[Congressional Record Volume 159, Number 74 (Thursday, May 23, 2013)]
[Senate]
[Page S3794]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
UNANIMOUS CONSENT AGREEMENT--EXECUTIVE CALENDAR
Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the
cloture vote scheduled for Executive Calendar No. 95 be vitiated;
further, the Senate proceed to executive session at 1 p.m. today for
the consideration of Calendar No. 95; there be 1 hour of debate equally
divided in the usual form, and at the use or yielding back of time, the
Senate proceed to a vote on the confirmation of the nomination with no
intervening action or debate, and that the President then be notified
of Senate's action.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
Mr. REID. Mr. President, reserving the right to object.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The majority leader.
Mr. REID. Mr. President, I am not going to have a long conversation
this morning with my friend the Republican leader, other than to say
this: My speech speaks for itself. I wrote it; no one else wrote it. It
is my speech, and I want everyone to look at that. I want Republicans
and Democrats to look at it.
I also want the record to be clear: This man, on whom we are going to
vote this afternoon at 1 p.m. or 2 p.m.--whatever time the consent
agreement suggests--has been waiting 1 year. So the Republican leader
can talk about how quickly it came, but this man has been waiting for a
year. I went through the statistics, and I will not go over them again.
I hope things work out in this Senate so we don't have to go through
anymore procedural battles, but things are not working well. I went
through the statistics, and they are in my speech.
I don't object.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
The Republican leader.
Mr. McCONNELL. Let me make sure everybody understands where we are.
Let's have no misunderstandings. What the majority leader is doing is
trying to get 51 votes to break the rules of the Senate and change the
rules of the Senate. We know what he is doing, and let's make no
mistake what the stakes are: He is threatening this institution, which
he elected, in part, to protect, by manufacturing a crisis that does
not exist. As we all know, in the Senate every Senator has the ability
to impact how we do business. Unanimous consent means exactly what it
says, unanimous consent.
I hope the majority leader will think long and hard, and I hope my
friends in the majority, who may some day be in the minority--I know
there are a lot of new Democratic Senators who think that will never
happen, but amazingly enough the American people do, from time to time,
change their minds about who they want running the country. The shoe
could be on the other foot, and we never know when. I could have the
job the majority leader currently has.
I think we need to think long and hard about protecting this
institution and its traditions, particularly manufacturing crises when
they don't exist.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The majority leader.
Mr. REID. Mr. President, prior to coming to Congress, I was a trial
lawyer. I tried more than 100 cases to a jury. The jury decided what
was right or wrong in the particular conflict, and I have the American
people on my side with this conflict. They don't like what is going on
in the Senate, and I have an obligation to protect the Senate. I know
that, and my friend reminds me of that, and I think of it very often. I
think of it every day and when I have my weekly caucus with my 54
Democratic Senators. I represent them to represent the people they
represent. I represent, because the people they represent are
Republicans, Democrats and Independents, and I understand that.
So I am willing to take this case to the American people. I hope we
can resolve any problems we have, but it is not right what is going on.
I submit my case to the American people. I submit my case to the
American people.
I don't know what he is talking about. I had a very early meeting
this morning. I haven't read the newspaper. Maybe there is something in
there I will have to deny. I don't know anything about the 51 votes. I
look for 51 votes all the time on many different issues.
As I said, I don't want to have any animosity between me and my
friend. He is a lawyer. I am a lawyer. He represents Kentucky. I
represent Nevada. We both represent our respective caucuses and we both
have an obligation to make this place work better.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Republican leader.
____________________