[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 154 (Tuesday, December 4, 2012)]
[House]
[Pages H6591-H6592]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
BUHLER, KANSAS, IS UNDER ASSAULT
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
Kansas (Mr. Pompeo) for 5 minutes.
Mr. POMPEO. Mr. Speaker, today I rise in support of the 1,300
citizens of
[[Page H6592]]
Buhler, Kansas--and indeed all Kansans--and in fact all Americans who
value religious freedom and religious liberty.
The citizens of Buhler are under assault. They are the latest victims
of an ungodly extortion racket perpetrated by the Freedom from Religion
Foundation based in Madison, Wisconsin.
On September 14, 2012, the Freedom from Religion Foundation sent a
letter to the mayor of the town of Buhler, Daniel Friesen, alerting him
to the foundation's intent to sue the city for its city seal, which
contained a cross, and for a billboard that included elements of that
city seal that was in a city park. Mr. Speaker, this is an outrage. The
seal and sign are harming no one; they are widely embraced by the
citizens of Buhler, Kansas.
The seal contains the words ``traditional values'' and ``progressive
ideas.'' Unfortunately, in this case, progressive ideas are making war
on traditional values, and it's high time for that to stop.
Some will claim that the First Amendment to the Constitution requires
the cross to be removed from this seal and sign. That's hogwash. The
First Amendment begins with the words: ``Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free
exercise thereof.'' In this instance, Congress made no law. For that
reason alone the First Amendment does not apply.
Furthermore, it cannot be said that this simple seal in any way is an
establishment of religion; meaning that there is no officially
supported sect or denomination here in the manner that some of the
American colonies had. This is not in any way an endorsement of any
particular religion or any religious denomination.
In short, the First Amendment, as originally written, has nothing to
do with this city's sign. Indeed, for the first 175 years of our
constitutional history, no one would have read the First Amendment in
any way that would have prevented this seal or this sign.
Mr. Speaker, in this very room in which I stand, this very Chamber,
right over my right-hand shoulder is a sign that says ``In God We
Trust.'' Near the rotunda of the Capitol is the Congressional Prayer
Room, a chapel that's been in use since 1955 as a place where Members
go to pray for divine guidance in debating the issues of the day. A
stained glass window there shows President George Washington kneeling
in prayer and the words of Psalm 16:1 surround him: ``Preserve me, O
God, for in thee do I put my trust.'' And a Holy Bible rests on the
alter beneath that window in this very building.
Of course I grant you that the First Amendment has been badly
interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court. Indeed, the 10th Circuit's
rulings are even more troubling. It could well be that in this case the
city would lose this case.
I don't fault the citizens of Buhler, Kansas, for the process that
they're going through in trying to figure out how to proceed. Indeed,
the Freedom from Religion Foundation knows this. They know that they've
attacked a city, threatened to sue a city with very few resources. We
will have a very difficult time battling an extended period of
litigation. I do not fault the folks in Buhler at all for trying to
figure out a way to move forward without resulting in litigation.
But why didn't the Freedom from Religion Foundation sue the United
States Congress for all that I spoke about just a minute ago? The
reason is obvious. The reason is they are being bullies. They are
seeking to put their secular vision in a place where they believe they
can do it without opposition, a place that has fewer resources. Folks
will face a very, very difficult decision about how the town and the
city should move forward.
Mr. Speaker, I hope that this assault on religion in the public
square will end soon. I am very saddened by the recent events in
Buhler, Kansas. I am angered by the extortionary tactics of the Freedom
from Religion Foundation. And, above all, I am determined to ensure
that the religious heritage of our great Nation will not be cast aside.
____________________