[Congressional Record Volume 159, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 29, 2013)]
[Senate]
[Pages S347-S348]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Passing a Budget
Mr. CORNYN. Madam President, I rise to speak about taxes, debt, and
spending. It is time for President Obama to show real leadership on the
biggest threat America faces to our future prosperity. As my good
friend the Republican leader has said: If we don't get a handle on
spending and debt, not much else matters.
It has now been 1,371 days--almost 4 years--since Democrats, who
control the Senate, have brought a budget to the floor and had a vote
and passed the budget. Over that time, our national debt has grown by
more than $5.2 trillion. Our credit rating has been downgraded because
of fears we may not be able to pay back our debt when it is ultimately
due, and we have experienced the longest period of high unemployment
since the Great Depression.
Since the end of the official recession in 2009, Americans' median
household income has fallen by roughly $2,500, while the cost of
employer-provided family health insurance has increased by more than
$2,300--roughly a comparable amount. Not only has income fallen by
$2,500 but costs have gone up--thanks to ObamaCare--by $2,300 for the
average family.
Until recently, passing a budget was considered not optional. It was
considered a basic responsibility under the law. In fact, the Budget
Act requires that Congress pass a budget each year, but this law has
been defied for almost 4 years in the Senate.
I realize the Democratic leader--the majority leader--has said he did
not want to bring a budget to the floor because he did not want to put
his Members through a series of politically tough votes.
We cannot get to this problem by dealing with tax increases. This
seems to be the preferred method of dealing with our deficits and debt
by raising taxes, which, of course, happened as a result of the fiscal
cliff negotiations where taxes have gone up on Americans by roughly $60
billion a year, which will amount to almost $600 billion over the next
10 years. Nevertheless, the President's budgets continue to ask for
more revenue, but the message from this side of the aisle has been: The
President has gotten his pound of flesh on taxes. Now it is time to
deal with spending.
Unfortunately, we no longer have the luxury of delaying our toughest
fiscal decisions. Our gross national debt is now larger than our entire
economy, and we are now facing more than $100 trillion in unfunded
liabilities for things such as Medicare and Social Security. Those are
promises we will not be able to keep unless we act now to put them on a
fiscally sustainable path.
I am glad our House colleagues have passed the no budget, no pay
bill. I think most Americans appreciate the fact that if Congress
doesn't do its basic work such as passing a budget--something every
family and every small business in America has to do--then it should
not be paid.
That has already prompted Senate Democrats to say they are going to
take up a budget this year. Senator Murray, chairman of the Budget
Committee in the Senate, says she intends to mark up a budget. Senator
Reid and Senator Schumer have said they intend to see that a budget is
passed by the Chamber. But they have also said they are going to
attempt to extract more taxes from hard-working, middle-class taxpayers
in order to double down on Washington's spending binge.
Our biggest fiscal problem is excessive spending, not insufficient
taxation. We can't raise taxes high enough to close the trillion-
dollar-plus annual deficits or to make up this $16.5 trillion hole we
have dug. If we don't reduce spending and save Social Security and
Medicare, then we will eventually find ourselves in a debt crisis. When
that happens is when our creditors--the people who lend us money,
including the Chinese and other governments--demand more interest on
our loans and, eventually, interest rates go up to historic norms, the
debt spirals out of control, and we reach a crisis of monumental
proportions: It strangles the economy; it destroys jobs; it destroys
our standard of living.
Don't take my word for it. President Obama himself has acknowledged
that no amount of tax increases could sustain Medicare in its current
form. He has also said public officials who are concerned about
preserving government assistance for the elderly and the vulnerable
have an obligation--those are his words--have an obligation to reform
our entitlement programs and ensure their long-term viability. In other
words, the debt is not only the single greatest threat to our national
security, as former Chief of Staff Mike Mullen has said, it is also a
threat to our ability to provide a safety net to the most vulnerable in
our country.
I know Democrats and Republicans alike in this body understand the
problem. The President himself understands the problem. In December of
2010, his bipartisan fiscal commission known as Simpson-Bowles reported
the nature of the problem and a proposed beginning of a solution. Three
of the most conservative Republican Members of the Senate agreed with
that commission report. However, rather than embrace it, the President
walked away from it, and he has not come back to the table.
We also have another bipartisan commission headed by Alice Rivlin,
who was the Director of the Office of Management and Budget under Bill
Clinton, and Senator Pete Domenici, longtime chair of the Senate Budget
Committee--people who understand these matters better than just about
anybody. So there are solid, bipartisan proposals on the table. Yet
here we are, trillions of dollars later since the Obama administration
began, with no solution in sight.
The President had the American people with their back against the
wall with the expiring tax provisions on December 31 which led to the
so-called fiscal cliff. If we hadn't acted, taxes would have gone up
more than $3 trillion on all Americans. There would have been an
enormously negative impact on the economy and jobs. So we had to come
up with some sort of stopgap solution. But the President got his pound
of flesh. He got his revenue: $600 billion over 10 years.
Now is the time to return to what the President himself has called a
balanced approach to deficit reduction. Unfortunately, the President
has never even proposed a balanced approach, much less a balanced
budget. I can only hope that with his final election campaign behind
him and with the new term ahead of him, the President can begin to
grapple with and join us as we deal with our long-term fiscal
challenges.
I yield the floor and note the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. BLUMENTHAL. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. BLUMENTHAL. Mr. President, I am here to speak first and very
personally in support of the nomination of Senator Kerry to be our next
Secretary of State. There is a time when the man and the moment come
together in a profoundly historic way. Senator Kerry's nomination to be
Secretary of State of the United States at such a time when his
leadership can be pivotal in shaping America's role in the world, as a
leader for human rights, as well as the use of its extraordinary
strategic power for peace.
There is also a time when the woman and a moment come together and
that has been so for Hillary Clinton, who has done such extraordinary
work, incomparable in transforming America's role in world history. I
believe that just as she has met the challenges in guiding American
foreign policy and
[[Page S348]]
leading the dedicated men and women of our Foreign Service, so will
Senator Kerry rise to the difficult challenges ahead. Senator Kerry's
whole life has prepared him for this job, and I have every confidence
he will help keep America safe and secure and build our capacity and
alliances in pursuit of democracy and a more peaceful world.
Last week, I met with Senator Kerry to share my experiences from a
recent visit to the Middle East and Afghanistan and to urge him to
immediately take up the issue of the unfolding humanitarian catastrophe
occurring within Syria and across its borders in Turkey and Jordan. My
experiences came from a trip I took with Senator McCain and Senator
Whitehouse, and others of my colleagues who share my impression that
drastic and dramatic humanitarian aid must be provided for those
refugees.
I am pleased the President has announced an additional $155 million
for the Syrian people today. I believe we must also provide aid and
assistance to the Syrian Opposition Council. It matters as much how we
provide this aid as the total amount we provide. I am very encouraged
by Senator Kerry's listening and hearing us, and I look forward to
continuing our work with soon-to-be Secretary of State Kerry on this
issue and many other vital security concerns.