[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5686]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                          STOCK ACT AMENDMENTS

  Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous 
consent to take from the Speaker's table the bill (S. 3510) to prevent 
harm to the national security or endangering the military officers and 
civilian employees to whom internet publication of certain information 
applies, and for other purposes, and ask for its immediate 
consideration in the House.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Johnson of Ohio). Is there objection to 
the request of the gentleman from California?
  There was no objection.
  The text of the bill is as follows:

                                S. 3510

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. EFFECTIVE DATE DELAY.

       The STOCK Act (Public Law 112-105) is amended--
       (1) in section 8(a)(1), by striking ``August 31, 2012'' and 
     inserting ``September 30, 2012''; and
       (2) in section 11(a)(1), by striking ``August 31, 2012'' 
     and inserting ``September 30, 2012''.

     SEC. 2. IMPLEMENTATION OF PTR REQUIREMENTS UNDER STOCK ACT.

       Effective September 30, 2012, for purposes of implementing 
     subsection (l) of section 103 of the Ethics in Government Act 
     of 1978 (as added by section 6 of the STOCK Act, Public Law 
     112-105) for reporting individuals whose reports under 
     section 101 of such Act (5 U.S.C. App. 101) are required to 
     be filed with the Clerk of the House of Representatives, 
     section 102(e) of such Act (5 U.S.C. App. 102(e)) shall apply 
     as if the report under such subsection (l) were a report 
     under such section 101 but only with respect to the 
     transaction information required under such subsection (l).

  The bill was ordered to be read a third time, was read the third 
time, and passed, and a motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

                          ____________________