[Congressional Record Volume 159, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 22, 2013)]
[House]
[Pages H181-H182]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
THE FUTURE OF CLIMATE CHANGE
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
Oregon (Mr. Blumenauer) for 5 minutes.
Mr. BLUMENAUER. It was exciting to hear the President make climate
change a major focus of his inaugural address, and appropriately so.
Mr. Obama's first term provided stark evidence of the peril to the
planet: record-breaking heat waves, drought, hurricanes, forest fires,
disappearing polar ice, all in accord with a prediction of the climate
scientists, but the effects were happening faster and more severely
than predicted.
The good news is that you don't have to believe the climate
scientists to reduce carbon pollution and energy waste while
reasserting American global energy leadership. Even balancing the
budget could be made easier with this initiative.
Congress and the administration should begin serious conversation
about a broad-based carbon tax. This would give the right signals on
energy sources and use. It could raise money to reduce the deficit,
restore our badly damaged infrastructure, speed and finance
conservation while cushioning the impact on lower-income families and
small business.
There are a number of other commonsense steps that would make
progress on carbon pollution and energy conservation goals much more
significant. First, the EPA should stop dragging its feet, permitting
old, polluting, inefficient coal plants to continue to spew forth toxic
waste harming not just the environment but the health of our citizens.
It's past time that the Clean Air Act should be enforced. We should
make sure there are proper safeguards for the fracking technology for
gas and petroleum and making sure this vast reservoir of inexpensive
gas does not undercut the critical addition of renewables to our energy
portfolio: solar, wind, geothermal, perhaps even tidal energy.
We need global leadership on these technologies for a balanced energy
portfolio and, ultimately, to reduce our carbon footprint. At each
step, we should be looking to enhance energy conservation, because the
cheapest kilowatt hour is one that you don't have to generate and use.
We should have a 10-year glide path in our support of renewable
energy. The wind energy industry has already signaled receptivity to
phasing out its subsidy, just giving it enough time to come to scale
and then stand on its own. It's such a good idea, we should do the same
thing for the petroleum industry. After 100 years, the most profitable
commodity on the planet is mature and will be able to survive and even
thrive without additional tax incentives.
Finally, and most important, we should have the Federal Government
lead by example. The Department of Energy's management of four large
power marketing agencies should be the gold standard for integrating
renewables into the grid, upgrading transmission capacity, and leading
on conservation. The GSA, with over 300 million square feet of Federal
office space should demand that all our facilities, every square foot
we lease, buy, or build, should be of the highest energy efficiency.
The Federal fleet should be on the cutting edge of fuel efficiency
standards.
Finally, the Department of Defense, the largest consumer of energy in
the world, needs to redouble its efforts. The Pentagon is already
moving in the right direction. But it's not just about saving money in
the long term; it's providing operational flexibility and reducing
vulnerability from inefficient and dangerous fossil fuels. Those fuel
tanker trucks in Afghanistan and Iraq might as well have had great big
bull's eyes on them for terrorists. The military knows this, and we
should give maximum support even in a time of gradually reducing
Pentagon budgets. This will pay dividends for defense and to our
family's budget if the Pentagon gets it right.
It's clear that America is ready and equal to this challenge. The
President has signaled his interest and leadership. The question is
whether Congress is equal to the challenge, ready with innovation,
cooperation, and leadership.
[[Page H182]]
____________________