[Congressional Record Volume 159, Number 113 (Thursday, August 1, 2013)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6149-S6150]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]



                            The Minimum Wage

  Mr. SANDERS. Mr. President, I rise today to congratulate hundreds and 
hundreds of young people throughout the country who are standing up for 
justice, who are putting a spotlight on one of the major economic 
crises facing this country.
  Today--this week and in recent weeks--we have had young people in New 
York City, in Chicago, in Washington, DC, in St. Louis, in Kansas City, 
in Detroit, in Flint, MI, and other areas around this country who are 
fast-food workers--the people who work at Burger King and McDonald's 
and Popeye's; the ones who give us the hamburgers and the french 
fries--saying that workers all over this country cannot make it on 
$7.25 an hour, $7.50 an hour. Often they are unable even to get 40 
hours of work and, in most cases, they get no or very limited benefits.
  So all over the country these workers, often young people, are 
walking out of their establishments, their fast-food places, and are 
educating consumers about the economic injustice taking place in these 
fast-food establishments. What they are saying is that we need to raise 
the minimum wage in this country; that American workers cannot exist on 
$7.25 an hour, which is the national minimum wage now, or $8 an hour or 
$9 an hour.
  My own view is, at the very least, we should be raising the minimum 
wage to $10 an hour. Just do the arithmetic, with somebody making $7.25 
an hour, and if they are lucky enough to be getting 40 hours a week--
and many workers are not.
  I was in Detroit a couple of months ago talking to fast-food workers, 
and what they are saying is they get 20 hours a week in one place to 
make a living and then they have to work at another place. One young 
man I talked to is working at three separate locations, having to 
travel, in order to cobble together what, in fact, is by far less than 
a livable income. So just do the arithmetic. If you make $7.25 an hour, 
and if you are lucky enough to be working 40 hours a week, you are 
making about $15,000 a year. Then, of course, your Social Security 
taxes are coming out of that and your Medicare taxes are coming out of 
that, and maybe some local taxes. You can't survive on $14,000 or 
$15,000 a year.
  The point is these fast-food workers are educating the Nation about 
the fact that hundreds and hundreds of thousands of people are working 
hard every single day and are falling further and further behind 
economically. We have to stand with them and we have to raise the 
minimum wage in this country.
  While workers at fast-food establishments and other places such as 
Walmart are earning the minimum wage, I should mention that the CEOs of 
these large corporations are, in many cases, making exorbitant 
compensation packages. The CEO of Burger King, a corporation with over 
191,000 mostly low-wage workers gave its CEO Bernardo Hees a 61-percent 
pay raise last year, boosting his total compensation to $6.5 million in 
2012.
  Well, if a millionaire can get a 65-percent pay raise, maybe it is 
time to get a pay raise for the workers who are making $7.25 an hour.
  Last year, McDonald's, a corporation with over 850,000 mostly low-
wage employees, more than tripled the compensation of its CEO Don 
Thompson. In 2011, Mr. Thompson received a mere, paltry $4.1 million. 
But last year, because of his significant raise, the CEO of McDonald's 
received $13.8 million.
  Well, if Mr. Thompson can make $13.8 million as the head of 
McDonald's, surely the workers at McDonald's can make at least $10 an 
hour, not $7.25 an hour, not $8 an hour.

  David Novak, the CEO of Yum! Brands--the owners of Taco Bell, Pizza 
Hut, Kentucky Fried Chicken, and Long John Silvers--was paid $11.3 
million last year and received over $44 million in stock options.
  Well, if this company has enough money to give this gentleman $44 
million in stock options, maybe we can end starvation wages at Yum! 
foods.
  In terms of the minimum wage, since 1968, the real value of the 
Federal minimum wage has fallen by close to 30 percent. The purchasing 
power of the minimum wage has gone down by some 30 percent since 1968. 
If the minimum wage had kept up with inflation since 1968, it would be 
worth approximately $10.56 per hour today.
  The issue our young people working at these fast-food places are 
highlighting goes beyond the fast-food industry. The reality is that 
many of the new jobs being created in America today are low-wage jobs.
  I think we all recognize, even some of my Republican colleagues 
understand, we have made significant economic gains since the collapse 
of the economy at the end of President Bush's tenure in 2008 when we 
were losing 700,000 jobs a month--an unsustainable reality, 700,000 
jobs a month. Now we are gaining jobs, and that is a good thing, but 
not enough jobs. Unemployment remains much too high. Real unemployment 
today is close to 14 percent. But in the midst of understanding the job 
creation process in this country, we need to know that nearly two-
thirds of the jobs gained since 2009 are low-wage jobs that pay less 
than $13.80 an hour.
  So the good news is we are now creating some jobs--not enough jobs; 
unemployment remains much too high--but we cannot lose track of the 
fact that most of the new jobs being created are not paying working 
people a living wage. While most of the new jobs being created are low-
wage jobs, we should remember that nearly two-thirds of the jobs lost 
during the Wall Street recession were middle-class jobs that paid up to 
$21 an hour. So the economic trend is not good. The Wall Street crash 
resulted in mass unemployment, and though we are gaining new jobs, many 
of the jobs we are gaining are low-wage jobs. Yet the jobs we have lost 
are higher wage jobs.
  Also, while we discuss the state of the economy, let us never ever 
forget that middle-class families have seen their incomes go down by 
nearly $5,000 since 1999, after adjusting for inflation.
  Opponents, and there are many--the entire fast-food industry and all 
the big-money interests, the guys who make millions and millions of 
dollars a year, the people who have unbelievable pensions, who have all 
kinds of benefits, the CEOs--are working very hard to tell us in 
Congress not to raise the minimum wage, which is $7.25. Among many 
other arguments they say: Well, if you raise the minimum wage, it is 
going to be a job killer. It will kill jobs.
  Let me say this on a personal basis. I represent the State of 
Vermont. The State of Vermont has the third highest minimum wage in the 
country; it is $8.60 an hour. Meanwhile, with an $8.60-an-hour minimum 
wage, I am happy to say that the State of Vermont has the fourth lowest 
unemployment rate in the United States at 4.4 percent. And to be very 
honest, I have not bumped into many employers who tell me: I would be 
hiring more people if we lowered the minimum wage in Vermont. It does 
not happen. I think that is a bogus argument.

[[Page S6150]]

  The State of Washington, if my memory is correct, has the highest 
minimum wage in the country. Their unemployment rate is lower than the 
national average.
  There is another point I would like to make that needs to be made 
over and over. We talk a lot in this country about welfare reform. I 
think that in general, when people use that expression, what they are 
talking about is lower income people who may be breaking the law and 
taking advantage of programs for which they are not quite eligible.
  Let me say a word about the need for welfare reform but in a somewhat 
different tone, and let me say that the biggest welfare recipient in 
this country happens to be the wealthiest family in the United States 
of America; that is, the Walton family, who owns Walmart, a family that 
is worth $100 billion--more wealth, by the way, than the bottom 40 
percent of the American people. The wealthiest family in America is the 
largest welfare recipient in America. How is that? Well, the reason 
they are so wealthy, the reason that family is worth $100 billion is 
they make huge profits because they pay their workers starvation wages. 
But in order to keep their workers going, the taxpayers of this 
country--through Medicaid, through nutrition programs, through 
affordable housing--give assistance to Walmart so that their workers 
can keep coming to work. So somebody who works at Walmart for $7.25 or 
$8 an hour, more often than not their children are on Medicaid paid for 
by the taxpayers of this country. They and their kids are on food 
stamps paid for by the taxpayers of this country. Many of their 
employees live in affordable housing subsidized by the taxpayers of 
this country.
  So the Walton family becomes the wealthiest family in this country 
while working-class and middle-class taxpayers provide assistance to 
their workers so they can continue going to work. Let me make the very 
radical suggestion that maybe the wealthiest family in America might 
want to pay their employees a living wage so that the taxpayers of this 
country do not have to subsidize them.
  I would conclude by telling those young people in major cities around 
this country that many of us respect and appreciate the courage they 
are showing. It is not easy to walk out of a job when you don't have 
any money, because your employer may say: You are out of here; you are 
fired. But these young people have the courage to stand and say: No. We 
are human beings. We live in the greatest country on Earth. We have to 
earn a living wage. We can't make it on starvation wages.
  So I thank those young people for standing for justice not only for 
themselves but for all Americans, and I hope that Members of Congress 
listen carefully to what they are saying and that we go forward as soon 
as possible in passing a minimum wage that will provide dignity for 
millions of workers.
  Mr. President, I yield the floor, and I suggest the absence of a 
quorum.
  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The clerk will call the roll.
  The assistant bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, it is so 
ordered.
  Mr. REID. Mr. President, we know what is ahead of us the next hour or 
so. I ask unanimous consent that we change that.
  In between the vote on Chen, the judge, and the next vote, I ask that 
there be 10 minutes, and 2 minutes of that would be 1 minute on each 
side, and 8 minutes would be given to the comanager of that bill, Susan 
Collins. That would be for debate only.
  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, it is so 
ordered.