[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 160 (Wednesday, December 12, 2012)]
[House]
[Pages H6706-H6707]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
THE REAL VICTIMS OF SEQUESTRATION
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
Virginia (Mr. Connolly) for 5 minutes.
Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia. Mr. Speaker, we just heard a terrible cry
on behalf of the wealthy in the United States, that top 2 percent. Tax
them, and it will kill jobs, put people out of work.
If you want to know the real victims of sequestration, the real
victims of the Republican fight to protect that 2 percent at all costs,
it's the homeless, it's the poor, it's the lower income, and it's the
vulnerable amongst us.
Most of the debate up until now about the fiscal cliff has focused on
defense cuts and expiring tax cuts justifiably, but the ramifications
for local safety nets are equally portentous. In my district, for
example, Fairfax County recently kicked off its annual hypothermia
prevention program. During my tenure on the county board, I worked with
faith, business, and community leaders to open houses of worship and
other places to offer shelter from the cold and a hot meal for the
homeless, individuals, and families. It saves lives.
Last winter, the program served more than 1,000 clients in one of the
wealthiest districts in the United States. Sequestration threatens
support for this and other Federal homeless prevention efforts. The
McKinney-Vento homeless prevention program would be cut by as much as
$156 million. You didn't hear anything about that just now.
{time} 1020
You didn't hear anything about that just now, and it would leave more
than 145,000 more people out in the cold and at risk of dying from
hypothermia.
Similarly, families in every State rely on low-income heating
assistance, which stands to lose as much as $270 million in
sequestration. That may not seem like much, but that program has
already been cut by the Republicans by 30 percent. Millions of
Americans in every State rely on this support, including 145,000 in my
home State of Virginia.
The picture gets even worse when you look at the looming cuts to
Federal housing assistance. Programs like the Community Development
Block Grants, section 8 housing, and rental assistance for the needy
and senior citizens already have sustained dramatic cuts over the last
2 years under Republican control. The HOME Investment Partnership
Program, which supports homeownership and rental assistance, was cut by
more than $600 million, or 38 percent, last year alone. It faces
another $82 million cut in sequestration. Prince William County, in my
district, was one of the hardest-hit by foreclosures, and it has an
acute shortage of affordable housing right now. Cuts in Federal housing
support would further exacerbate that situation just as the local
housing market is beginning to recover.
There is an old proverb about someone always getting ``left out in
the cold,'' but in this case, people literally will be left out in the
cold if we allow sequestration to go forward.
Mr. Speaker, the cuts in housing assistance are just one piece of the
local safety net threatened by sequestration. I recently met with the
disability community in my district, and they, too, are anxious about
losing the vital support that allows disabled loved ones to live
independently. One local organization, for example, is providing work
opportunities and rehabilitative services to more than 650 disabled
adults in our community. Whether it's performing custodial services,
packing medical kits for our troops, working in food services or other
duties, these Ability One workers are making a positive difference in
providing autonomy for individuals in our community. I and many of my
colleagues here in the House, both Democrats and Republicans, are
Ability One champions, and we know firsthand the positive effect this
program has had, not only on the individuals, but on their families and
their friends.
Employment opportunities for the disabled and revenue from their work
reached an all-time high last year, but that momentum is at risk
because of looming cuts through sequestration. Community service
boards, for example, could lose as much as $52 million, which would
reduce services for more than 1.5 million people in America. You heard
my colleague talk about maybe a few hundred thousand jobs being at risk
if we cut taxes for the rich. What about these people? What about the
real cuts and real effects on real people in America?
What has been troubling to the residents of my district is the fact
that, up until now, the Republican alternative to these cuts has been
to shift even more of the burden, not less, onto the social safety net
programs. The sequestration replacement bill, which was pushed through
earlier by House Republicans, cuts $261 billion from safety net
programs. It eliminates social service block grants, which support
Meals on Wheels for 1.7 million seniors. Where is the concern for that?
It also provides child care assistance for low-income parents who are
returning to work. That plan cut $36 billion in nutrition assistance
for at-risk families. In my district, the demand for nutrition
assistance has jumped by 135 percent since the recession, and it has
gone up by 73 percent in the Commonwealth of Virginia during that same
time period.
Mr. Speaker, we cannot afford to turn our backs on these families.
Sequestration is a real threat. We need to
[[Page H6707]]
have a compromise and a deal now to help these families.
____________________