[Congressional Record Volume 159, Number 78 (Wednesday, June 5, 2013)]
[House]
[Pages H3103-H3104]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
COMPETITIVE BIDDING FOR CMS SERVICES
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
Pennsylvania (Mr. Thompson) for 5 minutes.
Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania. Mr. Speaker, today I rise to address a
situation that is evolving within this Nation where older adults on
Medicare who have the misfortune of experiencing disease or disability
and require durable medical equipment, equipment that is designed to
allow people to live with dignity and independence in their own homes,
we're seeing, through the actions of CMS, through Medicare, of
preventing their access.
Medicare is awarding contracts to companies who are not even licensed
in States to do business. In the end, it's going to cause a terrible
disconnect with people being able to access the equipment that they
need.
And not just the equipment. I spent 30 years working rehabilitation
services as a therapist, rehab manager, and as a licensed nursing home
administrator. I saw what difference this equipment makes, but also
what the service makes, the technical assistance means for people who
are living at home on oxygen or using wheelchairs or other types of
medical equipment.
In the evenings, I actually was a volunteer EMT and firefighter; and
frequently I'd find myself in the middle of the night, pager would go
off and I'd be out in the community, in neighbors' homes, and be able
to witness firsthand how important that equipment is there.
This week the National Association for the Support of Long Term Care
and its members are in Washington to represent ancillary providers of
products and services in the post-acute care industry. Now, as part of
this work, these individuals will be garnering signatures on a letter
that calls on CMS, Medicare Administrator Tavenner, to delay
implementation of the widely criticized Medicare Durable Medical
Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics and Supplies Competitive Bidding
Program.
Now, this competitive bidding program--and believe me, it was
misnamed when it was passed; there's nothing competitive about it--was
intended to reduce Medicare costs, ensure that beneficiaries have
access to quality services. In practice, the system denies competition
while worsening access to quality goods and services and harming
seniors.
In many ways, their mission today in Washington reminds me of one of
my favorite movies, and a piece of our history in this country, the
Apollo 13 mission. The story of Apollo 13 is that what could have been
the worst space disaster in history became one of NASA's most
spectacular conquests.
Everything had gone wrong. An oxygen tank exploded in the service
module, damaged a nearby oxygen tank, and rocked the command and lunar
modules. Mission controllers struggled to isolate the problems, with no
success. The mission and the astronauts' lives were in jeopardy.
To conserve power, the astronauts had shut all of the spacecraft
systems down except the radio. The carbon dioxide rose to toxic levels,
and crew members managed for 6 days with hardly any food, water, or
sleep in freezing temperatures. There was clear danger the astronauts
might not survive, but they did.
Apollo 13 Flight Director Gene Kranz famously rallied his team to do
what is necessary to get the astronauts home safely, declaring
``failure is not an option.''
One of NASA's greatest achievements had become not the next feat in
space exploration, but the brilliant rescue of crew members aboard
Apollo 13.
Similarly, when it comes to competitive bidding, failure is not an
option. CMS' competitive bidding is our damaged spacecraft. Individuals
in need of durable medicine equipment for prosthetics or orthotics are
the flight crew. They are in danger. We need competent technical
support professionals working together to achieve our mission and bring
this crew home safely.
After years of bureaucratic delay and mismanagement, we're no closer
to a system that works for both providers and beneficiaries--that would
be the seniors of our Nation.
Now, it appears providers are being awarded contracts by CMS to
provide services for round two competitive bidding that lack the
required licensing or accreditation for specific States in which
they're supposed to service those seniors.
I'm extremely concerned that mishandling of the bidding process is
going to have a devastating impact on beneficiaries. This is a serious
issue that warrants a full review of the process and a delay of round
two until this fatally flawed program is fixed.
For this reason, I encourage my colleagues to sign on to this letter
to Administrator Tavenner requesting a delay through the end of the
year so that we can have more time to review how round one was
implemented and fix the problems that exist with the administration of
the program.
I'm proud to say that, as of today, we have 129 signatures from
Members of the House of Representatives; and I encourage my colleagues
who have not taken the opportunity to sign on to the letter to do so
today.
We need to replace this fatally flawed program with one that's not
just labeled competitive, but is competitive
[[Page H3104]]
and maintains beneficiary access to durable medical products and
quality services.
____________________