[Congressional Record Volume 159, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 31, 2013)]
[House]
[Pages H5179-H5180]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
Oregon (Mr. Blumenauer) for 5 minutes.
Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Speaker, in a few minutes, we will be meeting
with President Obama here in the Capitol. While I appreciate the
President's commitment to the economy, and I do believe he is
passionate about renewing and rebuilding America, there is a certain
irony to having the conversation today, because this is the very same
day the House is supposed to be completing its work on a woefully
inadequate budget bill to fund Transportation, Housing and Urban
Development.
By insisting on an increase in defense spending and approving a
budget target that is unrealistically low and freezing in the
sequestration, we are seeing budgets that bear no relationship to
reality: $44.1 billion in transportation discretionary appropriations,
down 15 percent from the authorized level. It makes no attempt to deal
with the looming collapse of the highway trust fund; it slashes Amtrak
a third below the current level--hardly responsible.
Many of the budget reductions in the housing programs and the
Community Development Block Grants are even worse. We began those
deliberations on the same day the American Society for Civil Engineers
released their report card on the state of America's infrastructure.
The grade was D-plus. It was
[[Page H5180]]
only that high because we have increased some private investment, some
local government funding and, of course, the reviled stimulus funding
that helped reduce some of the more egregious shortfalls while putting
people to work.
It is ironic that some of the rationale for some of this bizarre
budget behavior, which, thankfully, will never be enacted into law, is
the need to save taxpayer money and reduce deficits.
In reality, if this budget were approved, it would actually end up
costing American taxpayers more. Families will earn even less if we
continue this funding level for infrastructure that is inadequate.
There will be hundreds of millions of hours of time lost as people are
stuck in traffic, and the number of miles of congestion increased over
30 percent. Of course, our businesses will pay almost a half trillion
dollars more in transportation costs and repair while business will be
underperforming, and that will cost money too.
The path forward is clear. We should provide increased funding for
transportation and infrastructure. The gas tax has not been increased
in 20 years, which, incidentally, was the last time we had balanced
budgets. This is the quickest way to get the new revenues that many
feel are necessary to be part of any rational, long-term grand budget
agreement and tax reform.
It would be supported by a wide array of business, labor,
environmental groups, and local government. Indeed, there is a vast
coalition that is saying, tax me so I can do my job better and we can
revitalize America's communities and our sagging economy.
It is no longer acceptable for us to talk past one another. By
dealing boldly with the infrastructure crisis in the context of
realistic budgets and meaningful tax reform, we can put Americans back
to work. We can break the logjam here on Capitol Hill. We can
strengthen the economy while we make our communities more livable and
our families safer, healthier, and more economically secure.
____________________