[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 115 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5724-S5725]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
VETERANS JOBS CORPS ACT OF 2012--MOTION TO PROCEED
Mr. REID. Mr. President, I now move to proceed to Calendar No. 473,
S. 3429
[[Page S5725]]
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the motion.
The bill clerk read as follows:
Motion to proceed to Calendar No. 473, S. 3429, a bill to
require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a
veterans jobs corps, and for other purposes.
Mr. REID. I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. LIEBERMAN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Cyber Security Legislation
Mr. LIEBERMAN. Mr. President, I rise to respond to the statement of
the majority leader--first, to say that I share his sadness and
disappointment that he had to file a cloture motion on this
Cybersecurity Act, but I totally agree with the decision he has made. I
do not think he had any choice.
I think we are facing on the one hand an urgent, real, and growing
threat to our security and our prosperity because we are vulnerable;
that is, the privately owned cyber infrastructure of our country is
vulnerable to attack from foreign enemies, from nonstate actors such as
terrorist groups, from organized criminal gangs who are just out to
steal billions of dollars over the Internet, and from hackers.
So we are dealing with a real problem that all the nonpolitical
security experts from the last administration, the Bush administration,
and this one, the Obama administration, say is rising rapidly to being
the No. 1 threat to American security. Over the Internet now, because
of our vulnerability over cyber space, a foreign enemy can do us more
damage than the terrorists did to us on 9/11. It is that stark. So that
is one reality.
The other reality is that Senator Collins and I, Senator Rockefeller
and Senator Feinstein, have been working literally for years. As
Senator Reid said, because of the urgency of the problem, we decided we
cannot just fight for 100 percent of what we thought was best to
protect our security. We pulled back; we made it not mandatory. We have
standards being set for the private sector to defend itself and us
better, and we are creating carrots and not sticks to encourage them to
opt into those cyber security standards. That is one reality.
The other reality is that in our government--notwithstanding
controversy here--all the Departments are working like a team. As
General Alexander, the head of Cyber Command at the Department of
Defense says, cyber security is a team sport--the Department of
Homeland Security, the Department of Defense, the FBI, the intelligence
community all working together to protect our country. But they do not
have the tools they need, and they urgently need this bill.
Yet the other reality is, in the Senate, where once again we are
gridlocked, we cannot even get the consent necessary to take up
amendments to vote on. Senator Collins and I have said all along: Just
get this bill to the floor. Let the Chamber, the 100 Senators, work
their will on germane and relevant amendments, and something good will
result for the country. So here is the bill on the Senate floor, and
yet Members are blocking us from taking up those amendments. And I am
afraid the consequence is that they are running out the clock.
A lot of good work done by those of us who have sponsored the pending
legislation, in a very constructive, bipartisan group, led by Senator
Kyl and Senator Whitehouse--including three additional members of the
Democratic Caucus and Republican Caucus--have worked very hard to
bridge the gaps. We have come closer together, but we are not going to
work this out unless we can vote.
I wish we had not come to this point, but Senator Reid has made the
correct and necessary decision, and it will confront the Members of the
Senate on Thursday with a decision: Are you going to vote for cloture
to at least allow the Chamber to consider all the amendments on this
bill that are germane and relevant or are you going to say: No, I will
only settle for exactly what I want, and I do not want this bill;
therefore, I am going to vote against cloture and run the risk--which
all the independent cyber security experts in our Nation tell us we
will run if we do not do anything--that we will suffer a major attack
or at least we will continue to suffer major cyber theft.
So I am saddened. We have worked very hard on this. But that is not
the point. The point is, there is an urgent necessity to pass this
legislation. It ought to be nonpartisan. It ought not to be the victim
of special interest pleading. It ought to be all of us coming together,
as we usually have on national security matters, to put the national
security interests of the American people ahead of special interests,
to resolve our differences, to settle for less than 100 percent, and to
get something done to protect our country or is this going to be
another case where the Senate fails to bridge the gaps, fails to be
willing to make principled compromises and therefore fails not only to
fix a problem but, in this case, to protect our country from a very
clear and present danger of cyber attack and cyber theft?
So Thursday will be the day of decision. I hope perhaps meetings can
occur tomorrow in which we can reconcile our differences and agree on a
method to go forward. If not, every Member of the Senate is going to
have to decide whether they want to block action on cyber security
legislation or whether they want to go forward and consider the
amendments on both sides that have been filed.
I thank the Presiding Officer and yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. LIEBERMAN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Udall of Colorado.) Without objection, it
is so ordered.
Mr. LIEBERMAN. Mr. President, it strikes me, as I call you, Mr.
President, that I once had the high honor to support a man who shared
your name, indeed your father, for President of the United States. So
it is nice to be able to call you Mr. President.
____________________