[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 156 (Thursday, December 6, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S7644-S7645]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
THE FISCAL CLIFF
Mr. McCONNELL. Yesterday afternoon I came to the floor and offered
President Obama's proposal on the fiscal cliff to show that neither he
nor Democrats in Congress are acting in good faith in these
negotiations.
With just a few weeks to go before a potentially devastating and
entirely avoidable blow to the economy, the President proposed a plan
that members of his own party won't even vote for. So I think it is
safe to say at this point that the President actually isn't interested
in a balanced agreement, he is not particularly interested in avoiding
the fiscal cliff, and he is clearly not interested at all in cutting
any spending.
What the President is interested in, as we learned yesterday, is
getting as much taxpayer money as he can, first by raising taxes on
small businesses that he believes are making too much money, and then
on everybody else. This is not so he can lower the debt or the deficit
but so he can spend to his heart's content. For months the President
has been saying all he wants is to raise taxes on the top 2 percent so
he can tackle the debt and the deficit.
However, yesterday he finally revealed that is not his true intent.
By demanding the power to raise the debt limit whenever he wants by as
much as he wants, he showed what he is after is assuming unprecedented
power to spend their dollars without any limit at all.
This isn't about getting a handle on deficits or debt for him. It is
about spending even more than he already has. Why else would he demand
the power to raise the debt limit on his own? And by the way, why on
Earth would we ever consider giving a President who has brought us 4
years of trillion-dollar unchecked deficits the authority to borrow? He
is the last person who should have limitless borrowing power.
Look, the only way we ever cut spending around here is by using the
debate over the debt limit to do it. Now the President wants to remove
that spur to cut altogether. Of course, it gets in the way of his
spending plans. Well, I assure you it is not going to happen. The
American people want Washington to get spending under control, and the
debt limit is the best tool we have to make the President take that
demand seriously. The American people want us to fight to cut spending.
It is a fight they deserve and a fight we are happy to have.
Unanimous Consent Request
Mr. President, I indicated to the majority leader that I was going to
propound the following consent. I am prepared to ask for consent to
allow the Senate to vote on the President's debt limit proposal. I
would ask this either as an amendment to the Russia PNTR measure we
will vote on this afternoon or as a freestanding bill, if that is
preferred. Therefore, I now ask unanimous consent that it be in order
to vote on an amendment, which is the President's debt limit extension
proposal that I just described, prior to the passage of the Russia PNTR
bill today.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Is there objection?
The majority leader.
Mr. REID. Reserving the right to object, I have been thinking how
best to describe what has been going on here on Capitol Hill the last
couple of weeks.
Every morning I get up, the first thing I read is the sports page. I
am disappointed in the sports page from the Washington Post. It is not
nearly as good as it used to be, and the New York Times is not very
good either, but I read them. There is always some good news on the
sports page. Then I go to the front page to get some of the bad news. I
follow sports no matter what it is--basketball, football, baseball,
whatever it is--and I have watched very closely.
It is not one of my favorite teams, but it is really fun to watch the
New York Jets. Coach Ryan has a problem. He has three quarterbacks:
Sanchez, Tim Tebow, and he has a guy by the name of McElroy. He can't
decide who their quarterback is going to be. That is the same problem
the Republicans are having. Romney is gone, but he is still in the
background. We have McConnell and we have Boehner. Who is the
quarterback, Mr. President? Who is the quarterback?
My friend talks about the trillions of dollars of debt. We just had
an election. The people overwhelmingly know why we have this debt. The
polling right before the election showed that the vast majority of the
American people realized the debt was caused by George Bush. That is a
fact.
We will have another jobs report out tomorrow. We had a little
problem because of what happened with Hurricane
[[Page S7645]]
Sandy, but we still have created about 100,000 new jobs. Private sector
job growth has been significant. We are approaching--let's see, it must
be about 4 million jobs now that have been created. That doesn't nearly
make up for what was lost during the Bush years, but we are making
progress.
People in America realize we can no longer have the top-down economy
the Republicans so loved during the Bush years and what they wanted to
create again with Governor Romney.
I would be happy to take a look at the proposal my friend the
Republican leader has shown us if we could come up with something like
we did when they created this other furor by refusing to increase the
debt, where we had an ability to come here and have a couple of votes
to determine if we were going to increase it. If that is what they want
to do again, I would be happy to seriously take a look at that and
report to the White House and my caucus, but until then I object.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Objection is heard.
The minority leader.
Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, my friend indicates that there is some
confusion about who the quarterback is on the Republican side. Of
course, that is quite common when you don't have a White House. But
there is no doubt about who the quarterback is on the Democratic side.
The quarterback on the Democratic side is the President of the United
States. Unfortunately, he keeps throwing interceptions, and we are
moving backward and backward and backward away from the goal line. We
have $4 trillion in annual deficits, and my friend from Nevada still
wants to blame that on George Bush? And now the President is asking for
unlimited--unlimited--authority to borrow whenever he wants to for
whatever amount he wants? If the majority leader supports that
proposal, I would hope we could work together and get a vote on it to
give his Members a chance to express themselves as to whether they
think that is a good way forward for our country--to give this
President or any other President unlimited authority to borrow as much
as he wants at any time he wants from the Chinese or anybody else. That
is the question.
Mr. REID. Mr. President, of course, as I said, I will be happy to
look at the proposal by my friend, but the President doesn't want to do
anything other than what we have done before, and that is where we are
now, and that is why I would be happy to take a look at his proposal,
because if it is what we did last summer, I would be happy to take a
look at that and move forward.
Mr. President, it is not only we Democrats, but we have a long line
of Republicans who, as I outlined early on, are recognizing that we
need to immediately make sure the middle class and the poor are taken
care of without their taxes being increased. We have Representatives
Cole, Scott; David Brooks, a columnist from the New York Times;
Senators Snowe, Collins, and Coburn; and a long list of Republicans
saying let's move on.
____________________