[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 121 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6075-S6083]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
VETERANS JOBS CORPS ACT OF 2012--MOTION TO PROCEED
Mr. REID. I move to proceed to Calendar No. 476, S. 3457.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The clerk will report the motion.
The legislative clerk read as follows:
Motion to proceed to Calendar No. 476, S. 3457, a bill to
require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a
veterans jobs corps, and for other purposes.
Schedule
Mr. REID. Mr. President, the first hour will be equally divided
between the two leaders or their designees. The majority will control
the first half and the Republicans will control the final half. At 11
a.m. there will be a moment of silence in observance of the 11th
anniversary of the attacks on September 11, 2001. The Senate will
recess from 12:30 p.m. until 2:15 p.m. for the weekly caucus meetings.
At 2:15 p.m. there will be a cloture vote on the motion to proceed to
S. 3457, the Veterans Jobs Corps Act.
Measures Placed on the Calendar--H.R. 8, S. 3522, S. 3525
Mr. President, I am told there are three bills at the desk due for a
second reading.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The clerk will read the titles of
the bills for a second time.
A bill (H.R. 8) to extend certain tax relief provisions
enacted in 2001 and 2003, and to provide for expedited
consideration of a bill providing for comprehensive tax
reform, and for other purposes.
A bill (S. 3522) to provide for the expansion of affordable
refinancing of mortgages held by the Federal National
Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation.
A bill (S. 3525) to protect and enhance opportunities for
recreational hunting, fishing, and shooting, and for other
purposes.
Mr. REID. Mr. President, I object to all three bills that were read
for the second time.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The objection having been heard,
the bills will be placed on the calendar.
Commemorating September 11
Mr. REID. Mr. President, just a short way from this Chamber, in S-
209, we have been meeting for many years as a Senate Democratic
leadership to discuss the issues of the week. We just finished a
meeting there, and part of the discussion today in that meeting was
what happened 11 years ago at the exact same time we were meeting
there. I can remember that so clearly. I will never, ever forget that.
It is implanted in my mind so clearly. I was the first one to get to
that meeting, and Senator Breaux from Louisiana came in and said: There
is something going on in New York. Let's turn on the TV. And we did.
Senators started coming in. It appeared an airplane hit one of the
towers, and we were wondering why it would have done that. Something
was obviously wrong.
Senator Daschle was the leader at the time. He started the meeting,
and the TV was off. The meeting was just getting started, and someone
came in to take Senator Daschle out of that meeting. He came back very
quickly and said: There is a plane headed for the Capitol, and we all
have to evacuate the Capitol--everybody. The alarm went out and people
were rushing down these halls leaving. I can remember leaving that room
over here and looking out the window and seeing the smoke billowing
from what we
[[Page S6076]]
learned is now the Pentagon. It was on fire; a plane had hit it. There
was still one plane in the air, and that was headed for the Capitol. As
I have indicated, even though that was 11 years ago, I remember the
sight as if it were yesterday. We have many meetings in that room, and
I often think of what transpired that morning as I looked out toward
the Pentagon.
Over the last decade, our country has begun to heal from the wounds
of that terrible, terrible attack. It was attacks by terrorists. The
scars remain. The scars are deeper with some than others, but no matter
how many years pass, we will never forget the thousands of innocent
people who died in New York, Pennsylvania, and across the river here in
Virginia. There were mothers and fathers, sons and daughters, brothers
and sisters, spouses and friends. All they were doing was their jobs,
and others were just catching a plane to go visit loved ones or on a
business trip. It is good that we pause each year to pay tribute and to
remember, and that will occur here on the Senate floor, as I previously
announced. There will also be a ceremony out in front of the Capitol.
The memories of that dark day in our shared history are painful, but
they give me hope as well. They give me hope because on September 11
and during the difficult months that followed, Americans showed the
world that our unified Nation can fight back against darkness and fear.
Democrats were not alone in fighting back. Republicans were not alone
in fighting back. We were all fighting back together in the face of
great evil, and that is what it was. There were so many who rushed
forward to show great courage, enormous dignity, and kindness.
Today we pause to remember the firefighters who rushed into the World
Trade Center knowing they might never come out, and a lot of them
didn't come out. We pause to remember the police officers and rescue
workers who hurried to the scene, combed through the debris, and
shepherded New Yorkers to safety. Some of them gave their lives that
day. We pause to remember the bravery of the members of our Nation's
Armed Forces, our intelligence community, and Foreign Service, as well
as the sacrifices of their families. They have borne the burdens of war
for more than a decade. They have given their blood, sweat, and too
often their lives in the effort to crush al-Qaida, bring Osama bin
Laden to justice, and keep America safe. We pause to remember the
unbreakable spirit of those valiant people and certainly the United
States of America.
Recognition of the Minority Leader
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Republican leader is
recognized.
9/11 Remembrance
Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, in the course of a lifetime, one always
remembers those moments of national grief and anxiety. They don't
happen very often. From my parents' generation, it was: Where were you
when you heard about the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor? When I was a
young man and my friend the majority leader was a young man, it was:
Where were you when you heard about the assassination of President
Kennedy? For the current generation, it was, of course: Where were you
when you heard about 9/11?
As the majority leader has indicated, it was for us here at the
Capitol kind of close up and personal, if you will. I recall being late
that morning, and as a result of not yet having gotten to work, I saw,
as millions of Americans did, the second plane go into the second
building in real time. As the majority leader has indicated, the
building was subsequently evacuated. People scattered around town, and
at the end of this horrendous and frightening day, we all gathered on
the steps of the Capitol to sing ``God Bless America.'' It was one of
the most uplifting and unifying moments in the history of our country.
I think it is safe to say that we are, as a nation, even though we have
our political differences, together and stronger in the wake of what
happened.
In what is now a time-honored tradition, later this morning we will
gather on the Capitol steps to mark a solemn anniversary of the 9/11
attacks. It is fitting that we remember the thousands of innocent men
and women who died that morning 11 years ago and that despite our
political differences, we remember the unity and resolve we all felt
that day. In the days and weeks that followed the horrific attacks on
our homeland, we were united by a common grief and outrage. Some
wondered what the future would bring, but 11 years later I think I can
say that America is stronger than it was on 9/11.
Today we honor the sacrifice of those who died that day and the
millions who have stepped forward to defend the Nation in the Armed
Forces and intelligence services in the years since, especially those
who have given their lives in that service. On 9/11 we showed the world
that America does not shrink from a challenge, and every day since
courageous men and women have humbled us through their courage and
sacrifice on our behalf. Today is the day to show them our deep
gratitude and to renew our commitment to live lives worthy of their
sacrifice.
Reservation of Leader Time
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Under the previous order, the
leadership time is reserved.
Morning Business
Under the previous order, the next hour will be equally divided and
controlled between the two leaders or their designees, with the
majority controlling the first half.
The Senator from Illinois.
Remembering 9/11
Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, it is difficult to come to the floor of
the Senate on this anniversary of 9/11 and not reflect on your own
experience. I was in the same room as the majority leader, Harry Reid,
just a few steps from the Senate Chamber when we witnessed the second
plane on television crashing into the World Trade Center and realized
it was no accident, and then the black smoke billowing over the Mall
from the Pentagon suggested we were under attack.
As we evacuated this building and rushed outside, standing, the crowd
around, not knowing which way to turn, was looking for a safe place to
go. No one knew. Some tourists came up to me and said: We are new here.
Where are we supposed to go next? There was no place to tell them to
go. We knew Union Station was nearby and the Metro station not far
away, but there was no other place to turn.
I might add parenthetically that the decision was made shortly
thereafter to build the Visitor Center. It took us years to do it. It
is an underground facility which is safe and I am glad we have it. It
has been used every single day and is an important addition to the
Capitol.
President George W. Bush faced that extraordinary challenge as
Commander in Chief and President of the United States to deal with 9/
11. There were some aspects of his response which I may have disagreed
with, but I certainly commend him still for his leadership in that
anxious moment after the tragedy of 9/11. I especially wish to thank
him and commend him for reminding us time and time again when he was
President that our enemies are not the people of the Islamic religion
nor those of the Sikh religion; our enemies are those who corrupt
religion in the name of terrorism.
Many people of the Muslim faith in America--good, patriotic
Americans--face discrimination simply because those who were
perpetrators of 9/11 claim to have shared that religion. It is a good
day to be reminded of the thoughtful leadership of George W. Bush in
telling us our enemy is not Islam; our enemies are those who corrupt
the religion in the name of terrorism.
I also received a note over August from two friends of mine who live
in New Bern, NC, Ed and Beth Edmundson. I met them several years ago in
Chicago when their son Eric, who is a veteran of the U.S. Army and
served in Iraq, was hospitalized in that city. What a story. Eric
Edmundson had been serving our country and was injured. During the
course of his injuries and subsequent treatment, he became
quadriplegic. After months and months of effort, the Veterans'
Administration basically told his family there was no place to turn.
They said to his father: You are going to have to buy him a wheelchair
and find a place for him in a nursing home facility. Eric was a young
man, obviously, and married with a little baby at home. His dad and mom
showed the kind of courage and love which touches our hearts.
[[Page S6077]]
Ed Edmundson said: My son, in his twenties, is not going into a
nursing home. I will not let it happen. I am going to find a place that
will treat him.
He ended up finding on his own the Rehabilitation Institute of
Chicago, which is one of the best hospitals in the world. Eric was a
patient there, going through rehabilitation from his injuries he
suffered in Iraq. That is when I met his parents. They invited me to
come see him. I did, and I promised I would return. I did a few weeks
later just to visit, and they said: Eric has a gift for you. Eric, who
would smile but didn't speak, was sitting in his wheelchair. His father
and mother came over to his side, each grabbed an elbow, stood him up,
and Eric took three steps. It was an amazing, emotional moment without
a dry eye in that hospital room. They put him back in his wheelchair
and his dad said: My son is going to walk out of this hospital in his
full dress uniform. He said: Can you make it? We would like to have you
there. I said: I wouldn't miss it. Many of us were there. The mayor of
the city of Chicago, many elected officials, and all the news cameras
were there to watch this heroic young man walk out of the Rehab
Institute of Chicago--just a few steps--but in his full dress uniform
with a smile on his face. He went home to New Bern, NC. His father
literally left his business, the father and mother moved in with Eric,
his wife, and baby and tried to make a life for him. The wonderful
organizations and people in that community built a home that was
wheelchair accessible for the whole family. I went to visit him there
in North Carolina. They were taking Eric hunting. He was involved in
many things in rehabilitation. They sent a card, a family card with
pictures of all of them, and it is a joy to see it.
One of the last things Eric's father asked me to do was to look at a
piece of legislation Hillary Clinton introduced but was not passed. It
was called the Caregivers Act. The Caregivers Act said if a disabled
veteran comes home and has the loving care of a member of the family
and can stay home, we should try to help that member of the family by
providing them with the training they need to take care of their
disabled vet at home, give them a respite with visiting nurses or
people from the VA so they can have some time to themselves, and if
there is an economic hardship on the family, give them a monthly
stipend so they can continue in their home.
I called Senator Clinton and asked her if I could take up the bill
now that she was off to the State Department. She said: Please do. I
did. Thanks to the great support of Senator Danny Akaka and Senator Pat
Murray, we passed it. The Caregivers Act is now helping literally
hundreds of family caregivers across the United States care for their
disabled veteran at home. It is helping the Edmundson family and other
families I have met in Illinois.
I tell that story because when we talk of the real cost of 9/11, it
is not only the massive tragedy of the lives that were lost on that day
and the families affected by those lives and those wonderful first
responders who risked and gave their lives, but it is also the lives of
the men and women in uniform who served us well, many of whom are
carrying the scars of war for the rest of their lives--a lifetime--who
still will always need our commitment and further devotion to make sure
they are taken care of. The Edmundson family in North Carolina comes to
mind immediately and so many others just like them as a reminder of
what we need to do, the obligations we have as a government to the
people who have served us so well in the military.
We have a bill that is coming up and I hope we can, in that same
spirit, consider it on a bipartisan basis and pass it. It is an effort
to give returning veterans a better chance to get a job. It is a
disappointment--more than that, it is a disgrace--that many of these
veterans come home and find themselves unemployed and sometimes even
homeless. This Veterans Job Corps Act, which is coming before the
Senate this afternoon, should pass with an overwhelming vote. This bill
is fully paid for, and it is a bill Senator Murray has brought to the
floor along with the leadership of Senator Bill Nelson of Florida, who
has been especially dedicated to this proposal.
President Obama first mentioned it in his State of the Union Address.
It includes several veterans employment initiatives such as the
improved one-stop shop centers for job searching and smoother State
certification and licensing. It authorizes $1 billion for the Veterans
Job Corps over 5 years and $900 million to employ 20,000 veterans in
conservation resource management, historic preservation projects and
public lands, and $100 million for COPS and SAFER grants to hire
veterans to serve in capacities as police and firemen. Iraq and
Afghanistan veterans are given preference for all these positions.
The bill creates a pilot program to improve veteran job searches by
providing veterans with access to the Internet and computers to assist
them. It also provides military transition assistance programs to
eligible veterans and their spouses at sites outside military
installations to make it easier to find a job. Rather than the current
uneven State-by-State approach, the bill requires all States, as a
condition for receiving veteran employment and training funding, to
consider military training and experience when granting State
certifications and licensing.
How many times have we heard about this? I sure have. Someone who
served in the military, driven vehicles, been involved in some
technical capacity, and then they come out and have to start from
scratch, all over again, in each of our States to qualify for
certification for a good-paying job. Let's take into account that they
have been trained by the best military in the world and give them
credit for the experience and training they have in the military and
this bill does that.
Also, the VA will ensure each State receives funding for at least one
disabled veterans outreach program specialist and one local veterans
unemployment representative for every 5,000 square miles. That is not
too much. It is too little, frankly, but it is an important start.
This bill is paid for and it is a good bill. I hope we can pass it
this afternoon in the spirit of 9/11, remembering, sadly, the victims
who lost their lives that day and the first responders who gave
everything they could give to try to save them; but also remembering
those men and women, many of whom were inspired by 9/11 to enlist in
our military, to risk their lives--and many gave their lives--over
6,500 to date. It is a reminder that we have an ongoing moral
obligation to stand behind those veterans.
I might also add there is a lot of talk about the deficit and cutting
spending, and I know that has to happen. I was on the Simpson-Bowles
Commission and I understood that if we are going to bring our deficit
under control, we have to cut spending, look to real entitlement
reform, and raise revenue. If we don't do all three, then, frankly, we
will not achieve our goal.
We have seen a budget proposed by the House Republican budget leader,
Congressman Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, the Republican nominee for Vice
President, which, unfortunately, does not reach that goal because he
preserves tax cuts for the highest income people in this country
instead of asking for some sacrifice, some effort that they pay their
fair share. He extends spending in the Department of Defense at beyond
wartime levels, despite the fact that President Obama has successfully
brought the war in Iraq to a close and is doing the same in
Afghanistan. We can't do those two things and reach real deficit
reduction in a meaningful way and in a timely way. Unfortunately,
Congressman Ryan's budget does not pass the basic test of arithmetic.
When we consider important spending such as this veterans job corps
bill, I hope we find ways to pay for them to offset, and that when we
talk about deficit reduction, we never do it at the expense of our
veterans and we never do it at the expense of our national security. I
hope we do it honestly, acknowledging the fact that when it comes to
the Pentagon, there are areas where we can save money and not
compromise our security in any way whatsoever.
I thank the Presiding Officer for presiding at this historic moment.
I will mention that at 11 o'clock the House and Senate Democrats and
Republicans will gather on the east front for the commemoration of the
9/11 anniversary. We will be in session on the floor. I will be here
asking for a moment of
[[Page S6078]]
silence as they will at the same time outside.
It is a somber day in Washington as we recall this great national
tragedy, but it is a day of great hope because we saw how America
responded on a bipartisan basis and the great people who stepped
forward and showed such extraordinary acts of courage since that day.
I yield the floor and suggest the absence of a quorum.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. UDALL of Colorado. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that
the order for the quorum call be rescinded.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, it is so
ordered.
Wind Production Tax Credit
Mr. UDALL of Colorado. Mr. President, I return to the Senate floor to
pick up where I left off when Congress adjourned 1 month ago and that
is to continue with my daily efforts to urge this Congress, our
Congress, the House and the Senate, to extend the wind production tax
credit. I rise before the Senate to discuss an industry that has
created tens of thousands of good-paying jobs for American workers and
has contributed billions of dollars--literally billions of dollars--to
our economy.
I think the Presiding Officer knows this, and all our colleagues
should know this: This is an industry that will be in grave trouble if
we in the Congress don't act soon--I actually mean immediately--to
extend the wind production tax credit.
We return this week to Congress in the wake of really sobering news
about recent layoffs of American workers in our wind industry, largely
due to our congressional inaction on the wind production tax credit.
I want to be very clear: The wind industry has already begun firing
American workers because we have failed to extend the wind production
tax credit. It is that simple. You ask: Why? Well, the PTC has been a
driver of the wind industry's enormous expansion in the United States,
as well as the growing investment in American workers that we have seen
in the last several years. This critical tax credit expires at the end
of the year, and if we do not vote to extend it, manufacturing
facilities may shut down, thousands more Americans will lose their
jobs, and the negative economic ripple effect--this is not a positive
ripple effect; this is a negative ripple effect--will be felt in
communities all across our Nation.
Now, let me be clear in a further way. It has already happened; this
is not conjecture. In my home State of Colorado, workers who had good-
paying jobs in the wind industry just a month ago when I stood here no
longer do. That is right. Over 100 Coloradans were let go of their jobs
in the Colorado wind industry just in the last month. There are more
job losses projected to follow. That is sobering to all of us.
On a more upbeat note, I come to the floor to talk about the
production tax credit, and each time I have come to the floor I focus
on a particular State because there is good news all across our country
when it comes to wind energy. Today I want to focus on Vermont where
the wind industry has grown faster than in many larger States. As a
matter of fact, Vermont has the second highest rate of new wind
installations of any State in 2011, growing over 650 percent. That is
right, 650 percent growth in Vermont.
Vermont has numerous installed wind projects and wind manufacturing
sites throughout the State that currently power over 11,000 homes and
enough wind power potential to provide 160 percent of the State's
current electricity needs.
One of America's leading wind energy production companies is NRG
Systems, which is based in Chittenden County, which is up in the
northwestern corner of Vermont. For 30 years, NRG Systems has been a
fixture in Vermont's energy and technology industry, and it serves the
wind industry in particular by providing developers, utilities, and
turbine manufacturers with the tools they need to measure the wind. But
with the looming end of the PTC, NRG's future growth in Vermont is
uncertain.
This is very clear because for the first time in their history, NRG
has had to lay off workers in Vermont, not once but twice this year.
Their very capable CEO, Jan Blittersdorf, described these firings as
``deeply unfortunate, though necessary . . . to preserve our future in
the face of a deeply unstable wind-energy industry.''
NRG's orders are off 50 percent from just a few years ago because of
our inaction. The uncertainty about wind energy's future has encouraged
them to look overseas for new opportunities, which then means we hasten
the departure of good-paying jobs for skilled American workers who
already are ready to go.
So the point I am trying to make--and I see my colleague from Vermont
has joined me; I look forward to hearing his remarks--the wind industry
needs certainty. NRG is an example of a company that needs certainty.
We can lead the world in sustainable, smart energy, but we have to
extend the PTC to stay on track.
As I have said for all these weeks I have been coming to the floor,
this is not just about my home State of Colorado. I love my State of
Colorado. I think we are the best State in the Union. But our country
at large is threatened by the broad losses of jobs if we do not extend
the production tax credit.
I am not going to stand by idly and observe the outsourcing of
American jobs. I do not want to cede the leadership in the clean energy
future to any of our foreign competitors. That is why I keep coming
back day after day to urge my colleagues to work with me to pass the
production tax credit.
It is pretty simple. The production tax credit equals jobs. We ought
to pass it as soon as possible. It is common sense. We have support
from both sides of the aisle.
I mentioned my great friend, Senator Sanders. He has joined me. I
also want to mention the esteemed chairman of the Judiciary Committee,
the senior Senator from Vermont, Senator Sanders' colleague, was unable
to join us this morning, but he is a strong supporter of the PTC, and
he will be making a statement as well.
So let me close by urging all of us, as soon as possible, to extend
the wind production tax credit. Let's not let party affiliation or
partisan politics interfere with what is right. Without the wind PTC,
more Americans will be out of work, and we will have further neglected
our duty to pass commonsense policies that help American workers build
a better future for themselves and their families. Every day we do not
act is a day that more companies like NRG Systems in Vermont are forced
to lay off workers in our country. These companies are then looking
overseas for better opportunities. That is just flat-out unacceptable.
Mr. President, I conclude. I want my colleagues to know I will be
back on the floor tomorrow to talk further about this opportunity but
also this threat. I will be back to talk about jobs, our economy, the
need for America to lead in the clean energy space, and the need for
Congress to take action today.
I thank the ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore for his attention.
Again, I want to acknowledge the great leadership of my friend from
Vermont. I look forward to hearing his remarks on this important
production tax credit.
With that, I yield the floor.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Senator from Vermont.
Mr. SANDERS. Mr. President, let me begin by thanking Senator Mark
Udall for his continued focus on ensuring that Congress extends the
production tax credit. Senator Udall has been down on the Senate floor
time after time after time on this important issue, and we all owe him
a deep debt of gratitude. I thank the Senator very much.
I also want to thank him for his very kind words about the NRG
company. We hope when the Senator visits us in Vermont, he will see it.
They are a cutting-edge company. They are an extraordinary company, and
we are very proud of the work they have done and are doing, and we are
cognizant of the problems they are facing today, the layoffs they have
had to experience because Congress has not passed the production tax
credit.
Mr. President, as you know, this important incentive, the production
tax
[[Page S6079]]
credit, moves us forward in a direction that we must go in terms of
producing safe, sustainable energy by providing a 2.2-cent-per-
kilowatt-hour incentive for wind energy produced.
Let's be very clear--and I think a lot of people, perhaps, in
Congress and certainly all over the country do not fully grasp this. I
think some people still think wind is some kind of cute fringe
technology which is not very significant in the United States of
America. So let's be very clear: Wind accounts for 35 percent of all
new electric-generating capacity installed in our country over the last
5 years, more new electricity capacity during that time than nuclear
and coal combined. Let me repeat that. Wind accounts for 35 percent of
all new electric-generating capacity installed in our country over the
last 5 years. This is not some untested fringe technology; it is
mainstream.
Wind today is producing electricity at very competitive rates.
According to the Department of Energy, wind is producing electricity
from between 4 to 7 cents per kilowatt hour. That happens to be far
cheaper than electricity produced by new nuclear plants. Today the
United States has over 48,000 megawatts of wind, and Texas alone has
over 10,000 megawatts. Iowa and South Dakota have achieved the
milestone of getting 20 percent or more of their electricity from wind.
Once again, this is not a fringe technology. This is a technology that
is growing and is cost effective.
In my State of Vermont, we are home to leading wind companies such as
Northern Power in Barre and NRG Systems in Hinesburg. These companies
sell wind energy products globally and create good-paying jobs in the
State of Vermont. The wind industry supports over 470 manufacturing
plants nationally and some 78,000 jobs from one end of our country to
the other.
If Congress fails to act on the wind tax credit, we could see a
hemorrhaging of some 37,000 wind energy jobs in the next year. We have
already seen wind job losses in Vermont due in part to the uncertainty.
If one opposes the production tax credit, this is what they are saying
to construction workers who want to build wind farms next year: Sorry;
you are out of work. In the middle of this severe recession, we should
not be saying that.
Those opposing the wind credit say Congress should ``not pick winners
and losers.'' Unfortunately, for many decades, for better or for worse,
Congress has picked winners and losers. That is just the simple
reality. One big winner is the fossil fuel industry, which is set to
receive over $113 billion in subsidies over the next 10 years. So when
folks come to the floor and say: We do not want to pick winners and
losers, we do not want to give tax breaks and tax credits for wind or
solar, the truth is that in a 10-year period, the fossil fuel industry
will receive over $113 billion in subsidies.
These subsidies include rather incredible loopholes, such as allowing
BP to take a tax writeoff for the cost of cleaning up their disastrous
oilspill in the gulf. Many of these tax subsidies for Big Oil and coal
corporations never phase out and never expire.
Another big winner in terms of support from the Federal Government is
the nuclear power industry. They get tens of billions of dollars in
Federal research and development. They get risky multibillion-dollar
Federal loan guarantees for new plants, and they get the Federal Price-
Anderson liability insurance program, which has been conveniently
extended for over a half a century.
I raise these points to suggest that what we are asking for is fairly
modest compared to what the fossil fuel industry and the nuclear power
industry receive. It is absurd that Congress continues huge subsidies
for the fossil fuel industry, for the nuclear power industry, and yet
is resisting providing support for safe and sustainable energy such as
wind.
If we are serious about job creation and putting construction workers
back to work, if we are serious about reversing global warming and
cutting back on greenhouse gas emissions, we must be investing in the
growing sustainable energy sector. At a modest cost compared to the
huge subsidies for fossil fuels and nuclear, an extension of the
production tax credit can provide wind energy companies the certainty
they need to invest in job creation in America.
I wish to congratulate Senator Udall for his excellent work and his
leadership on this issue. I look forward to working with him and all of
my colleagues so that we extend the production tax credit and create a
more level playing field for sustainable energy.
With that, I yield the floor.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Senator from Indiana.
Cyber Security
Mr. COATS. Mr. President, 11 years ago this morning, September 11,
2001, nearly 3,000 of our citizens lost their lives in a senseless act
of terrorism that would change the course of America forever. That
fateful Tuesday morning changed the way we think about life in America.
It changed the way we travel. It changed the way we govern. It changed
all of our lives, with some, of course, sacrificing much more than
others.
From the first responders who ran into the crumbling buildings and
wreckage 11 years ago today to the Navy Seals who brought bin Laden to
justice, to the thousands of men and women in uniform who continue to
defend our freedom, countless Americans and their loved ones have
served and sacrificed in the fight against terrorism for now more than
a decade.
The tragic events of September 11 have also resulted in a more
vigilant Nation and a more prepared and proactive defense and security
operation for the American people. The attack highlighted several
vulnerabilities across State and Federal Government that had been
ignored for too long, and many of those have been addressed and
remedied.
In the aftermath of this tragedy, Congress put aside political
partisanship and worked together with the administration and its
departments to strengthen our national security and intelligence
efforts. Yet today we face another major potential attack on our
country different from those we faced before, but just as dangerous and
threatening.
It is not a hijacked plane or a bomb, although that remains a
significant threat, but it is rather a cyber attack, an attack using
the interconnected Internet that governs some of our most critical
infrastructure. This type of an attack comes across the wire or through
the air targeting a system and taking it down, which would have a
dramatic impact on our country.
As a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, I know that the
threat of a cyber attack is real and far reaching. A major attack on
our cyber systems could shut down our critical infrastructure, our
financial systems, our communications systems, our electric grids,
powerplants, water treatment centers, transportation systems,
refineries, and other interconnected critical infrastructure that
allows us to run our economy and protect the safety of Americans.
Every day American businesses are victims of cyber intrusions. The
threat and sophistication of these attacks is growing as we speak.
Earlier this year FBI Director Robert Mueller warned that, in the near
future, ``the cyber threat will pose the number one threat to our
country.''
The reason I came here today, in addition to acknowledging the
sacrifices of those that were made on September 11 and the sacrifices
that have been made by tens of thousands if not millions of Americans
since then and the kind of effort that has been put in place that will
hopefully prevent us from such an attack in the future, is to address a
failure on the part of this Congress and administration to respond to
this most imminent and threatening attack through our cyber network.
The week before the August recess, particularly in an election year,
will, of course, be filled with partisanship here in Washington. But we
hit a low point this year in adjourning for the August recess as we
rushed to vote to consider a cyber bill, which did not convey the
wishes of any of us who had worked for weeks and months to try to put
something together that could gain bipartisanship and consensus.
I voted to move forward with the bill, despite my concerns with the
legislation, so we could keep it alive over the August recess and
return here with this session reopening in September to address this
threat. With precious few weeks left before the election and the
precious few weeks left after the election and before the end of the
year, I
[[Page S6080]]
did not believe we could possibly leave here without putting the
protections in place that are necessary to provide adequate defenses
against a cyber attack on our critical infrastructure.
One-fifth of the Senate, both Republicans and Democrats, met every
day for weeks to iron out our differences on this cyber security
legislation. We recognized that our national security was at stake. And
despite some genuine disagreements, we all participated because we
thought we could find--and had to find--common ground; not just common
ground among the two political parties, but common ground between
industry and government as well.
Industry plays a critical role in this effort. With the active
participation of 20 Senators representing both parties and key
committees of jurisdiction, we came close. Unfortunately, politics
threw a wrench in our plans before a negotiated settlement was reached.
I remain hopeful, though, and I plan to keep working with my colleagues
to find the right balance between government and industry, standards
and incentives, free markets and national security.
I was frustrated to discover that after sitting on the sidelines
rather than working with Congress on this critical debate, the
President had signaled his desire to regulate cyber security by
executive fiat. No one can do this alone--not one party, not
government, or industry, and certainly not by executive order, which on
its best day cannot begin to provide the robust incentives and
information sharing required to achieve sufficient collaboration.
Congress must act to add cyber to its to-do list. I recognize that
Congress and this administration have a long list of remaining items to
address before the end of the year: the Defense authorization bill, the
looming so-called Taxmageddon, which includes the scheduled increase in
the current income tax rates, the alternative minimum tax patch, the
estate tax, the research and development tax credit, other tax
extenders, the fix for physician Medicare reimbursement, the impact of
the across-the-board cuts through sequestration, and another impending
debt ceiling. All of this is before us with just a little bit of time
left. But what needs to be near the top or at the top of this list is
cyber security legislation that provides flexibility, preserves
personal liberties, and protects our country from a widespread cyber
attack. Let's learn from the lessons of September 11 and not wait for a
major strike before we act.
Let's work together, Democrats and Republicans, Congress and the
White House, government and the private sector, to make our country a
safer, more prosperous place. I urge my colleagues to continue to work
in a bipartisan manner to bring forward a responsible and balanced
cyber security bill. The responsibility falls on all of us. We know
this threat is ongoing and real. We know we need to act. And rather
than acting alone, I call on the President to join with the Members of
this Chamber and work together to do the right thing, to cast aside
partisanship and put the security of our country above political
security.
There is a lot of focus and emphasis on the election that lies before
us. That is natural. But when we are facing a threat as imminent and as
potential and as real as this, we must do everything we can to
transcend the politics of the day, and to look at the policy that needs
to be put in place to make our country safer and protect our citizens.
I yield the floor, and I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Manchin.) The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Moment of Silence to Observe the Eleventh Anniversary of the Attacks on
September, 11, 2001
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the Senate will
observe a moment of silence in recognition of the 11th anniversary of
the attacks on September 11, 2001.
(Moment of silence.)
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Illinois.
Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, at this moment, the majority leader,
Senator Harry Reid, and the Republican leader, Senator Mitch McConnell,
are gathered on the east front steps of the U.S. Capitol along with
Members of the House of Representatives. It is a bipartisan gathering
to commemorate the 11th anniversary of the terrible tragedy of 9/11.
On that date the gathering was more spontaneous but reflected a
feeling of unity, which all of us felt in light of that national
tragedy. Toward the end of that gathering 11 years ago, Senator Barbara
Mikulski suggested that Members sing ``God Bless America,'' and they
did. Today, during the course of this ceremony, there will be a moment
of silence, prayer, as well as the singing of ``God Bless America'' to
celebrate the great effort that has been made by so many to keep
America safe and to mourn the loss of those who lost their lives on 9/
11.
We remember today all of those who were lost and all those who
suffered in the terrorist attacks on America. In their honor may we
work to keep alive that sense of unity we felt on that day, and may we
do our best to serve the loved ones they left and the Nation they
loved.
Mr. President, I yield the floor, and I suggest the absence of a
quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. HELLER. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. HELLER. I ask unanimous consent to speak as if in morning
business.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. HELLER. Mr. President, today we come together on the floor of the
Senate to remember and honor the victims of September 11, 2001.
Only 11 short years ago on this day, enemies of freedom and equality
attacked the United States and murdered thousands of innocent people.
From this attack, our Nation grew stronger. United by our flag and our
beliefs, America rose to defend the homeland and take the battle to our
enemies. And it has not been easy. No, it has been a long 11 years of
combat in Afghanistan and Iraq.
But our military and its leaders have brought the mastermind of the
9/11 attacks, Osama bin Laden, to justice. And for a decade, America
has been safe from the next round of attacks that we all thought were
imminent 11 years ago.
None of this could have been accomplished without the brave men and
women of our Armed Forces.
On 9/11, the mission of our military changed overnight. Those already
enlisted knew they would be heading for war, and many more joined our
military knowing that they too would be headed for combat.
From the events of 9/11, the best of America was reborn. A new
generation of Americans dedicated to service and preservation of
freedom was called to action because of 9/11. These Americans were
among the first on the ground in foreign countries. They toppled a
dictator, liberated a nation of women and children from an oppressive
regime, and brought to justice Osama bin Laden.
Today our overseas operations fighting the war on terror continue.
But for many of these soldiers, their tour of duty is over and they are
coming home. They are coming home to family and friends and those who
love them, but also to a stagnant economy and record high unemployment.
Today, unemployment amongst post-9/11 veterans is 9.8 percent;
192,000 post-9/11 veterans are unemployed, and 443,000 9/11 veterans
are not even participating in the labor force. The policy of this
Nation to grow the economy is failing these brave men and women who
have fought to protect our freedoms--including economic freedoms.
This week the Senate will take up a bill that will provide $1 billion
over 5 years to hire 20,000 veterans. I am proud to support this
measure and hope we will have the opportunity to debate it and other
job-creating measures before we return home at the end of this work
period.
Since coming to the Senate, job creation has been my No. 1 priority.
I will
[[Page S6081]]
support taking up and debating any measure relating to this issue,
especially those that affect veterans. That is why I was proud to reach
across bipartisan lines to work to pass the VOW to Hire Heroes Act, and
know there is more work to be done. However, it is stunning that we are
at this point.
After a $1 trillion stimulus, bailout after bailout, a new
government-run health care program that will raise taxes on all
Americans, it is time to look our veterans in the eyes and ask: Is this
working? Are this administration's policies working for thousands of
unemployed Nevada veterans who have come back from their service to
find their homes underwater and their jobs lost in this great
recession?
It is not working. The bill we are taking up this week is an
acknowledgement that the policies of the past 4 years have not worked.
As a result of the failed policies of this administration, Nevada
veterans cannot find a job.
Our veterans deserve better. They deserve a good-paying job. That is
why I will support this measure that we will hopefully take up this
afternoon. But I also know there is much more we can do to provide
veterans the opportunities they deserve. In addition to supporting
cloture on the motion to proceed to this bill, I will also be filing my
Veterans Small Business Protection Act as an amendment. I introduced
this legislation, along with Ranking Member Burr of the Veterans'
Affairs Committee, to ensure that widows and dependents of
servicemembers killed in action are not alone to run a small business
while grieving over the loss of a loved one.
Congress has provided numerous benefits to our Nation's veterans who
own a small business--sole-source contracting, low-interest loans, and
other resources, in order to help these small businesses grow and to
create jobs. My legislation closes a large gap in Federal law that does
little for those who owned businesses before their activation and were
killed in the line of duty. As a Member of Congress, we must honor our
Nation's fallen as well as ensure that the loved ones they leave behind
have the same economic opportunities as afforded to that veteran. It is
a small token that we can provide to those who gave the ultimate
sacrifice for liberty.
I hope we will have the opportunity to offer amendments this week as
we debate the veterans job corps legislation and encourage my
colleagues to support my veterans small business bill.
In closing, our Nation owes a debt of gratitude to our Nation's
veterans, and Congress must fulfill the promises and commitments that
have been made to all of them. This week the Senate will continue to
work toward providing veterans with a good-paying job, and I support
that goal. But if we are going to help small businesses create jobs for
veterans and all Americans, we must change the policies coming from
Washington, DC, because it is not working.
I yield the floor and note the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Tester). The clerk will call the roll.
The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. NELSON of Florida. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that
the order for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. NELSON of Florida. Mr. President, I want to go ahead on this
Veterans Jobs Corps bill. I had anticipated I would be speaking after
the chairman of the committee, Senator Murray, but I will take the
liberty of going ahead, and then with her comments coming as the
chairman of the committee, which normally it would be the reverse. And
I thank Senator Murray for her leadership in all of these veterans
issues, but particularly the issue of unemployment among veterans when
they come home from the war. Especially among veterans who are age 24
and less, the unemployment figure is even higher.
It is appropriate on this particular day, September 11--11 years ago
today--with the fact that those terrorists hijacked the four commercial
airlines, causing the crashes at the World Trade Center, at the
Pentagon, and in a field in Pennsylvania. What was happening also that
morning was that police officers and firefighters and emergency
personnel rushed to respond, and many lost their lives in attempts to
save others.
The events of that morning mobilized American forces like we had not
seen in years. One of the first mobilizations was our U.S. military.
They were called to serve bravely in remote corners of the globe.
Eleven years later, the mastermind of 9/11, Osama bin Laden, was
taken down, we now have an al-Qaida that is severely diminished, and we
are bringing our troops home from that part of the world.
But for the troops, when they come home, the fight is not over. There
is another fight when they get back home to America. It is a different
type of battle.
The unemployment rate among veterans returning from Iraq and
Afghanistan was just under 11 percent in August. It is higher for those
who are younger. This problem is likely to continue to grow as we draw
down in Afghanistan, as we have already drawn down in Iraq.
It is worth noting that there have been steps made in the right
direction. This past summer we passed legislation that will help
veterans get Federal occupational licenses when their military training
matches the civilian requirements. That was a bill I had the privilege
of sponsoring. It passed the Senate unanimously. It was passed by the
House overwhelmingly. It was sent down and it was signed into law. Last
year we passed the bill granting tax benefits to companies that hire
wounded warriors. But we have to do more.
So we filed this legislation that the chairman of the committee,
Senator Murray, will further explain. This legislation is to create a
Veterans Jobs Corps. It is modeled after the Civilian Conservation
Corps of the 1930s. The Veterans Jobs Corps would put veterans back to
work restoring and protecting America's public lands and waters. The
bill would also create opportunities for veterans to serve as police
and firefighters and first responders.
We have had some success on this with smaller scale projects, such as
the Veterans Fire Corps pilot program at the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, which trains veterans to fight forest fires. In fact, it
has been so successful that folks who run these programs say they can
hardly keep trainees in the program because they are picked up for
full-time employment so fast. So we are expanding this idea from this
pilot study that has been so successful. We are expanding it now in the
Veterans Jobs Corps.
Ten percent of the money in this bill will go to hiring veterans with
specialties, such as those with the specialty of military police going
into civilian law enforcement and those with the specialty of medics to
be firefighters and first responders.
Not only will this bill help protect our communities, but the
Veterans Jobs Corps will help address the Federal maintenance backlog.
The National Park Service has deferred maintenance totaling over $11
billion. This backlog has been caused by the gradual shifting of
funding to the operations budgets of the Park Service at the expense of
everything else.
For example, at the Civil War battlefield in Fredericksburg, VA, a
$42 million backlog in maintenance is preventing the upkeep of that
vital piece of American history.
I am happy to say that a number of organizations have stepped forward
to support this bill. The American Legion, the Military Officers
Association of America, the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America,
and the National Association of Police Organizations--all of them
support this legislation.
One of the greatest honors I have in this job as Senator is getting
out to meet and to greet current members of our military all over the
globe and to thank the veterans back here at home for their service to
our country.
When you meet some of these folks, both young and old, they have
already done the tough, tough job, and then they come home and they
have tough times as well. These folks are hard working, they are highly
trained, highly disciplined, extremely skilled. We need to give them as
many opportunities as possible to succeed when they get back home here
in America.
It is up to us to stand by our soldiers, sailors, airmen, marines,
and coast
[[Page S6082]]
guardsmen. I want to urge the Senate, when we vote today at 2:15, to
grant the motion for cloture so we can take up this bill and quickly
pass it so those who have fought bravely for our Nation can find
employment when they come home.
I yield the floor and suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mrs. MURRAY. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mrs. MURRAY. Mr. President, we just heard the Senator from Florida
talk about the very important piece of legislation that is in front of
us. I wish to thank him for being the lead on this and all the work he
has put in it and the passion he has had to make sure our veterans in
this Nation have what they need when they come home from these wars.
Last Friday we were again reminded of the difficult employment
picture our Nation's veterans continue to face. In the monthly
unemployment rate for August, we saw across the country there were
720,000 unemployed veterans. It is a number that includes over 225,000
post-9/11 veterans, many of them who have served multiple tours in Iraq
and Afghanistan and have sacrificed time and again for our safety.
This should not be the case. Our veterans have what it takes to not
only go out and find work but to excel in the workforce of the 21st
century. In fact, the characteristics that our veterans have and
exemplify read like the job qualifications you might find at any major
company or small business, and that is because they have leadership
ability, discipline, technical skills, team work, and the ability to
perform under pressure--no question.
They have those skills because as a country we have invested in
training them. We cannot and should not let that training or the
millions of dollars we have invested in these men and women go to
waste. In far too many instances, however, that is what is happening.
Too often on the day our servicemembers are discharged, we as a nation
pat them on the back, thank them for their service, but we do not give
them a helping hand in the job market. That has to end.
The Senate has taken bipartisan action in the past to begin to change
the way our veterans do transition from the battlefield to the job
market. We were able to pass the VOW to Hire Heroes Act, which I
coauthored. That was signed into law last year. Importantly, that law
transforms the way we provide transition training to our servicemembers
when they leave the military. It includes a provision that in my home
State and across the country is providing thousands of dollars in tax
credits to businesses to hire our vets.
In addition to that bill, we have also worked to build partnerships
with the private sector in order to tap into the tremendous amount of
good will that our companies have for our returning heroes. Sometimes
this is as simple as working with a company to show them the easy steps
that can help bring veterans on board, such as ensuring that they are
advertising their job openings with local veterans service
organizations and on their local military bases or having veterans in
their own H.R. department with whom veterans can identify when they
apply for work or having someone on staff who can help translate the
experience of veterans into the work that company does.
Time and again, big companies such as Amazon and Microsoft or a lot
of smaller businesses I have seen tell me these steps make an impact.
But beyond those steps, it is very clear more needs to be done,
particularly when the unemployment rate among young veterans who are
ages 18 to 24 continues to hover around 20 percent. Action has to be
taken because 20 percent is one in five of our veterans who cannot find
a job to support their family; one in five of them who does not have an
income to provide stability; one in five of them who does not have the
work to provide them with the self-esteem and pride that is so critical
to their transition home.
This a problem that manifests itself in homelessness, in broken
families, and far too often in our veterans taking their own lives. It
is a problem that neither the veterans themselves nor government alone
can solve. But it is also one that we have to do everything we can to
address.
Here in the Senate, that means a bipartisan, all-hands-on-deck
strategy. That is exactly what the Senator from Florida is putting
forward. Senator Nelson has put forward the veterans job corps bill.
What this bill does is, over the next 5 years, it will increase
training and hiring opportunities for all our veterans who are using
successful job training programs in the country.
It is going to help hire qualified veterans as police officers and
firefighters and first responders--by the way, at a time when 85
percent of law enforcement agencies had to reduce their budgets in the
last year. It is going to help train and hire veterans to help restore
and protect our national, State and tribal forests, our parks and our
public lands--at a time, by the way, when we face a $10 billion
maintenance backlog for our public lands. It is a backlog I have seen
at home personally in my home State of Washington.
Because training and hiring our veterans has never been seen and
never should be an effort that divides us along partisan lines, the
veterans job corps bill takes good ideas from both sides of the aisle.
In fact, our bill will provide veterans with access to the Internet and
computers to help conduct job searches at one-stop centers and other
locations. This is an idea championed by Senator Toomey. It is going to
help guarantee that our rural and disabled veterans have access to
veterans employment representatives. This is a bill that is championed
by Senator Tester, who is presiding over the Senate this morning. It is
a good idea. We put it in this bill.
It is going to increase transition assistance for eligible veterans
and their spouses. That is a bill that was introduced by Senator
Boozman of our committee.
It will require consideration of a veteran's training or experience
gained while they are serving on Active Duty when they seek
certifications and licenses. That is a bill that is cosponsored by
Democrats and Republicans alike. This bill says all good ideas are
welcome.
Our veterans need all the help they can get. It is fully paid for in
a bipartisan way. It has been endorsed most recently by the National
Association of Police Organizations. But there are also a lot of
veterans service organizations that stand behind this bill as well.
They do so because they know that helping veterans find employment is
absolutely critical to meeting many of the challenges they face when
they come home.
Our veterans do not ask for a lot. Oftentimes, they come home and do
not even acknowledge their own sacrifice. My own father never talked
about his time fighting in World War II. In fact, I never saw his
Purple Heart or knew he had a wallet with shrapnel in it or a diary
that detailed his time in combat until after he died and my family
gathered to sort out his belongings.
But our veterans should not have to ask. We should know to provide
for them. When my father's generation came home from the war, they came
home to opportunity. My father came home to a community that supported
him. He came home to college and a job. It was a job that gave him
pride and a job that helped him start his family, and one that, of
course, ultimately led me to starting my own. That is the legacy of
opportunity this Senate, in a bipartisan way, has lived up to for
today's veterans.
I urge our colleagues to build on the successes we have had in
passing bipartisan veterans employment legislation. Veterans returning
home from across the country are watching us. They certainly do not
have time to let politics block their path to a job that will help them
serve their community. Surely, this is a bill that is something we can
show them that we can come together on no matter how close or far away
we are from an election.
I yield the floor and I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mrs. MURRAY. I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum
call be rescinded.
[[Page S6083]]
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________