[Congressional Record Volume 159, Number 28 (Wednesday, February 27, 2013)]
[Senate]
[Pages S926-S927]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
CLIMATE CHANGE
Mr. WHITEHOUSE. I am here, actually, Mr. President, to once again
urge Congress that we have to wake up to the growing threat of climate
change. The alarm bells are ringing. The signs are all around us. Yet
we continue to sleepwalk through history, ignoring the warnings from
the scientific community, from economists and business leaders--even
from our military--of long-term shifts in the climate of our planet.
Another alarm has now sounded--this time by the Government
Accountability Office, the taxpayers' watchdog. For the first time
ever, the threat to the Federal Government of climate change has been
included on the Government Accountability Office's High Risk List.
Every 2 years, at the start of a new Congress, GAO--the Government
Accountability Office--provides the House and Senate with a list of
program areas that are at high risk. GAO was the government's
nonpartisan auditor, and the High Risk List is its catalog of threats
to the integrity and performance of the Federal Government.
GAO says:
Solutions to high-risk problems offer the potential to save
billions of dollars, improve service to the public, and
strengthen the performance and accountability of the U.S.
government.
House Oversight Committee chairman, Darrell Issa, has called the High
Risk List ``the most important report published.'' As we face the
indiscriminate spending cuts of the multibillion-dollar sequester,
Chairman Issa pointed out that ``the list represents tremendous
opportunities to save those billions of dollars.'' It is enough,
actually, to prevent the sequester we are careening toward twice over.
Only 55 issues have been elevated to the High Risk List since it
first began in 1990. The current list comprises 30 big-ticket problems,
such as improving defense program management, protecting the Nation's
cyber infrastructure, and modernizing Federal health programs. When a
problem reaches GAO's High Risk List, it shouldn't matter if you are a
Democrat or a Republican. These issues must be among the top priorities
of Congress and of the Nation.
Add now to this list of serious national problems the destabilizing
fiscal risk posed by climate change.
The Federal Government and our military--and by definition, the
American taxpayer--own and operate hundreds of thousands of buildings
and extensive infrastructure in every State, including utilities, flood
control and navigation systems, powerplants, distribution networks, and
irrigation systems, not to mention the usual roads and bridges. The
Federal Government also manages about 650 million acres of land for
grazing, for timber, for conservation, and for recreation. That is
nearly 30 percent of the total area of the United States, and climate
change is affecting virtually all of it.
The overwhelming majority of climate scientists tell us that the air
and oceans are warming, that sea level is rising, and that we are
changing the very chemistry of our oceans. These changes--some of them
unprecedented in human history--increase the risk of extreme weather,
such as heat waves, floods, droughts, and storms. As GAO points out,
Federal assets in every corner of the country are at risk.
Storms crashing into the Southeast, wildfires burning throughout the
West, and floods inundating the Northeast are not just local problems.
Droughts are draining aquifers in the Midwest, warm temperatures are
melting permafrost in Alaska, and rising, warming, more acidic oceans
are eroding our national coast lines and threatening our lives and our
seas. These are not just local problems. Climate change is a high-risk
threat to our shared national well-being, our shared national wealth,
and our shared national heritage.
The GAO High Risk List sounds yet another alarm that we are fools to
ignore. For instance, GAO found that neither the National Flood
Insurance Program nor the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation is
prepared to deal with climate change.
Between 1980 and 2005, the Flood Insurance Program's exposure
quadrupled to nearly $1 trillion. The Crop Insurance Program increased
26-fold to $44 billion. Yet GAO reports that these programs have not
even developed the ``information needed to understand their long-term
exposure to climate change and not yet analyzed the potential impacts
of an increase in the frequency or severity of weather-related
events.''
Major private insurance companies such as Allianz, Swiss Re, Munich
Re, and Lloyd's of London have for years been developing strategies to
address climate change. Our Federal insurance programs don't even have
the basic information to address these risks.
Understanding and preparing for these risks is essential to protect
our communities from catastrophic loss. According to NOAA, the value of
flood insurance coverage in my home State of Rhode Island was $2.2
billion in 2011. The Ocean State has received $57 million in payouts
since 1978, some of which helped Rhode Islanders recover from our
record floods of 2010 brought on by extremely heavy rainfall. Folks who
have flood coverage through the National Flood Insurance Program should
know that heavy rainfall has increased in the Northeast by 74 percent
since the 1950s, and scientists predict that warmer air will continue
to increase the frequency of heavy rainfall and consequent flooding in
the Northeast.
Disaster aid is expensive. FEMA has obligated more than $80 billion
in Federal disaster aid between 2004 and 2011. Another $50.5 billion in
emergency aid was just approved for the northeastern communities
devastated by Hurricane Sandy. PSE&G, New Jersey's largest utility,
plans to spend over $4 billion over 10 years to make its electric and
gas systems more resilient to these severe storms. New Jersey's second
largest utility, JDP&L, announced that it intends to spend $200 million
to do the same. According to Jeanne Fox, who is a commissioner on the
New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, ``This is a cost of climate
change, pure and simple.''
It is really time for us to wake up. In the private sector, the
insurance and utility industries are facing the threat. Congress must
now act responsively.
House Oversight Committee ranking member Elijah Cummings asked GAO
Comptroller Gene Dodaro if it was ``GAO's opinion that regardless of
the outcome of global negotiations to reduce carbon emissions, the
United States Government should take immediate action to mitigate the
risk posed by the climate change.'' Comptroller General Dodaro
responded with a simple and unequivocal ``yes.''
In the High Risk List, GAO states that despite any possible future
reduction of emissions, ``greenhouse gases already in the atmosphere
will continue altering the climate system for many decades.'' That is
the way the laws of physics and chemistry work. Damage with lasting
consequences is already done.
Many effects of climate change can be mitigated, and it is the
responsibility of this Congress to help our Nation prepare and adapt.
Some Federal efforts are underway. In 2003 the U.S. Department of
Transportation initiated a study of climate risks to gulf coast
transportation. It is now cooperating in that study with the South
Alabama Regional Planning Commission. The Bureau of Land Management and
[[Page S927]]
the U.S. Forest Service are developing a drought vulnerability model, a
carbon storage map, and an alpine monitoring program to help land
managers in southwestern Colorado cope with the effects of a changing
climate. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have a Climate-
Ready States and Cities Initiative to help local health departments
prepare for changes in health risks driven by climate change. EPA
partnered with New York City's Department of Environmental Protection
to develop a software tool that helps drinking water and wastewater
utility operators understand how climate change poses risks to their
facilities.
Rhode Island, I am proud to say, is one of many States that have
formed a climate change commission. The commission is coordinating with
Federal officials to identify specific State and local challenges that
are presented by our changing climate. Twenty other States have similar
climate action plans developed or underway.
Despite the actions by States, the actions in the private sector, and
the warnings in the GAO High Risk List, special interest politics in
Congress prevent the Federal Government from using our resources
effectively and efficiently against this threat. The polluting special
interests have Washington gripped in a barricade of obstruction, and
the effect truly is disgraceful.
Consider, for example, NOAA's proposal to create a National Climate
Service, akin to its renowned National Weather Service. This was a no-
cost restructuring that would have centralized NOAA's work on
understanding the climate, including its observations of climate
change. The National Climate Service would have helped meet the growing
local demand for climate change science information. This proposal was
blocked by Republicans over in the House who simply don't want to hear
about climate change. That kind of thinking will not get climate change
off the High Risk List.
According to GAO, ``The Nation's vulnerability can be reduced by
limiting the magnitude of climate change through actions to limit
greenhouse gas emissions. . . . While implementing adaptive measures
may be costly, there is a growing recognition that the cost of inaction
could be greater and--given the government's precarious fiscal
position--increasingly difficult to manage given expected budget
pressures.''
Congress has been asleep long enough. We have a tradition in this
body of taking the accounting of GAO--our nonpartisan watchdog--
seriously and of taking GAO's High Risk List seriously. GAO now joins
our defense and intelligence communities, our scientific research
communities, our State and local governments, and major sectors of
private industry that have all elevated climate change from their to-do
list to their must-do list. It is time for Congress to wake up to its
duties and to get to work.
I yield the floor, and I note the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
The Republican leader is recognized.
____________________