[Congressional Record Volume 159, Number 83 (Wednesday, June 12, 2013)]
[House]
[Page H3294]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
THE SPYING DRONE OVER A VIRGINIA NEIGHBORHOOD
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
Texas (Mr. Poe) for 5 minutes.
Mr. POE of Texas. Mr. Speaker, last week, just after suppertime in a
neighborhood in McLean, Virginia, a 14-year-old girl--we'll call her
Sarah--was jumping on a neighbor's backyard trampoline. Suddenly, Sarah
heard a noise and looked up, only to see a low-flying object hovering
overhead. It was a small, remote-controlled flying object. It was a
drone. It had a blinking red light coming from it.
The object hovered over her for about 10 minutes. She began to get
real nervous and uneasy. So she jumped off the trampoline and ran home
to tell her parents, but the flying object continued to follow her. She
told her mother. So her mother walked outside into the street and
observed the flying object. Suddenly, the object moved away into
another neighbor's backyard, where three other teenage girls were
sitting in the pool. The small drone hovered over them momentarily,
then it moved away.
The police were called. They arrived at the scene and told the
citizens: ``Sorry, there's nothing we can do.'' Mr. Speaker, this
sounds like something out of a sci-fi movie--someone up to no good
spying on teenage girls with a drone.
Mr. Speaker, drones are easy to find and easy to obtain. With a
simple Google search, you will find out that one can buy a drone on
eBay or go down the street and buy one at Radio Shack.
According to the FAA, the group that monitors and issues permits for
drones, by 2030, there will be 30,000 drones cruising American skies--
looking, observing, filming, spying, and hovering over America. We will
not know who they are, what they're up to, what they're looking at, or
what their purpose is, whether it's permitted or really not permitted,
whether it's lawful or unlawful. And we won't know who's flying those
drones.
There are legitimate uses for government and private citizens for the
use of drones, but a nosey neighbor or snooping government should not
be able to spy on citizens without legal guidelines.
As technology changes, Congress has the responsibility to be
proactive and protect the Fourth Amendment right of all citizens--``The
right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and
effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
violated.'' Thus sayeth the Constitution.
Nowadays especially, Americans are concerned about their Fourth
Amendment rights being taken away. Well, no kidding. The right of a
reasonable expectation of privacy is a constitutional right. The
general rule is snooping, spying, surveillance, or eavesdropping goes
against the basic rights outlined in the Constitution. That is why I
have introduced the Preserving American Privacy Act, along with
Representative Zoe Lofgren from California.
Congress must be proactive in protecting the rights of civilians from
private use and government use of drones. This legislation balances
individual constitutional rights with legitimate government activity
and the private use of drones. The bill sets forth clear guidelines,
protects individual privacy, and informs peace officers so they will
know what they can and cannot do under the law.
There will be limits on government use of drones so that the
surveillance of individuals or their property is only permitted or
conducted when there is a warrant based on probable cause, as the
Constitution requires.
Of course there will be exceptions. They are called exigent
circumstances, which is already in our law, and these will apply, as it
does now, regarding search and seizure. Those exceptions include fire
and rescue, monitoring droughts and floods, assisting in other
emergency cases, or to chase a fleeing criminal.
The bill also allows for the use of drones for border security. The
bill also sets forth guidelines for the private use of drones.
Basically, private citizens cannot use drones to spy on others without
consent of the landowner or that person.
Congress has the obligation to set forth guidelines, to secure the
right of privacy, and protect citizens from unlawful drone surveillance
while maintaining lawful private and government use.
Drone laws are needed because a Peeping Tom should not be able to spy
on young girls who are in the privacy of their backyards just because
the Peeping Tom has the ability to do so.
And that's just the way it is.
____________________