[Congressional Record Volume 159, Number 68 (Wednesday, May 15, 2013)]
[House]
[Pages H2607-H2608]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                             SEQUESTRATION

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from 
Maryland (Mr. Hoyer) for 5 minutes.
  Mr. HOYER. Mr. Speaker, this week the House will be voting for the 
37th time to repeal the Affordable Care Act.
  This vote comes at a time when we are facing serious and pressing 
challenges, one of the most important of which is the operations of the 
sequester. That is 37 votes to repeal the Affordable Care Act.
  Let us set aside for a moment the important issue of how health 
reform is working and making quality care accessible and affordable for 
more Americans. I'll be speaking more about that from this floor in 
coming days, as I know some of my colleagues will.
  What I find--and I believe most Americans find--incomprehensible is 
how this House could waste its time on such a blatantly partisan vote 
when the effects of sequestration are having a growing negative effect 
on our economy and on the lives of so many American families. That 
ought to be our focus this week and every week until we find a 
solution, Mr. Speaker.
  Speaker Boehner has said that this 37th repeal vote is justified 
because freshman Members have not had an opportunity to vote on that 
issue. If that is his view, then, by the same reasoning, he should 
allow a vote on a balanced alternative to the sequester. Freshmen have 
not had a chance to cast their votes on whether to replace the entire 
sequester with a big and balanced solution to deficits.
  If the House proceeds with a vote on repealing the Affordable Care 
Act on the grounds that Members deserve an opportunity to be on the 
record on such an important issue, surely, Mr. Speaker, we also ought 
to have a vote on replacing the sequester, which we know is having 
adverse effects on our economy and on our national security.
  American families and businesses are facing greater and greater 
uncertainty as the result of the sequester and the unwillingness on the 
part of Congress to take a meaningful, bipartisan action to stop it. 
With this uncertainty, businesses have slowed hiring and in some cases 
have even begun to lay off workers.
  This indiscriminate and irrational nature of the sequestration means 
that it's ill effects will be felt across our economy and society 
without regard to our priorities. It also means that none of us, not 
one of us in this Chamber, is immune in our own districts where 
constituents will see a reduction in services and dislocation.
  Because of the sequester, we are at risk of 70,000 young people 
kicked off Head Start; 10,000 teacher jobs at risk for title I cuts; 4 
million fewer Meals on Wheels for seniors; 600,000 women, infants, and 
children dropped off the rolls; emergency unemployment insurance cut by 
11 percent for 2 million out-of-work Americans; 2,100 fewer food-safety 
inspections. That's a drop of 18 percent to make sure that our food is 
safe. And one-third of combat air units are grounded.
  The responsible path forward is for Democrats and Republicans to work 
together on a big and balanced approach to deficits that restores 
certainty to our businesses and families.
  Four times Mr. Van Hollen, the ranking member of the Budget 
Committee, has offered an amendment to the sequester, which would get 
to the same deficit reduction, but in a way that was prioritizing those 
things that are important in our country and eliminating those that are 
not, and raising some additional revenues, as well.
  Not only has that not been considered, but the Republicans have 
refused to allow that amendment on the floor. Yet we have the 37th time 
to repeal the health care bill, which is already benefiting millions of 
Americans. It's not a responsible use of congressional time.
  I urge the Speaker and the Republican leader to cancel this repeal 
vote and get back to business by allowing us to consider a balanced 
alternative to the sequester this week.
  I also urge them to bring to the floor a motion to go to conference 
on the budget. My Republican friends pleaded for the Senate to pass a 
budget. The Senate passed a budget; we passed a budget. Regular order 
is going to conference where we could, in fact, come to an agreement on 
a big and balanced deal to replace this negatively impacting sequester.
  There is nothing on the schedule to do that, either to repeal the 
sequester

[[Page H2608]]

and change it or to go to conference, but a 37th vote that will go 
nowhere. And everybody who knows that to be the case is on the floor 
this week. How sad.

                          ____________________