[Congressional Record Volume 159, Number 52 (Wednesday, April 17, 2013)]
[House]
[Pages H2070-H2071]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
PATH TO STATEHOOD
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
Puerto Rico (Mr. Pierluisi) for 5 minutes.
Mr. PIERLUISI. Mr. Speaker, in November 2012, Puerto Rico held a
referendum on its political status. The results demonstrated that a
clear majority of the U.S. citizens of Puerto Rico want to end the
island's current territory status, that a supermajority prefers
statehood among the possible alternatives, and that--for the first time
in history--more voters favor statehood than the current status.
As I have remarked before, not a single one of my stateside
colleagues in Congress would accept territory status for their own
constituents. So they must recognize and respect that the American
citizens of Puerto Rico no longer accept it either. I also trust that
my colleagues who represent States will credit my constituents for
aspiring to have the same rights and responsibilities as their
constituents.
Last week, the President took an important step. As part of the
proposed budget the administration submitted to Congress, the Justice
Department is seeking $2.5 million to conduct the first Federally
sponsored vote on Puerto Rico's political status in the 115 years that
the territory has been under the U.S. flag. The funding would be
granted to Puerto Rico's Elections Commission to conduct objective
voter education and a vote on ``options that would resolve Puerto
Rico's future political status.''
Key congressional leaders in the House and the Senate, Republican and
Democrat alike, have already issued statements of support for the
President's action, calling it an appropriate response to the local
referendum.
Mr. Speaker, my constituents may not have a vote in the government
that makes their national laws, but they do have a voice--and they made
that voice heard loud and clear in November. A budget reflects one's
priorities and values. I support the President's budget because it
shows respect for the democratically expressed aspirations of the U.S.
citizens who reside in Puerto Rico. And it demonstrates a clear desire
to
[[Page H2071]]
move forward on this complex but critical issue.
As the budget request states, the Federally sponsored vote is to be
among options that would resolve Puerto Rico's political status. The
only way to resolve the island's status is through statehood or
national sovereignty. Puerto Rico cannot resolve its status by
maintaining the same undemocratic status that my people have endured
since 1898 and that they soundly rejected in November. The current
status is the root cause of Puerto Rico's political, economic, and
social problems, so it cannot also be the solution to those problems.
In addition, the budget language clearly states that the Department
of Justice shall not provide funding until it certifies that the ballot
and voter education materials are consistent with the Constitution,
basic laws, and policies of the United States. The purpose of this
language is to ensure that the ballot does not include impossible
status proposals that have been repeatedly declared unworkable as a
matter of both law and policy by the Federal Government. I am pleased
that the administration understands that true self-determination is a
choice among options that can be implemented, not an exercise in
wishful thinking.
The President's request represents one path forward, but it is
important to underscore that it is not the only path forward. In the
coming weeks, I will introduce stand-alone legislation on the status
issue that will both complement President Obama's request and reflect
the undisputable fact that statehood won the November referendum.
Puerto Rico stands in a far different place today than it did six
months ago. A historic referendum was held, the President responded to
the results, and Congress now has a responsibility to act. Those who
seek democracy, equality, and progress for Puerto Rico are on the
forward march, while those who support the failed status quo are in
retreat. We drive the debate, while they merely react to the debate.
And, in the end, mindful that the arc of history is long but that it
bends towards justice, I am confident we will prevail.
____________________