[Congressional Record Volume 159, Number 35 (Tuesday, March 12, 2013)]
[Senate]
[Pages S1704-S1705]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                       CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS

  Mr. COBURN. Madam President, I was sitting in my office listening to 
Senator Reid, meeting with my staff on the bill we have on the floor, 
and I wanted to explain to the American people what this bill is.
  This bill was published last night at 9:00. We got it at about 9:45. 
It spends well over $1 trillion. And I agree with the majority leader, 
it is important that we pass this bill, but knowing what is in it 
before you can decide where you would like to try to amend it is asking 
something of Senators that they can't give.
  So I understand the majority leader's frustration, but I would also 
make a couple points.
  In this bill is $8 billion taken out of the victims' compensation 
fund. That is not tax money. That is money which criminals have paid 
into a fund to give restitution to children and women around this 
country for the harm that has occurred from the crime that has been 
committed upon them, and we are stealing $8 billion from that fund. In 
this bill, we are taking it away--not tax dollars but fines and 
penalties--and we are going to spend it somewhere else. You talk about 
being for women and children? This bill is exactly the opposite of 
that. Money that is due them we are not going to let them have. We are 
going to go spend it somewhere else.
  So knowing those things are in the bill is one of the reasons we 
ought to read the bill before we can know whether we are going to offer 
amendments on it.
  I would also make one final point. The vast majority of this bill 
passed the Appropriations Committee in the Senate last spring and early 
summer. There is not one of the things that are in this bill that the 
Appropriations Committee hadn't already done, and we had a deliberate 
choice to not put these bills on the floor last time. So if we are in a 
snit over the problems we are having, it is because the bills didn't 
come in regular order to the floor of the Senate so there could have 
been a conference.

[[Page S1705]]

  By the way, the House passed 12 of the 13. Our committees worked 12 
of the 13 out. So they came out in regular process. They were not 
allowed to come to the floor.
  We have just about finished studying the bill. We have no problems 
moving on the bill and giving consent to move on the bill once we have 
looked at the bill. But for the majority leader to say that Members of 
the Senate can't have amendments after having their staff work since 
9:45 last night to look at the bill and attempt to make amendments to 
the bill, that doesn't fit on a trillion-dollar bill. And when the 
American people find out what is in this bill that should not be in it, 
and the options that we can offer of what should be in it, I think they 
are going to agree that maybe we ought to make some changes.
  I understand the frustration of the majority leader, but I also 
understand our rights. This is not about filibustering anything. This 
is about being an informed Senator who knows what you are doing and 
knows how to make a decision about how to amend the bill. We can call 
it something other than that, but it is not. It is about doing our job. 
The fact is, we got this last night.
  What I would say to everybody who was fine with us going on it 
without having read it, I would say there is a problem with their 
position in the Senate in terms of their oath to do what they were sent 
here to do, which is to read what you are voting on, know what you are 
voting, and prepare amendments to what you are voting on.
  We have this outburst at 16 hours after we got an almost 600-page 
bill? That doesn't fit with any common sense. We have instructed our 
side we are willing to go ahead and allow this to move forward but in a 
process that recognizes that this bill is not perfect, just as both the 
chairman of the Appropriations Committee and the ranking member said. 
We do not have any problems with it moving forward. We do have problems 
spending money we don't have on things we don't need, and we ought to 
be able to offer amendments that would highlight that whether the body 
agrees with it or not--that would highlight it so the American people 
can see it. We may not be allowed, based on what the majority leader 
said, to offer any amendments. He is the majority leader. But if that 
is the case, we are probably going to be here all through the weekend 
because that is a right each Senator has and they ought to be able to 
offer them--especially on a $1 trillion appropriations bill.
  I hope Senator Reid has a good night's sleep. I will try to call him 
in the morning and work out an accommodation that will allow this bill 
to move so we do not have to be here on the weekend. I don't want to be 
here this weekend, but I will if it is the right thing to get the point 
out and let American people know.
  Right now we are having no tours of the White House. I can show you 
hundreds and hundreds of thousands of dollars that are under the 
control of the executive that they could save that are a whole lot less 
important than tours of the White House. The same goes for us in the 
operation of our House, in terms of the Senate and the House.
  I am sorry I irritated Senator Reid. I am sorry he is upset with me, 
but I am going to do my job. I have been here, I am in my ninth year, 
and I have always kept my obligation to the people of this country to 
make sure I am thinking about the long term, I am thinking about 
priority on how we spend money and the best way, the right way, and 
offering amendments, whether they pass or not, offering those ideas. 
That is because that is not only my privilege but it is my obligation.
  With that I yield the floor.

                          ____________________