[Congressional Record Volume 159, Number 93 (Wednesday, June 26, 2013)]
[House]
[Pages H4042-H4043]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
SECURING THE BORDER
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Utah
(Mr. Bishop) for 5 minutes.
Mr. BISHOP of Utah. Mr. Speaker, a great deal has been said about the
border surge over in the Senate. In typical Senate-think, they have
seen a problem and decided to throw money at the problem, even if a
lack of funding is not the problem they are facing.
This map divides the country up into the Border Patrol sectors. The
numbers are from 2010. The numbers are different today but, obviously,
the ratios are about the same. In this year, one has to ask the
question of why were 56 illegal entries apprehended in the main sector
and 200,000 apprehended in the Arizona sector. What was the difference
between those two?
If you were trying to sneak into a baseball game, something I'm not
advocating, but if you were trying to do that, you don't jump over the
turnstile where a cop is standing. You go around the corner and find
the hole in the fence so no one will actually see what you are doing.
The drug cartels are not stupid. They are looking for that hole in the
fence. Obviously, this sector is where the majority of the illegals and
[[Page H4043]]
the illegal drugs and the illegal human trafficking and potential
terrorism exists.
So the question has to be: Why is that the entrance level of choice?
It's actually very simple. Everything that is red is land that's owned
by the Federal Government on this map. In Arizona, 80 percent of the
border is owned by the Federal Government. Over half of that is in the
``Wilderness'' category, ``Endangered Species,'' or ``Conservation
Habitat'' category, where, by special law, the legislation provides
this land a special status which prohibits the Border Patrol from
entering that area. They can't enter in a motorized vehicle. They can't
even pedal a bicycle. They can go into that area on foot, on specially
fed horses, and that is it. The drug cartels recognize this. They're
not stupid. And they realize that this is the problem.
When this Congress insisted a fence be built along the California
border, we passed legislation that waived 40 environmental laws that
were prohibiting the fence from being built. Those same 40 laws are the
laws that prohibit the Border Patrol from going along the red areas of
that border and doing their job, which simply means, as ironic as it
sounds, Federal law is stopping the Federal Border Patrol from going on
Federal land to do a Federal purpose, which is federally stupid. But
this is, indeed, what we're doing.
The Border Patrol actually cares about the environment. Drug cartels
don't at all. This cacti, cut down by the drug cartel, is an endangered
species. It was cut down there to stop east-west access on the only
road that allows the Border Patrol to follow in that particular area.
This truck is a temporary sensor device in a wilderness area. The
Border Patrol wanted to move it from point A to point B. It took them 6
months to get approval by the land manager in that area before they
could back the truck up and move the truck over to another stop because
the land manager was not happy with the Border Patrol being in his
Wilderness territory. And the law was on the side of the land manager,
not on the side of the Border Patrol.
The Senate has tried to say that they're coming up with a compromise
solution to increase border security. In actuality, they have done just
the opposite. They have put language in there that says that the
Homeland Security Secretary can, notwithstanding any other law, require
certain elements to be built in this particular area. But that allows
the Secretary of Homeland Security to have the political discretion of
whether to do it or not. It allows the Secretary of Homeland Security
to have immediate access into these border areas, but only in Arizona.
If they go anywhere else along this border, they have to have the
written approval of the Secretary of the Interior as well as the
Secretary of Agriculture. And most importantly, it says in there that
the manner in which the Homeland Security Secretary shall make these
decisions must be in the manner that best protects the natural and
cultural resources on Federal land.
I'm sorry, but as soon as they put that language in there, it
requires some bureaucrat to establish what the standard is, and it
opens it up to someone else initiating litigation that that is not the
best standard possible. In essence, we're back in a worse situation.
They wish to have another 25,000 Border Patrol agents. This is what
our fence looks like in Arizona today. This is a fence, this is Mexico,
that's Arizona, and the open area is the animal habitat to allow
animals to go back and forth from Mexico and Arizona. The one road on
here is the only road in which the Border Patrol is allowed to go. You
can have another 100,000 agents in that area, and you'll simply find
out that it won't help unless you let them go outside of that one road.
We don't need money. What we need is access. What the Senate is
proposing is actually worse than the status quo.
____________________