[Congressional Record Volume 159, Number 51 (Tuesday, April 16, 2013)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2660-S2663]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
COMMEMORATING VIRGINIA TECH SHOOTING
Mr. KAINE. Mr. President, I rise to perform a solemn duty today,
which is to commemorate the shooting at Virginia Tech of 32 students
and faculty members who were killed 6 years ago today and many others
who were injured:
Ross Alameddine, Jamie Bishop, Brian Bluhm, Ryan Clark, Austin
Michelle Cloyd, Jocelyne Couture-Nowak, Daniel Alejandro Perez Cueva,
Kevin Granata, Matthew Gwaltney, Caitlin Hammaren, Jeremy Herbstritt,
Rachael Elizabeth Hill, Emily Hilscher, Jarrett Lane, Matthew La Porte,
Henry Lee, Liviu Librescu, G.V. Loganathan, Partahi Mamora Halomoan
Lumbantoruan, Lauren McCain, Daniel O'Neil, Juan Ramon Ortiz-Ortiz,
Minal Panchal, Erin Peterson, Michael Pohle, Julia Pryde, Mary Karen
Read, Reema Samaha, Waleed Mohammed Shaalan, Leslie Sherman, Maxine
Turner, and Nichole White.
I read those names to honor those who were killed and had their lives
snuffed out on April 16, 2007. I acknowledge also that many students
and faculty members were injured. We have with us today both family
members of those who are deceased and even some students who were
injured. I also honor all in the Hokie, the Virginia Tech community
that is very close, that still suffers the wounds from this horrible
shooting.
In the aftermath of the shooting at Virginia Tech 6 years ago today,
we learned a lot. We learned that we have
[[Page S2661]]
to make fixes to the mental health system: that school security and
safety is incredibly important, that alert systems that can notify
people when bad things happen are incredibly important. We also learned
a tragic but important lesson; that is, background record checks make
us safer. The young, troubled individual with no criminal record who
committed those horrible crimes had a long history of mental illness.
He had been adjudicated mentally ill and dangerous. Because of that
adjudication, he was not supposed to be able to own or purchase
weapons, but a flaw in the background record check system kept that
record from being entered into the national database. So when he
decided and went to purchase the weapons he used in committing this
horrible homicide, he was allowed to purchase them.
In the immediate aftermath of the shooting, with the strong support
of the Virginia Tech families, we fixed that problem in the background
record check. As Governor, I worked with my Republican attorney
general, the current Governor of Virginia, Bob McDonnell. We fixed the
background record check system that facilitated this gruesome crime.
Background records checks make us safer. The better the system, the
safer we are.
I later went to my legislature and tried to get them to fix the
background record check in another way--by closing the gun show
loophole, to require records checks at gun shows. I failed in that
task. I not only could not convince my legislature to do it, I could
not even convince a single committee to report a bill out to the floor.
That is why I am so glad we are debating on the floor meaningful
fixes to gun violence, including a fix to our background record check
system when it comes to gun shows or online purchases. I look forward
to the debate, and I look forward to supporting the proposals that have
been advanced by Senators Manchin and Toomey.
I read the names, the 32 names of those who were killed. As I
conclude, I wish to take a couple of minutes to tell the story of one
of the individuals.
I read the name of Liviu Librescu, who was a professor at Virginia
Tech, a professor of engineering. He was teaching a course in Norris
Hall on the day of this horrible tragedy, and as shots rang out, he
heard the shots. He went to the door, and he barricaded the door with
his own body, and on the second floor of Norris Hall, he told his
students to get out of the window and get to the ground and get to
safety. He stood there against the door as Seung-Hui Cho, the shooter,
fired repeated rounds through the door, striking his body many times
and eventually killing him. But not until the last shot when he was
killed did he stop saying to the students: Hurry. You have time. You
can get out of the window. And all but one of Liviu Librescu's students
were able to get out of the window. One student, Minal Panchal, ended
up being killed because he bravely waited for the other students to go
out the window first.
What heroism and bravery. Yet the Liviu Librescu story is even more
powerful than that because Liviu Librescu, the professor, was 76 years
old--long past retirement age. He had continued to teach because he
loved teaching.
He was born in 1930 in Romania. When the Romanian Government became
allied with Nazi Germany in 1940, because he was Jewish and his family
was Jewish, he was subjected to the persecution Jews in Romania were
subjected to, his family was sent into forced labor camps, and Liviu
Librescu lived in a crowded ghetto in a Romanian city, being
persecuted, but he came through the Holocaust as a survivor. Many Jews,
after the war, left Romania because of the persecution of Jews, but it
was Liviu Librescu's home, and he stayed. He went to a university, and
he became a world-renowned aerospace engineer, and he continued to
teach.
But now Romania fell under the influence, as a puppet state, of the
Soviet Union. He would not pledge allegiance to the Communist Party. He
would not relinquish his tie to his Judaic faith. Because of that, he
began to be subjected to persecution for a second time, to be
persecuted because of his religion, to be denied the ability to publish
articles or travel to academic conferences. Eventually, he lost his job
at the university because of his Judaism and because he was unwilling
to take the oath of allegiance to the Communist Party.
He was persona non grata in his home country of Romania. However,
people in the outside world who knew of his scholarship never let go,
and they continued to speak on Liviu Librescu's behalf. He was
eventually allowed, in 1977, to emigrate to Israel.
He lived in Israel for 8 years and received a 1-year teaching
fellowship at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, VA. He came for 1 year and
never left. He taught as a popular teacher and researcher in
Blacksburg, VA, from 1985 until the day he was killed in 2007.
This horrible day, April 16, 2007, started as a normal Monday for
virtually everyone who ended up sharing the tragic fate. It was not a
normal day. It did not start as a normal day for Liviu Librescu. Liviu
Librescu, as a proud Jew, observed that day, from sundown on the 15th
of April, the evening before, until sundown on the 16th of April, as
Yom HaShoah, Holocaust and Heroism Memorial Day.
Yom HaShoah, in the Jewish religion since 1953, has been a day
worldwide where Jews and their allies remember the Holocaust,
perpetrators, victims, and the bystanders--the bystanders who wouldn't
do anything to stop the atrocity.
They also remember the heroism of those who fought against the
Holocaust.
As Professor Librescu went to his class on this day, while it was a
normal Monday for most, I know he walked into his class thinking about
Yom HaShoah, perpetrators, victims, bystanders, and heroes. He made a
decision, in the split second he heard shots being fired, to be a hero
and to save others' lives.
He survived the Holocaust, perpetrated by Nazi Germany, and anti-
Semitism in Romania. He survived the persecution perpetrated in his
country by the Soviet Union. However, Liviu Librescu could not survive
the epidemic of gun violence in this country, the country which he
adopted and loved.
In conclusion, I would encourage all of us to take a minute,
Senators, staff, pages, people in the gallery, members of the press,
take a moment and ask yourselves would you do what Liviu Librescu did.
Would you put your body against a door, allow yourself to be shot, and
encourage others to be safe? Would you do that? Would we do this?
As I thought about this question, being honest, I would say I hope I
would do that. I pray if it comes to that I would act to protect others
ahead of myself.
If I am honest with myself, what I have to say is I don't know
whether I would do that. I don't know whether I would be a hero like
Liviu Librescu. I don't know if I would have the courage to do what
Liviu Librescu did.
The good news for those of us who have the honor and blessing to
serve in this Chamber is we do not need to put our body in front of
bullets to keep people safe. We do not need to put our bodies in front
of bullets to protect kids and protect students. All we need to do is
have an infinitesimal portion of the courage Liviu Librescu had and
cast votes. We need to cast votes on the floor of this body to keep our
community safer and to keep our children safer.
I have heard it said this will be a hard vote. For 20 years there has
not been a meaningful discussion of these issues on the floor of the
Senate because interests are too powerful, the NRA is too powerful. It
will be a vote which will be scored, and we need to worry about it. It
will take courage. It does not take courage, to any degree, when we
think about Liviu Librescu, who saved his students.
Last week I met the daughter of Mary Sherlach, who was the guidance
counselor in Sandy Hook who ran to save her students and was killed.
When we think about the courage and heroism shown by these individuals,
what we are being asked to do on the floor of this body is the least we
can do.
It is about heroism. We honor heroes such as Liviu Librescu. The
people who put us in office expect us to have at least a small measure
of courage, a small measure of heroism. We owe it to those students and
others who were shot, killed, and wounded at Virginia Tech. We owe it
to the people who were killed or wounded in Newtown. I would ask all my
colleagues to reflect upon
[[Page S2662]]
the example of Professor Librescu and the heroism he showed as we
debate what might be a controversial proposal this week.
Again, the blessing we have as Senators is that we do not have to
interpose our bodies in the way of violence to make a difference and
make people safer. It is my wish we do that as we debate and vote in
the coming days.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Virginia.
Mr. WARNER. Mr. President, let me first say I also am on the floor
because today is April 16, the sixth anniversary of the horrible
shootings at the campus of Virginia Tech. I think every Virginian and
every American--I can say Virginians at least--remember when we first
received those news reports of the violence perpetrated by Seung-Hui
Cho.
I say to my colleague and friend, the Senator from Virginia, in the
33 years we have known each other I have valued his friendship and
appreciate his intellect, grace, and knowledge. There was never a
moment I was prouder of then-Governor Tim Kaine than those moments
after the tragedy.
I don't know if in his comments he noted he had been on a trade
mission in Asia when these incidents happened. He barely had landed
when he turned around--he and his wife Anne--boarded a plane and came
back with virtually no rest. As a Governor you bear these
responsibilities in remarkable ways when Virginians are hurt, and in
those days he spoke for all of us.
The words he said at the Virginia Tech campus in the ceremony
afterward brought together the community and brought together our
Commonwealth. In many ways he spoke for our whole Nation, as he has so
eloquently spoken this morning. I thank him for what he did as a
Virginian in those days afterward and thank him for the eloquent
comments he made this morning.
In the aftermath of the tragedy at Virginia Tech, under the
leadership of Governor Kaine, Virginia acted. We were within the
legislature able to close the legal loophole which allowed Cho, who had
been adjudicated mentally unsound, we closed the loophole so he could
no longer--or someone who had been adjudicated in such a way--be able
to purchase firearms. In the aftermath of the tragedy, then-Governor
Kaine appointed a nationally respected commission of experts to
recognize what happened and recognize ways we might make all our
colleges and universities safer.
This leads me to some of my comments this morning. We are about to
take on a debate around how we keep America and Americans safer in a
way that also respects our constitutional amendment of the right to
keep and bear arms.
An underlying amendment of the bill we are about to debate has at
least one part of the legislation which is relatively noncontroversial,
a piece of legislation I have been working on for some time. I know
Senator Kaine has supported this as well. The issue is to look at
campus safety. It has been one of the top priorities of those victims
of the Virginia Tech massacre.
Those families who have spoken with me repeatedly, and with Senator
Kaine as well, said let's at least make sure, if a tragic event takes
place on a college campus somewhere in America, there are ways we can
learn from these tragedies.
So the CAMPUS Safety Act, which is embedded in this legislation, will
bring together research and resources on campus safety to strengthen
training and improve collaboration. Today, campus public safety
officers are the only first responders who don't have access to Federal
support to assist in sharing the best practices, relevant research, and
training opportunities.
The CAMPUS Safety Act, which received bipartisan support in the
committee markup, seeks to address this by consolidating scattered
Federal efforts into a national center for campus public safety housed
within the Department of Justice. This Center would not only provide a
one-stop repository of relevant research but also examples of best
practices. It would have an ability to issue grants to colleges,
universities, and nonprofit organizations to strengthen efforts to help
make our campus community safer.
This kind of planning and training will help prevent future violence
on our campuses and will help improve responses in the event of another
horrific outbreak of violence on our campus or other university. I am
pleased our bipartisan CAMPUS Safety Act is included in the discussions
we are having in this body in the coming days and weeks.
I wish to take a moment to speak about a specific aspect of this
debate which will, I imagine, be coming up for a vote in the next few
days. I stand before my colleagues to say a few words in support of the
Manchin-Toomey amendment we will most likely vote on this week. Both
Senators Manchin and Toomey have shown courage in working together on
what Senator Kaine said is a difficult issue. I support the bipartisan
compromise on background checks they proposed.
Their amendment will strengthen our background check system, close
the gun show loophole, and prohibit the commercial sale of guns to
those who are seriously mentally ill or have a criminal record. Let me
also say their amendment also contains appropriate exemptions so
responsible gun owners will still be allowed to make direct
transactions between family and friends to ensure a father or
grandfather could pass that shotgun along to their son or daughter.
Our shared goal is to ensure we keep guns out of the hands of the
wrong people while respecting the basic constitutional right to bear
arms. I have been disappointed by some who said somehow this amendment
will infringe upon this right. I couldn't disagree more. This has been
a common refrain on both sides of the aisle since we started this
conversation in December after the tragic events in Newtown.
If we are serious about achieving this goal, the Manchin-Toomey
amendment achieves a thoughtful, effective, and balanced approach to
achieving our background check system. It strengthens the instant check
system of all States to put their information into the NICS, the
National Instant Background Check System. One of the outgrowths we saw
after the horrible tragedy at Virginia Tech was so many States, while
they may have collected this information, didn't even put it into the
national database.
One other amendment Senator Toomey put forward would establish a
national commission on mass violence to study all the causes of mass
violence in our country, including school safety, mental health, issues
about firearms, and also issues around some of the images all of us and
our children are exposed to in television and film.
This amendment, combined with provisions to prevent gun trafficking
and our proposal to improve campus safety, represents a reasonable path
forward. In our efforts to reduce violence--as Senator Kaine has so
eloquently stated--we are trying to ensure we don't have to create the
kinds of heroes which took place 6 years ago on the campus of Virginia
Tech.
Let me also add, as I am sure all my colleagues will express, our
hearts go out to the families of the victims of the most recent tragedy
which took place in Boston. I think I can relate, as a former resident
of Boston--and I know Senator Kaine, former Governor Kaine, then-law
student Tim Kaine--he and I first met at a law school in Boston--
remembering Patriots' Day in Boston, when even if you were not going to
run in the marathon, the kind of joy that swept through Boston on
Patriots' Day. We all know Boston will be back. We all saw those images
yesterday of the horrific tragedy.
I talked to a friend whose wife had literally finished the race 4
minutes before the bombing took place. If she had finished 4 minutes
later, he or his daughter or his wife might have been one of the
victims of that tragedy. I know, as a father, I called my daughters
last night to try to enforce how much I love them, how valuable life
is, and how at any moment, whether in a classroom in Virginia Tech or
running the Boston Marathon, life can be snuffed out.
I agree with Senator Kaine that in the coming days and weeks, as we
have this debate, we are not going to be asked to make acts of courage;
we are simply going to be asked to do our job. I believe the Manchin-
Toomey amendment and the CAMPUS Safety Act are part of our role and
responsibility in doing our job, and I hope we will be able to act on
that matter.
[[Page S2663]]
With that, I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Ms. Hirono). The Senator from Texas.
____________________