[Congressional Record Volume 159, Number 91 (Monday, June 24, 2013)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4987-S4988]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
THE FARM BILL
Mr. REID. Mr. President, I have often said that Speaker Boehner has a
hard job. That was obvious last week when the House Republican caucus
revolted to defeat the Speaker's farm bill. Even though the Speaker
took the unusual step of announcing his support for the measure ahead
of the vote, this bill went down in flames. It was the first time the
House of Representatives has defeated a farm bill since the program was
created in the 1930s.
I admit I was sorry to hear the House Republican leadership blame the
bill's defeat on Democrats, but I was not surprised. They had to blame
someone. They could not blame themselves, even though they should. It
was no surprise that House Democrats opposed this mean-spirited bill.
The legislation would cut $20 billion from the safety net that keeps
millions of Americans, including millions of children, from going
hungry every year. That is what it was about. The farm bill eliminated
8 billion meals for hungry American families and children. That is what
the House bill did. So it is no surprise that Democrats did not vote
for a bill that whacked America's most vulnerable citizens.
We have seen this film before. The Speaker should have known he could
not pass legislation that amounts to a partisan love note to the tea
party. He will be forced to take up a more bipartisan measure. He
should do it now. There is no need to reinvent the wheel. The Senate
has already done the work that was necessary to be done. We passed a
good bipartisan bill. The Speaker should dispense with the drama and
the delay and take up the Senate farm bill now. The bill passed on an
overwhelming bipartisan vote in this Chamber. In fact, it did twice. We
passed it last year. The Speaker refused to bring up the bill in the
House. Passing the Senate farm bill will create jobs, will reduce the
deficit by some $23 billion, and it will make important reforms to both
farm and food stamp programs without balancing the budget on the backs
of hungry Americans.
I spoke over the weekend to Tom Vilsack, the Secretary of
Agriculture. We agreed that maintaining the status quo is not an
option. Doing nothing means no reform, no deficit reduction, and no
certainty for America's 16 million farm industry workers.
I want everyone within the sound of my voice as well as my colleagues
on the other side of the Capitol to know that the Senate will not pass
another temporary farm bill extension. It is time for real reform that
protects both rural farm communities and urban families who need help
feeding their children.
If the Speaker took up the Senate's bipartisan measure, it would
easily pass the House with both Republican and Democratic votes. There
is no shame in passing a bill that moderates in both parties support.
We have seen time and time again that the tea party's ``my way or the
highway'' approach to legislating does not work. The only way to pass a
bill in either the House or the Senate is to do so with votes from both
Democrats and Republicans. The Senate farm bill passed with 66 votes in
this Chamber. It was a perfect example of a bipartisan bill. The
Speaker should allow a vote on this measure in the House now--today.
The immigration bill before the Senate is another example of
bipartisan legislation. The immigration bill will pass this Chamber
with Democratic and Republican votes. When the immigration bill passes,
the Speaker should quickly bring it up for a vote in the House of
Representatives.
So I say, Mr. Speaker, rather than twisting the arms of tea party
extremists, work with moderates in both parties to pass bipartisan
legislation. Mr. Speaker, rather than trying to force legislation
designed to please only the
[[Page S4988]]
right wing, you should take away the obstacles we have and take the
easy way out, actually. Do the right thing. Seek votes from Democrats
and Republicans. America deserves the commonsense approach. That is
what we used to do. We should do it once again.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Ms. Hirono). The clerk will call the roll.
Mr. REID. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. REID. Madam President, what is the pending business?
The PRESIDING OFFICER. We are currently in leader remarks. No bill is
currently pending.
Mr. REID. I would ask the Chair to close morning business and move to
whatever the business of the day is.
____________________