[Congressional Record Volume 159, Number 82 (Tuesday, June 11, 2013)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4214-S4215]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
By Mrs. FEINSTEIN:
S. 1136. A bill to authorize the extension of preferential tariff
treatment for certain textile goods imported from Nicaragua; to the
Committee on Finance.
Mrs. FEINSTEIN. Mr. President, I rise today to introduce legislation
to extend a critical textile and apparel trade program with Nicaragua,
currently set to expire at the end of 2014 through the end of 2024.
This is a unique program which benefits not only Nicaraguan apparel
factories and U.S. apparel companies and retailers, but U.S. fabric and
yarn mills as well.
Let me explain.
In an effort to promote trade between the United States and
Nicaragua, the 2006 Central American Free Trade Agreement, CAFTA,
allows Nicaragua to export to the United States a limited amount of
apparel products duty free regardless of the source of the yarn or
fabric.
Specifically, this Tariff Preference Level, TPL, allows Nicaragua to
export 100 million square meter equivalents, SMEs, of apparel made with
fabric from non-CAFTA countries as long as the apparel is assembled in
Nicaragua.
In order to ensure that U.S. fabric producers could also take
advantage of this program, it contains a special rule for trousers.
It requires Nicaragua to purchase one square meter of U.S. fabric for
every one square meter of non-CAFTA woven trouser fabric.
That is, under this ``one for one'' rule, for each export of woven
trousers made from non-CAFTA fabric, Nicaragua agreed to export to the
U.S. an equal amount of woven trousers made of U.S. fabric, up to a
certain level 50 million square meter equivalents.
This ``one for one'' feature has been especially successful,
resulting in an increase in U.S. fabric exports to Nicaragua and an
increase in apparel production jobs in Central America.
In fact, since 2006, when the program went into effect, U.S. fabric
exports to Nicaragua have nearly doubled from $57.3 million to $110.2
million.
Nicaragua is now the fastest growing market for U.S. fabric exports
to the CAFTA region.
Nicaragua has also greatly benefited from this program.
I would remind my colleagues that Nicaragua, with a GDP per capita of
$3,300, is the poorest country in Central America and the second
poorest country in the Western Hemisphere.
Approximately 42.5 percent of Nicaragua's population lives below the
poverty line.
It is vital that Nicaragua develop and grow new export opportunities
to help lift its people out of poverty. And that is what this program
has done.
Since 2006, total apparel exports from Nicaragua to the U.S. have
doubled. The program now accounts for 25 percent of those exports.
Between 2005 and 2013, jobs in the apparel sector in Nicaragua have
grown
[[Page S4215]]
by 23 percent. That is, 13,236 new jobs have been created since CAFTA
went into effect.
With a program that has proven to be so successful and mutually
beneficial, it is appropriate for Congress to extend it and ensure that
these benefits continue.
Some of my colleagues may wonder why I am introducing legislation now
to extend a textile and apparel trade program that will not expire
until the end of 2014.
The simple answer is that an early renewal is critical for business
planning purposes.
U.S. companies that have taken advantage of this program are making
decisions now about their long-term investments and where they will
source apparel products.
Extending this program several months before its expiration date will
help give U.S. companies the necessary confidence to continue to invest
in Nicaragua and take advantage of its benefits.
If we wait until the last minute to extend the program, the ties that
have been developed between U.S. and Nicaraguan companies and the
benefits accrued will be put at risk.
Simply put, U.S. companies will not make the commitments to Nicaragua
if there is a chance the textile and apparel trade program will lapse.
They will look elsewhere for new business opportunities to avoid what
would in essence be a new trade barrier to U.S. textile exports and
U.S. apparel companies in Nicaragua.
And as U.S. apparel orders from Nicaragua decline, U.S. textile
exports to Nicaragua will also decline. Jobs will be lost.
U.S. companies are looking for assurances that the U.S. is committed
to this program after 2014 and that is why this legislation is needed
now.
It is supported by the American Apparel and Footwear Association, the
National Retail Federation, the Retail Industry Leaders Association,
and the United States Association of Importers of Textile and Apparel.
It is a win-win trade program promoting jobs and economic growth in
both countries.
Nicaragua will be able to continue to develop a vital export industry
and U.S. apparel companies, retailers, and textile manufacturers will
continue to access a growing, thriving market in Central America.
I urge my colleagues to support this legislation.
______