken and so unfair. Every State feels
this. It is not just Louisiana. What people hear is my strong voice, I
hope, for the people of Louisiana. We feel it the most. We feel it most
frequently just because of our geography. But every community in the
country is suffering from this. We do not have enough infrastructure,
water infrastructure. Our ports are not where they need to be. Our
rivers are not dredged to the depths they need to be. We do not have
enough to maintain our maritime industry in this country.
This is undermining our economic strength and our international
competitiveness, besides being terribly unfair to people who happen to
live along the coast, which is 60 percent of our population. So I am
just sending a little warning signal to the House of Representatives:
There is no way, no way, that this WRDA bill is going to go anywhere
without the Morganza to the Gulf in it. It is not happening. This is
one of those sort of do or die kind of issues for the Louisiana
delegation.
We have waited 20 years for this project. It is justified from every
angle, shape, form. It has been studied to death. The local people have
put up $200 million of their own money. I am not going home to tell
them they are not going to get the project. So I would strongly suggest
our House delegation, particularly our leader Steve Scalise, the
Congressman from Jefferson Parish, who is the chairman of the
Republican study group, go have a long talk with the chairman of the
committee and figure out how to get this project back in the bill.
____________________