[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 166 (Friday, December 21, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S8355-S8356]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
COAST GUARD AND MARITIME TRANSPORTATION ACT
Mr. VITTER. Mr. President, I rise in support of H.R. 2838, Coast
Guard and Maritime Transportation Act of 2012, which we sent to the
President late last week. This important bill provides authorization
for all of the programs and missions of the United States Coast Guard,
along with provisions important to the maritime industry.
One important provision in the bill addresses the tonnage situation
of the vessel Aqueos Acadian. The system of tonnage measurement, though
arcane and complicated, is vital to the operation and economics of any
vessel. In the case of the Aqueos Acadian, its original configuration
in 1973 was certified in Coast Guard documentation to be 274 gross
registered tons, GRT, which is the official domestic tonnage
measurement. Later, the vessel had an addition of a closed-in shelter
deck, which increased its domestic tonnage, as well as its
international tonnage, which is measured differently than domestic
tonnage under the International Tonnage Convention, ITC, rules. Later
still, the modifications that increased the tonnage measurements were
removed, and the vessel's official documents were issued by the Coast
Guard and ABS to reflect that its GRT had been reduced to 275, almost
exactly the original tonnage.
Vessels with greater than 300 GRT have safety and manning
requirements much more complicated than vessels at or below 300 GRT. At
the time of the certification of the down-sizing modifications, the ITC
tonnage was not reduced because the Coast Guard's ability to reduce
international tonnage administratively is either extremely arcane or
non-existent--even if the vessel's tonnage has in fact been reduced.
When Aqueos Corporation in Louisiana purchased the vessel, its
official documents reflected that the GRT had been reduced to below 300
GRT. Relying on those Coast Guard and ABS issued documents, the company
sought Coast Guard administrative help to reduce the international
tonnage commensurate with the GRT. The Coast Guard bill includes
language that allows the company to keep operating the vessel under its
current documentation and allows time to complete the tonnage-reducing
modifications that were not done by the previous owners of the vessel
but that the Coast Guard has said must be done. Unfortunately, the ITC
tonnage reduction remains incomplete. The provision does not restore
the vessel's ITC tonnage to that of the GRT. This second step would
afford to the vessel the same result that other vessels in the Aqueos
Acadian's class have, through a previous legislative grandfather
provision, that allows those vessels' GRT and ITC tonnage to be the
same. This second step would not give the vessel a competitive
advantage relative to other vessels in the Acadian's class; rather,
without it the company is at a competitive disadvantage with those
other
[[Page S8356]]
vessels. As time goes by, the vessel is losing out on potentially
millions of dollars of domestic and international work.
It is not yet clear whether such an administrative solution can be
achieved. I understand the concern addressed by the ITC about vessels
having substantially changed size, and I agree that a larger vessel
should be regulated at a larger tonnage. Unfortunately, the way that
the ITC addresses this situation is to forever assign a vessel a higher
tonnage even if tonnage has been actually reduced. This vessel should
be recognized to its lower tonnage and should not be forced into a
regime that does not recognize its circumstance. I believe we should
seek additional legislative language that would correct the
international tonnage problem, but in the interim I look forward to
continuing to work with the Coast Guard and encourage the agency to
develop an administrative solution to this situation.
____________________