[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5963]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN ECUADOR
Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, several weeks ago I spoke in this Chamber
about the assault on freedom of expression in Ecuador, where President
Correa has sought to silence his critics including the Special
Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression at the Organization of American
States.
Last week, these attacks on legitimate expression reached a new
height when, according to press reports, Ecuador's Secretariat of
Pueblos, Mireya Cardenas, said the government is investigating
Fundamedios to determine if the support it receives from the U.S.
Agency for International Development--USAID--is being used to interfere
in ``internal political affairs''. She specifically criticized
Fundamedios for lodging complaints at the Inter-American Human Rights
Commission. She also attacked USAID for supporting sustainable
forestry, civil society organizations, and the development of local
productive enterprises, which are designed to protect the environment
and improve the livelihoods of the Ecuadoran people.
Mr. President, Fundamedios is a respected Ecuadoran nonpartisan
organization that seeks to defend freedom of the press at a time when
journalists and media organizations in that country are being vilified
and threatened by officials of the very government that should be
protecting them. It is similar to the conduct we have seen in Russia,
Egypt, Azerbaijan, Venezuela, and other countries whose governments
mistakenly equate legitimate advocacy by civil society organizations
with unlawful political activity, as if Ecuador's political affairs are
the sole province of those who the government approves of.
It is also important to reaffirm the indispensable role of the Inter-
American human rights system, which has recently been targeted not only
by President Correa, but also by the leaders of other Latin countries
with weak and corrupt judicial systems who, in the name of ``reform'',
seek to limit access to alternative fora for its citizens to obtain
justice for abuses by government security forces. It is interesting
that these same governments welcome the support of the OAS when it
suits them, but campaign to weaken its mandate when it does not.
To make a bad situation worse, President Correa again recently
attacked one of Ecuador's most respected newspapers. A few weeks ago,
he said on TV that an editor with El Universo was ``sinister.'' And on
July 28, he suggested that the editor of El Comercio was ``mentally
ill'' and ``unethical'', for what appear to be nothing more than public
comments made on the paper's website by readers who questioned
presidential decisions.
On July 31, members of the police and the labor ministry, reportedly
without a warrant, seized several items and information from the
offices of the magazine Vanguardia for allegedly violating labor laws.
The magazine's director, Juan Carlos Calderon, said the incident is an
attempt to silence the independent press in Ecuador.
For those of us who want closer relations between the United States
and other countries in the hemisphere, including Ecuador, and who
believe it is everyone's responsibility to stand up for universal human
rights of which freedom of expression is the most cherished, it is
disappointing to see the path the Correa government is taking.
This is not about competing political philosophies, party
affiliation, or national sovereignty. It is about protecting the right
of Ecuadoran journalists and Fundamedios to be free of government
interference, and of defending the constitutional rights of all of
Ecuador's citizens. The country's first constitution, written in 1830,
stipulated that ``every citizen can express their thoughts and publish
them freely through the press.'' Its current constitution, just 4 years
old, protects each citizen's right ``to voice one's opinion and express
one's thinking freely and in all of its forms and manifestations.''
The people of Ecuador have a right to receive uncensored information.
Sometimes that information is accurate, sometimes it is not. Everyone
in public office knows that. Personal attacks and inflammatory charges
by top officials weaken democratic discourse and have no place in a
country with a long commitment to civil liberties.
____________________