[Congressional Record Volume 159, Number 67 (Tuesday, May 14, 2013)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3423-S3424]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                    WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT

  Ms. KLOBUCHAR. I come to the floor today to speak on the importance 
of passing the Water Resources Development Act or, as we know it around 
Washington, the WRDA bill.
  In my State they know it as a bill that is good for our harbors, 
rivers, and the flood protection we need in the Fargo-Moorhead area or, 
as I like to call it in Minnesota, the Moorhead-Fargo area.
  The bill advances a critical front to protect the Red River of the 
north to Moorhead, MN, and Fargo, ND. I visited this region twice over 
the last year, and I have been back literally every year I have been in 
the Senate because of flood threats--these years more than ever.
  This is literally an every-year occurrence now to the point where 
people have major sandbag operations filled with volunteers, seniors, 
and people from the prisons. Everyone is working together, but there 
must be a better way to do this. Just because we do it so well in North 
Dakota and Minnesota and have such an incredible spirit of voluntarism 
doesn't mean there is going to be one year where the flood is too great 
or that we should continue on this path when, in fact, we have the 
opportunity to have long-term flood protection.
  The river has been above major flood stage 6 out of the last 8 years. 
In 2009, the year of the record flood, the river rose to more than 40 
feet.
  I will remind the Presiding Officer of the Grand Forks flood and what 
happened there. It was literally just about an hour away from Fargo. So 
we were that close to that happening in Fargo and Moorhead.
  In Minnesota and North Dakota, the Red River doesn't divide us, it 
unites us. It is in that spirit of solidarity that we drive our efforts 
to help the Red River Basin. This year we were fortunate that the 
flooding was not nearly as severe as it had been projected. A week 
before the crest went down, it was projected to be the second biggest 
flood in history with the late snow.
  In 2009 and 2010 homes and farms with ring dikes around them looked 
like small islands floating in the floodwaters. If anyone thinks this 
lasts for a day or week, it literally lasts for months. Entire towns 
create ring dikes, and they can only get out of them with boats. That 
is what is happening near the Canadian border in Minnesota and North 
Dakota. The town of Georgetown, MN, is threatened every time the Red 
River rises and the Buffalo River overflows.
  The volunteer who was working at the emergency center--I went up to 
him and said: It is so nice that you are making lunches for people. He 
said he lost his entire home.
  I said: And you are here?
  He said: Yes, this is the only thing I could think of to do to help 
other people who had the same bad experience as me. That is the spirit 
of voluntarism in our States.
  I think we can do better. The annual threat of flooding in the Fargo-
Moorhead area underscores the need for permanent flood protection. We 
know about the devastating impact of floods. The flood diversion 
project, which is authorized in the WRDA bill, is critical to safety 
and economic development.
  I have enjoyed working with Congressman Peterson on flood diversion 
efforts, including retention, which he cares a lot about, and we did 
get some funding for that. I was able to get funding in the farm bill 
today to help with that. I have also worked with Senator Hoeven, 
Senator Heitkamp, and Senator Franken on this long-term project to have 
actual permanent solutions to our flooding project in Fargo and 
Moorhead.
  We have a problem, and the WRDA bill is the beginning of a solution. 
Also included in this bill is a Roseau River project, which is at a 
critical point. The WRDA bill helps address flood protection for 
Roseau, MN. Roseau has recovered from a flood in 2002 that caused 
widespread damage, but the area needs flood protection to reduce the 
flood stages in the city. The next phase of the plan will include a 
diversion channel, a restriction structure, and two storage areas 
designed to remove the city from the regular 100-year regulatory 
floodplain and reduce future flood damages by nearly 86 percent.
  The WRDA bill also advances our Nation's water infrastructure, which 
is something the Presiding Officer knows a little bit about in 
Massachusetts. It is clear that our 21st-century economy demands 21st-
century infrastructure, and we cannot afford to sit back any longer and 
allow it to crumble. No place knows this better than Minnesota.
  I lived six blocks from that 35W bridge, which is an eight-lane 
highway. One day, in the middle of a summer day, the bridge fell down 
in the middle of the Mississippi River. As I said that day, a bridge 
just shouldn't fall down in the middle of America, but it did.
  We are seeing the same crumbling infrastructure and problems with 
many of our ports across the country. Failure to take action will have 
consequences no one likes. According to the American Society of Civil 
Engineers, inefficiencies in infrastructure are estimated to drive up 
the cost of doing business by an estimated $430 billion, and that is 
just in this decade.
  The civil engineers' 2013 report card gives our Nation's 
infrastructure an overall D-plus grade. As someone who has taught 
students before, I think the Presiding Officer knows that is not a good 
grade. Our inland waterways infrastructure, which includes our locks 
and dams on the Mississippi River, gets a D-minus, and our ports 
received a C grade. We cannot be satisfied with those grades.
  When people hear ``ports'' they think of places such as 
Massachusetts, South Carolina, Florida, and California. But, in fact, 
the Great Lakes--including Lake Superior, which we are so proud of in 
Minnesota--have very significant ports.
  In fact, when I first came to the Senate, I was assigned to the 
Commerce Committee and somehow found myself on the oceans subcommittee. 
I remember sitting at my first meeting thinking: What am I doing here? 
I am on the oceans subcommittee. I wrote a note to the Senator from New 
Jersey, Frank Lautenberg, that said: I am the only Senator on the 
subcommittee who doesn't have an ocean. I kept the note he wrote back 
to me. The note said: It is easy, next year just come back and ask for 
one.

  Well, in fact, I found out since then that the oceans subcommittee 
included the Great Lakes so it gave me a platform to advocate for our 
Great Lakes. The Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund, which is so important 
to our ocean-bordering States, also includes the Great Lakes. The 
Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund collects $700 million each year more than 
it spends on dredging. In other words, it collects $700 million more 
each year than it spends on dredging and maintenance.
  Meanwhile, our ports and navigation channels wait for basic 
maintenance. We need to correct this disparity and ensure the funds are 
spent to address the needs of the shippers and ensure that the Great 
Lakes system does not fall into further disrepair.
  I was just up at the Port of Duluth-Superior to highlight the need 
for dredging and maintenance on the Great Lakes. The Port of Duluth-
Superior is ranked among the top 20 ports in the U.S. by cargo tonnage. 
It sees 40 million short tons of cargo and nearly 1,000 vessel visits 
every year. I think people would be surprised by that since Minnesota 
has lakes. In fact, we have 1 of the top 20 ports in the country.
  We have 11,500 jobs that are dependent on cargo shipments in and out 
of the port. The port is critical to the economy of northeastern 
Minnesota where my dad was born and my grandpa worked as an iron ore 
miner. Guess what. That is how they got the iron ore out of Minnesota 
and out to the world.
  It is critical that high-use ports like Duluth and Two Harbors get 
dredged so they can support the ships. It is vital

[[Page S3424]]

that their trading partners throughout the Great Lakes system receive 
maintenance as well. Both Duluth and Two Harbors, MN, ports are 
considered deep-water ports, so they come into a classification which 
has tended to get the funding, but, in fact, the entire Great Lakes 
navigation system is in trouble.
  The backlog of sediment due to insufficient dredging is more than 18 
million cubic yards and estimated at $200 million. When ships on the 
Great Lakes have to ``light load''--having to reduce the amount of 
cargo they carry because channels are not deep enough--our economy 
suffers.
  At first some people might think: What does light loading mean? At 
the end of 2012, the light loading to navigate the Soo Locks on the St. 
Mary's River between Lake Superior and Lake Huron meant 10,000 tons of 
cargo could not be transported on the final voyage. Think of it. These 
are American goods that our workers produced, and we want them to make 
more of it. Yet we literally cannot put them on the ships because we 
have not maintained our ports the way we are supposed to.
  The ships that are coming in cannot take the goods. They have to wait 
until the winter is done. That is what happened this year and has been 
happening many years.
  We are an export economy. America's way forward is to make goods 
again, invent, and export to the world. Well, that is not going to 
happen if we cannot get our goods to market. That is why I have been 
working so closely with Senators from across the Great Lakes to address 
this backlog. We have been able to make some progress.
  I cosponsored an amendment with Senator Levin to direct the Secretary 
of the Army Corps to manage the Great Lakes navigation system as an 
interconnected system. This would ensure that maintenance and dredging 
is done throughout the system. There is much more to do. I will 
continue to work with Senator Levin, Senator Stabenow, and other Great 
Lakes Senators on this bill.
  The WRDA bill will go a long way toward increasing the efficiency of 
the shipping across the Great Lakes system, thereby strengthening the 
economic standing of our agriculture, mining, manufacturing, and other 
industries.
  The bill also makes critical reforms to our Nation's rivers and 
waterways. The inland waterway system in this country spans 38 States 
and handles approximately one-half of the inland waterway freight. 
Farmers and businesses in my State transport soybeans, corn, and other 
commodities from Minnesota to other terminals in the South. From there, 
ships are loaded and the commodities are eventually delivered to 
trading partners.
  Again, if we want to produce and export to the world, we have to have 
the transportation system that supports it. With many maintenance and 
construction projects years overdue, the inland waterways are in dire 
need of major rehabilitation. The Inland Waterways Trust Fund, which 
funds these projects, is in steady decline. If we don't make the Inland 
Waterways Trust Fund sustainable, the industries that are so heavily 
dependent on the inland waterways will suffer, and this means jobs 
suffer.
  I cosponsored the RIVER Act with Senator Casey and Senator Landrieu 
to help move forward major construction projects on the inland waterway 
system. That bill is also supported by Senator Lamar Alexander. It is a 
bipartisan bill, and it includes much needed rehabilitation of the 
locks and dams along the Mississippi River.
  This bill includes a number of reforms to the project management 
process that will ensure that waterway projects are completed on time 
and minimize cost overruns.
  I also, by the way, support the amendment to increase the inland 
waterways user fee. I am a cosponsor of that amendment. Let me 
emphasize that the users who pay this fee have asked for it. We have a 
situation where the industries are willing to pay more so we can 
improve the locks and dams so they can get their goods to market. That 
is what is going on here. They understand we are having budget issues, 
and they are willing to pay a higher fee to pay for the changes.
  Industry partners from farmers to shippers to companies, such as 
cargo companies in my State, strongly support this user fee 
increase. The increase was, in fact, their idea. They realized that the 
government wasn't going to fund these and that they were having trouble 
doing business, and they have agreed to pay for this increased fee. To 
me, it is the perennial no-brainer that we get this done. They know 
this modest change would go a long way to making our Nation's rivers 
and waterways viable for years to come.

  While the fee increase will not advance, sadly, in the WRDA bill 
because it is considered a tax provision, it sends an important message 
that industry and shippers are at the table and volunteering more to 
help build the infrastructure our economic future requires. We plan on 
advancing this part of the river act in another bill--in tax reform or 
standing on its own--because we think it is so important to be able to 
fund these improvements to the locks.
  Finally, in Minnesota, the fishing and boating industries contribute 
around $4 billion to our State's economy each year. Sometimes I like to 
tease people and ask them how much money do they think we spend on 
worms in Minnesota every year. Well, it is literally tens of millions 
of dollars. People come to our State and buy worms and bait and other 
forms of fishing tackle because of their importance to our economy. In 
fact, for last weekend's Minnesota fishing opener, sadly, cold and ice 
covered many lakes, but people were still out there looking for that 
empty hole where there wasn't ice so they could put their line into the 
water.
  In Minnesota, we also know how important it is to address invasive 
species problems, especially when they threaten our lakes and rivers. 
In our State the problem of Asian carp is literally swimming and 
jumping into our lives. Anyone who hasn't seen the YouTube video should 
look at it. You can see Asian carp literally jumping out of the water 
and hitting fishermen in the head. We are very concerned because we 
have seen problems with them downriver in southern Minnesota. They are 
coming our way, and we do not want them to ruin our way of life in 
Minnesota, nor do we want them to hurt our jobs and our $4 billion 
fishing and gaming industry.
  I believe we need an ``all-of-the-above'' solution to this challenge 
that includes research, carp barriers, as well as authority to close 
the Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock. I am very glad the provision was 
included to allow for greater coordination between Federal agencies 
when it comes to Asian carp, and this also includes rivers and not just 
the Great Lakes.
  So we are continuing to work on this bill when it comes to Asian carp 
and other invasive species, but I think there are some other good 
provisions in this bill as well.
  I wish to commend Senators Boxer and Vitter for their great work to 
put together this bipartisan legislation. I support its passage, from 
fighting to protect towns from flooding to critical waterway 
infrastructure. This legislation is vital to our economy, to our 
environment, to our cities, and to our towns. I am excited to be a part 
of it. I hope my colleagues support it and we can get this done.
  Thank you, Madam President. I yield the floor.

                          ____________________