[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 144 (Tuesday, November 13, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6733]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
REQUEST FOR CONSULTATION
Mr. COBURN. Mr. President, I ask consent that the following letter be
printed in the Congressional Record.
There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in
the Record, as follows:
U.S. Senate,
November 13, 2012,
Hon. Mitch McConnell,
Senate Minority Leader,
U.S. Senate, Washington, DC.
Dear Senator McConnell: I am requesting that I be consulted
before the Senate enters into any unanimous consent
agreements or time limitations regarding H.R. 6062, Edward
Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program
Reauthorization Act of 2012.
I support the goals of this legislation and believe state
and local law enforcement agencies are a vital part of the
criminal justice system in this country. However, I believe
the responsibility to support, fund, and hold accountable
state and local law enforcement agencies lies with the states
and local communities these brave law enforcement officers
serve. Furthermore, while I do not believe this issue is the
responsibility of the federal government; if Congress does
act, we can and must do so in a fiscally responsible manner.
My concerns are included in, but not limited to, those
outlined in this letter.
While this bill is well-intentioned, it could cost the American
people approximately $800 million per year for 5 years without
corresponding offsets, totaling $4 billion. Furthermore, with the
exception of the extra stimulus funding in 2009 through the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), the Byrne Justice Assistance
Grant Program (JAG) has never received funding at the level authorized
in this legislation. According to the Congressional Research Service
(CRS), JAG funding has averaged $461 million per year since its first
appropriation in FY 2005, and appropriations have actually been
trending downward since that time. Without including the 2009 ARRA
funding, the most Congress has ever appropriated to Byrne JAG in a
single year is $546 million in FY 2009. I recognize this legislation
reduces the overall authorization for the Byrne JAG program; however, I
do not believe this reduction is sufficient to address the growing
federal spending problem in this country.
It is irresponsible for Congress to jeopardize the future
standard of living of our children by borrowing from future
generations. The U.S. national debt is now over $16 trillion.
That means over $51,000 in debt for each man, woman and child
in the United States. A year ago, the national debt was $14.7
trillion. Despite pledges to control spending, Washington
adds billions to the national debt every single day. In just
one year, our national debt has grown by $19 trillion or
8.8%.
In addition to these fiscal concerns, there are several
problems specific to this legislation. First, the Byrne JAG
program duplicates other sources of federal funding. State
and local governments can use Byrne JAG funds for projects in
seven different purpose areas: (1) law enforcement programs;
(2) prosecution and court programs; (3) prevention and
education programs; (4) corrections and community corrections
programs; (5) drug treatment programs; (6) planning,
evaluation, and technology improvement programs; and (7)
crime victim and witness programs. Several of these broad
purpose areas are already covered by other federal grant
programs including Community Oriented Policing Services
(COPS), Second Chance Act grants, drug and mental health
court grants, and the Debbie Smith DNA Backlog Grant program,
among others.
Second, Congress, particularly the Senate, has not performed
sufficient oversight of the Byrne JAG program to justify its
reauthorization at this time. Before reauthorizing this or any program,
Congress should perform oversight to determine how a grant program is
performing, evaluate how grantees use federal funds, measure the
results of the program, and analyze whether there are other federal
programs funding the same purposes. In my federal deficit reduction
plan, Back in Black, I noted that critics on the right and left, along
with the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General, agree
Byrne JAG experiences waste, fraud, and abuse in a variety of ways and
should be reformed. Thus, I do not believe Congress should blindly
reauthorize this program without oversight through a detailed review of
its policies and practices.
Finally, I do not believe the federal government has the
authority under the Constitution to provide federal funds to
state and local governments for use on state and local
criminal justice systems. Article I, Section 8 of the
Constitution enumerates the limited powers of Congress, and
nowhere are we tasked with funding or becoming involved with
state and local criminal issues.
There is no question state and local law enforcement play a vital
role in maintaining order and safety in many communities. However, I
believe this issue is the responsibility of the states and not the
federal government. Despite these constitutional limitations, if
Congress does act in this area we should evaluate the program as most
American individuals and companies must do with their own resources; we
should review current programs, determine any needs that may exist, and
prioritize those needs for funding by cutting from the federal budget
programs fraught with waste, fraud, abuse, and duplication.
Sincerely,
Tom A. Coburn, M.D.,
United States Senator.
____________________