[Congressional Record Volume 159, Number 79 (Thursday, June 6, 2013)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3976-S3977]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
MOTION TO PROCEED--S. 1003
The PRESIDING OFFICER. There will now be 2 minutes of debate equally
divided.
Who yields time?
Mr. HARKIN. Parliamentary inquiry: What bill are we on right now?
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senate is under debate time prior to a
vote on the motion to invoke cloture on S. 1003.
Mr. HARKIN. As I understand, there is 1 minute on each side?
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Two minutes equally divided.
Mr. HARKIN. Mr. President, I will claim our first minute, obviously.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Iowa.
Mr. HARKIN. Mr. President, the bill before us now, like the House GOP
bill, fails the first policy test of do no harm. It is worse for
students over the long term than if we even let the rate double. These
are CBO projections. If we, again, adopt the next bill which leaves the
interest rates at 3.4 percent--that is this sign here--that is what
students would pay in interest. If we let it double--this is the white
line. If we adopt the Republican bill, as you can see, in 2 years
students will be paying more over the next 10 years in interest rates
than if we even let it double.
Here is the bottom line on it: If we keep the rates at 3.4 percent, a
student
[[Page S3977]]
who starts college next year, goes for 4 years, borrows the maximum of
$19,000, will pay $3,510 in interest over 10 years. That is the life of
a Stafford loan. If we adopt the Republicans' bill, that same student
borrowing that same amount of money will pay $6,590 in interest over 10
years. This is the worst possible approach. You shouldn't reduce the
deficit on the backs of students who can't even discharge this in
bankruptcy.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator's time has expired.
The Senator from Tennessee.
Mr. ALEXANDER. Mr. President, I urge a ``yes'' vote because this is a
permanent solution for 100 percent of the student loans. It reduces
rates for every single student's new loan. It has no profit on the
student. It fixes the rate for the time of the loan, and it is the same
idea as already passed by the House. It is the same idea as supported
by the President's budget. There are only minor differences between the
President, the House, and this proposal. If we can't agree on this, we
can't agree on anything.
This is a manufactured crisis. Their proposal is a short-term
political fix for 40 percent of the loans. This proposal is a permanent
solution for 100 percent of the loans that would lower rates to below 5
percent; the same idea as in the President's budget, the same idea as
passed by the House. I urge a ``yes'' vote.
Cloture Motion
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The cloture motion having been presented under
rule XXII, the clerk will report the motion to invoke cloture.
The bill clerk read as follows:
Cloture Motion
We, the undersigned Senators, in accordance with the
provisions of rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate,
do hereby move to bring to a close debate on the motion to
proceed to S. 1003, a bill to amend the Higher Education Act
of 1965 to reset interest rates for new student loans.
Mitch McConnell, John Cornyn, Lamar Alexander, Kelly
Ayotte, David Vitter, Thad Cochran, Orrin G. Hatch,
John Thune, Rob Portman, Lisa Murkowski, Michael B.
Enzi, John Barrasso, John McCain, Roger F. Wicker, Roy
Blunt, Johnny Isakson, Daniel Coats.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. By unanimous consent, the mandatory quorum
call has been waived.
The question is, Is it the sense of the Senate that the debate on the
motion to proceed to S. 1003, a bill to amend the Higher Education Act
of 1965 to reset interest rates for new student loans, shall be brought
to a close?
The yeas and nays are mandatory under the rule.
The clerk will call the roll.
The bill clerk called the roll.
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from Missouri (Mrs.
McCaskill) is necessarily absent.
Mr. CORNYN. The following Senator is necessarily absent: the Senator
from Indiana (Mr. Coats).
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Are there any other Senators in the Chamber
desiring to vote?
The yeas and nays resulted--yeas 40, nays 57, as follows:
[Rollcall Vote No. 142 Leg.]
YEAS--40
Alexander
Ayotte
Barrasso
Blunt
Boozman
Burr
Carper
Chambliss
Coburn
Cochran
Collins
Corker
Cornyn
Cruz
Enzi
Fischer
Flake
Graham
Grassley
Hatch
Heller
Hoeven
Inhofe
Isakson
Johanns
Johnson (WI)
Kirk
McCain
McConnell
Moran
Murkowski
Portman
Roberts
Rubio
Scott
Sessions
Shelby
Thune
Vitter
Wicker
NAYS--57
Baldwin
Baucus
Begich
Bennet
Blumenthal
Boxer
Brown
Cantwell
Cardin
Casey
Coons
Cowan
Crapo
Donnelly
Durbin
Feinstein
Franken
Gillibrand
Hagan
Harkin
Heinrich
Heitkamp
Hirono
Johnson (SD)
Kaine
King
Klobuchar
Landrieu
Leahy
Lee
Levin
Manchin
Menendez
Merkley
Mikulski
Murphy
Murray
Nelson
Paul
Pryor
Reed
Reid
Risch
Rockefeller
Sanders
Schatz
Schumer
Shaheen
Stabenow
Tester
Toomey
Udall (CO)
Udall (NM)
Warner
Warren
Whitehouse
Wyden
NOT VOTING--2
Coats
McCaskill
The PRESIDING OFFICER. On this vote, the yeas are 40, the nays are
57. Three-fifths of the Senators duly chosen and sworn not having voted
in the affirmative, the motion is rejected.
____________________