[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5927-S5930]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Cyber Security
Mr. BLUNT. I rise today on two topics. One, I want to say that while
I don't agree with everything my good friend from Rhode Island just
said about the issue he was talking about, the two of us have worked
all this year to try to bring people together on the issue we failed to
deal with today on cyber security.
Senator Whitehouse and I, along with Senators Kyl and Mikulski, at
the very first of the year began to create opportunities for Senators
to sit down together and talk about the threat we face and talk about
what we need to do to deal with it. I am convinced and I believe all
the people I just mentioned are equally convinced that two things will
happen: No. 1, we will eventually have a cyber attack on our country
that will be successful in some way that many Americans will understand
the danger we face from the cyber threat and, No. 2, that we will
eventually pass a bill. My strong belief is that will be a better bill
if we pass it before that event rather than after that event.
Mr. WHITEHOUSE. Madam President, may I simply interject, with the
Senator's permission, to say how much of a pleasure it has been to work
with him on this issue and to say that I think a great number of
Senators on both sides of the aisle have worked in very good faith to
get to a point where we can pass a bill. And I pledge to him, despite
the unfortunate outcome of today's cloture vote, that I am committed to
continuing to work with him, Senator Kyl, Senator Graham, Senator
McCain, and others--I guess Senator Chambliss--on the other side of the
aisle so we can indeed take the necessary steps to protect our Nation
from this threat. But I say this with a strong consciousness of the
very good will and the very hard work Senator Blunt put into this
effort and with great appreciation to him personally.
I yield the floor.
Mr. BLUNT. I thank my friend from Rhode Island, and I think we can
move forward. I think there is good faith.
As I said, we started--the four of us--beginning to get people
together. That group was quickly joined by Senators Collins and
Lieberman, so then six of us began to get people together. There were
any number of meetings this week with about two dozen Senators, about
equally divided between both parties, trying to find a way forward. I
didn't think we found that in the cloture motion today. The motion
said: Here is how we are going to proceed to finish the bill, and so we
didn't move forward today. But I hope we can continue to work with
Senator Reid and others to create the sense that Senator Whitehouse
just expressed, that there is great bipartisan effort being made to
find a solution that not only would pass a Senate bill but would wind
up with a bill on the President's desk sometime this year.
You don't have to look very far to find people who will say that the
greatest threat we face at this moment is the threat of some kind of
cyber attack. At the highest levels of our military structure, of our
intelligence structure, they quickly come to that conclusion. And
leaving here for the work period in August that Congress has had since
the beginning of Congresses without having this done on the Senate side
is disappointing to me.
On the other hand, there wouldn't have been a bill even if we had
passed a bill today because we have to work with the House to have a
bill that winds up with a piece of paper on the President's desk--a
relatively small stack of paper--that he can sign and that then becomes
the law that allows us to either minimize or hopefully avoid the
current certainty that someone will eventually begin to get to our
critical infrastructure in a way that makes it hard for the country to
get water, to get electricity, to communicate, or to address the
financial network. You know, 3 or 4 days anywhere in the country where
the electricity is out, suddenly you begin to see all of the things
that are dependent on just the electrical grid alone.
Hopefully we can do this. I know work is being done. I will be
involved in some of it later today. As I said, I am disappointed we
didn't get this done, but it has to be done. We can't leave here this
year with the House saying ``we passed a bill'' and the Senate saying
either ``we didn't pass a bill because one side didn't want to work
with the other'' or ``we passed a bill, but the House wouldn't agree to
it.'' This is not a problem that we just need to have a political
answer to; this is a problem we need to have a real answer to.
[[Page S5930]]