[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[House]
[Pages H5928-H5929]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
TAKE POLITICS OUT OF THE POST OFFICE
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
Georgia (Mr. Johnson) for 5 minutes.
Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to urge my
colleagues in this do-nothing Congress to take politics out of the post
office.
The post office was explicitly authorized in article I, section 8,
clause 7 of the United States Constitution. It
[[Page H5929]]
began its operations on July 26, 1775, and Ben Franklin was appointed
the first Postmaster General. That's a long time ago.
It has a legal obligation to serve everyone, regardless of geography,
and at a uniform cost with uniform services. And it has exclusive
access to boxes that are marked ``U.S. Postal'' or ``U.S. Post
Office.'' And it also competes with private package delivery services.
In 2006, Congress forced the United States Postal Service to pre-fund
100 percent of retiree insurance premiums. No other company, public or
private, is forced to comply with such an unnecessary and destructive
policy.
Mr. Speaker, House Republicans cited declining mail volumes and a
growing labor force as the primary reasons why the 2006 legislation was
necessary. Yet 2005, 2006, and 2007 were the highest volume years in
U.S. Postal Service history. In fact, 2006 was the highest volume year
ever.
Mr. Speaker, the real motivation behind the 2006 legislation was to
break the back of a public sector union and privatize the mailing
industry. Why else would Congress alter an entity that hasn't taken a
dime of United States taxpayers' money in 30 years?
According to the Congressional Research Service, the U.S. Postal
Service was self-supporting since 1971, using postage sales to fund
operations. The Postal Service was so profitable that it returned money
to the Treasury every single year, while providing free services to the
visually impaired and persons overseas.
If the Postal Service was a private corporation, or if it had been a
private corporation at that time, my colleagues across the aisle would
have hailed it as the model of economic success and sung its praises
from sea to shining sea.
Since the pre-funding mandate of 2006, however, the Postal Service
has nearly crumbled under the weight of its pension costs. How does an
organization that had robust profits for 30 years, leading up to the
2006 legislation, suddenly start running deficits and lose $25 billion
between 2007 and 2011?
How did the U.S. Postal Service go from no debt in 2006 to over $13
billion in debt today?
Many of my colleagues on the other side have well-connected friends
who advocate for Postal Service privatization. I'm here to connect the
dots for the American people.
Instead of wasting time today, this do-nothing Congress should vote
to stop the damage inflicted upon the United States Postal Service by
passing H.R. 1351. This bipartisan postal reform bill protects the
hardworking employees of the Postal Service.
The U.S. Postal Service was not in danger of becoming insolvent until
Congress decided to meddle in its affairs. It's hypocritically
inconsistent for my friends on the other side of the aisle to talk
about government being the problem, while they don't acknowledge that
they created a big problem for the post office. It is hypocritical.
Mr. Speaker, the Postal Service already missed a $5.5 billion payment
in August. Congress must act before the post office defaults on another
payment later this month. Instead of scheduling political votes that
highlight our differences, let's stop the madness and do what is in the
best interest of the American people, the economy, and communities
across the Nation.
The Postal Service employs 700,000 of our fellow citizens, over
17,000 of whom are from my State of Georgia.
{time} 1040
One-third are military veterans who deliver 212 billion pieces of
mail to over 144 million locations. This is the middle class that's
doing this. If privatization advocates like the Koch brothers get their
wish, the Postal Service will slowly be destroyed, causing good jobs to
be lost and allowing companies to raise prices of delivery. Taking
action to strengthen the Postal Service's finances is not just good for
the letter carriers and postmasters; it's also good for business. There
is $1.3 trillion in mailing industry proceeds out there that support 7
million private sector jobs. The time to act, ladies and gentlemen, is
now.
____________________