[Congressional Record Volume 159, Number 83 (Wednesday, June 12, 2013)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4353-S4354]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
ASIAN POLICY
Mr. CARDIN. Mr. President, this past weekend President Obama met with
President Xi of China in California for a summit meeting between the
two leaders. It was an opportunity for a personal relationship between
the leader of China and the leader of the United States in order to
improve the trust between the two countries.
China is important to the United States. China, as we know, is a
permanent member of the Security Council of the United Nations--a key
player in developing international policies that are important to the
United States and global security. China is very influential in the
policies concerning North Korea and Iran. China is a key trading
partner of the United States. We know the amount of products that go
back and forth between China and the United States.
President Obama has correctly identified Asia as a region of
particular interest. He has rebalanced Asian policy because of the
importance of Asia to the United States. We are a Pacific power, and
Asia is critically important for regional security as well as for
global security.
I have the opportunity of chairing the Subcommittee on East Asian and
Pacific Affairs of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. In that
capacity, 2 weeks ago I visited China, the Republic of Korea, and
Japan.
In China, I was able to observe firsthand the progress that is being
made in that country and to meet with key leaders of the Chinese
Government. I did see much progress. I saw economic change in China as
to how they are becoming a more open society from the point of view of
entrepreneurship. I saw rights that have been advanced. People do have
more freedom than they had several decades ago.
I saw an opportunity where the United States and China could build a
stronger relationship between our two countries. It starts with
building trust. There is a lot of mistrust out there. That is why I was
particularly pleased about the summit meeting this past weekend. We
have common interests. China is critically important to the United
States on making sure the Korean Peninsula remains a nonnuclear
peninsula. China has tremendous impact over North Korea and does not
want to see North Korea continue its ambition to become a nuclear
weapon power. They can help us in resolving that issue, hopefully in a
way that will help us in a peaceful manner.
I could not help but observe when I was in Beijing that China has a
huge environmental challenge. The entire time I was there, I never saw
the Sun, and that was not because of clouds, it was because of
pollution, which is common in Beijing. It is not only a problem that
China needs to deal with, it is a political necessity. The people of
China know that their air is dirty. Here is an opportunity for the
United States, working with China--the two large emitters of greenhouse
gases--for them to come together and show international leadership by
what we can do in our own countries to encourage progress but also
international progress on this issue.
While I was in China, I had a chance to advance areas of concern. I
want to talk about that. Our security interests with China go toward
their military, yes, but also go toward their economic conditions and
their respect for human rights. I raised throughout my visit to China
my concern, and I think America's concern--the international concern--
about China recognizing universally accepted human rights. The right to
dissent is not there in China.
On June 4 we celebrated another anniversary of Tiananmen Square,
where the student protest turned very deadly. It is still dangerous to
dissent in China. Civil rights lawyers can lose their right to practice
law and can be physically intimidated if they are too aggressive in
representing those who disagree with government policies.
China has a policy to this day of detaining people, putting them in
prison for their ``reeducation.'' That could be for up to 4 years
without trial and without being questioned as to why they are being
detained, solely because
[[Page S4354]]
they disagree with the government's policy.
If you are born in a community, you are registered in that community.
There may not be economic opportunity there for you. You might want to
move to a big city in order to explore additional economic
opportunities for yourself and your family. In China that is not
possible for the great majority of the people. They are registered in
their community, they are expected to live in their community, and they
are expected to work in that community. So you have the haves and the
have nots. There are many people in China who are doing very well. The
vast majority are not.
Then there is the issue of religious freedom. I think we all know
about Tibet and the Buddhists in Tibet and how they have been harassed.
We know about the Uighers and the Muslim community. What really shocked
me was talking to the Protestants who have their house churches. They
explained to me that if their churches get too big--maybe over 25 or 30
members--they lose their right to meet. The government is worried about
too many people getting together to celebrate their religion. Well,
that certainly is unacceptable. It violates internationally recognized
human rights standards.
And then they block access, full access, to the Internet. Sites such
as the New York Times or Bloomberg are considered to be too difficult
for the Chinese people to accept, and the government blocks those
sources.
Perhaps one of the most difficult challenges China has today is that
it does not trust its own people to innovate and create. Instead, they
use cyber to try to steal our rights, our innovation, not just in
America but throughout the world. We are very concerned about the
proper use of protecting intellectual property, and I raised that
during my visit to China.
We are also concerned about the cyber security issues, and I know
that was on the agenda of President Obama and President Xi. We would
urge progress to be made on acceptable standards on the use of cyber.
Then there is the issue of corruption. Because so much is determined
by where you live and your local government, corruption is widespread.
That needs to be changed.
So these are important subjects that we raised in a country that is
critically important to the United States, but these issues must be
debated.
When President Park was here, the President of the Republic of Korea,
she mentioned on the House floor to a joint session of Congress that
she wants a security dialog in Northeast Asia. When I met with her when
I was in Seoul, we had a chance to talk more about it. The more she
talked about the security dialog, the more it reminded me of the
Helsinki Commission, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in
Europe, which was established in 1975 as a security dialog between all
the counties of Europe, now Central Asia, the United States, and
Canada.
That security dialog deals with all three baskets of concern. Yes, we
are concerned about military actions. We have serious military issues
that we need to take up in the northeast. Maritime security issues are
very much of concern to all the countries of Northeast Asia. But we
also need to deal with economic freedom and opportunity, and we need to
deal with human rights.
This type of a dialog would allow us in the north to participate with
the major countries in Northeast Asia to work out and know the concerns
of each of the countries. It would include not just China and the
Republic of Korea but Japan, North Korea, the United States, and
Russia.
I would urge the region to either adopt a security dialog similar to
the Helsinki process or look at becoming a part of the Helsinki
process. We do have regional forums. There is a regional forum for
Asia. So it is a possibility that they could actually work under the
Helsinki framework.
In my visits to Japan and the Republic of Korea, I know we have two
close allies. Japan, of course, is a treaty ally. We have U.S. troops
both in Korea and Japan. We are working out ways to make our troop
presence more effective, consistent with the political realities of
both of those countries.
Both Japan and the Republic of Korea strongly support our policies in
Iran and Afghanistan and the Korean Peninsula. The relationship between
these two countries must improve. There are serious issues. Of course
the comfort woman issue during World War II is a matter of major
concern to the Korean population. I certainly support and understand
that. But it is important for those two allies of the United States to
become closer allies and to move forward in areas of mutual interest. I
urge them to do that.
In Japan, I had meetings on the economic issues, on the Trans-Pacific
Partnership, TPP, which clearly are areas where we can make
advancements. I saw an opportunity to advance U.S. interests in the
rebalance to Asia. It is not a pivot to Asia. We used that term
originally. It is not. We have been active in Asia for centuries. It is
a rebalance because we recognize the importance of Asia. I think we can
do that by enhancing our relationship with all the countries in Asia.
It is an opportunity to advance U.S. security interests through
military cooperation.
I did talk about the military in China. I also talked, particularly
in Japan, about more of their students coming here to the United States
to advance good governance and economic relationships, and to have a
responsible environmental program.
The subcommittee I chair has already held two hearings on the
rebalance to Asia, including good governance and military issues. We
are going to hold future hearings dealing with the environmental issues
and economic issues.
Clearly, working with the President, I see a major opportunity to
advance U.S. interests through our rebalance to Asia policies.
____________________