[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6159]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
{time} 1050
VOTER DISENFRANCHISEMENT
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
Arizona (Mr. Grijalva) for 5 minutes.
Mr. GRIJALVA. Mr. Speaker, this week marks the United States
Constitution's 225th anniversary.
Our Constitution is a product of realistic compromise and intelligent
consensus--a trait, I might add, sorely missing in this Chamber.
It lays out the central principles for a democratic government and
the rights that citizens can expect to enjoy in that government. With
the inclusion of six voting rights amendments, we have formed a more
solid democracy.
The voting rights amendments fundamentally changed our system of
government--outlawing poll taxes in Federal elections, giving ordinary
Americans the right to elect their Senators, allowing the citizens of
our Nation's Capital to vote for President, and guaranteeing that all
Americans--regardless of race, religion, gender, or age--would enjoy
these protections.
With these protections and these amendments, we affirmed the inherent
values of our Constitution and our democracy.
The right to vote is still, to this day, the essential piece of our
democracy.
Think about it. To deny an eligible voter the opportunity to vote is
to undermine the very freedom that defines us as a Nation. The right to
vote is essential to our democracy.
However, while the marches of student demonstrators and religious
leaders once drove electoral reform in the United States, a new and
dark movement is sweeping across the country. State lawmakers have been
pushed by corporate interests and driven by a cynical point of view
that says: We must deny other people the right to vote in order to
continue to keep our power, and we must target those groups and
individuals who may not agree with our point of view. With this cynical
selective process, we keep power and we only concentrate on the people
and extend the privileges to those that agree with our point of view.
New voter laws that are now being proposed and have passed in State
legislatures make voter registration more difficult and cumbersome, cut
the availability of early voting, and require voters to present current
government-issued identifications as a prerequisite to casting a
ballot. These efforts threaten the integrity of our democratic system
and are very clearly targeted.
The new restrictions on voting would disproportionately burden
African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, young voters, and
Americans new to the political process.
Plain and simple, these restrictive voter laws threaten to
disenfranchise young, poor, minority, and elderly voters who lack
formal government-issued IDs despite the fact that it is more likely
that an American will be struck and killed by lightning than he would
impersonate another voter at the polls. We know exactly what these
voter suppression laws mean.
In Texas, a Federal court recently found that the Texas voter ID law
violated the Voting Rights Act because it made it harder for African
Americans and Latinos to vote. The court stated that evidence
conclusively shows that the cost of obtaining a qualified ID will fall
more heavily on the poor, and a disproportionate number of African
Americans and Latinos in Texas live in poverty.
In Pennsylvania, a July 5 Philadelphia Inquirer article reported that
758,000 registered voters in Pennsylvania do not have an ID, a new
State law requirement for voting. That figure represents 9.2 percent of
the State's voters that could be stopped from voting.
A report by the Brennan Center for Justice found that allegations of
widespread voter fraud often proved greatly exaggerated. Moreover,
these claims of voter fraud are frequently used to justify policies
that do not solve the alleged wrongs but could well disenfranchise
legitimate voters.
In some States, veterans' ID cards won't be sufficient as a photo ID
to vote.
In the last 12 months in my State of Arizona, there has been an
accelerated effort to suppress the vote. These new efforts represent a
coordinated effort clearly designed to suppress the vote of those
people who need to make sure that their government is paying attention
to their needs.
People of color, women, young people literally risked, and some lost,
their lives to gain the right to vote in this Nation of ours.
Throughout its history, our country has tried to remove obstacles to
voter participation, making the right to vote accessible to all
eligible citizens.
We cannot turn our back on that fundamental right. Our legacy as a
Nation demands better of us.
____________________