[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 104 (Thursday, July 12, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4944-S4945]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
HUNGARY
Mr. CARDIN. Mr. President, a year ago, I shared with my colleagues
concerns I had about the trajectory of democracy in Hungary.
Unfortunately, since then Hungary has moved ever farther away from a
broad range of norms relating to democracy and the rule of law.
On June 6, David Kramer, the President of Freedom House who served as
Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights and Labor for
President George W. Bush, summed up the situation. Releasing Freedom
House's latest edition of Nations in Transit Kramer said: ``Hungarian
Prime Minister Viktor Orban and Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych,
under the pretext of so-called reforms, have been systematically
breaking down critical checks and balances. They appear to be pursuing
the `Putinization' of their countries.''
The report further elaborates, ``Hungary's precipitous descent is the
most glaring example among the newer European Union (EU) members. Its
deterioration over the past five years has affected institutions that
form the bedrock of democratically accountable systems, including
independent courts and media. Hungary's negative trajectory predated
the current government of Prime Minister Viktor Orban, but his drive to
concentrate power over the past two years has forcefully propelled the
trend.''
Perhaps the most authoritative voice regarding this phenomenon is the
Prime Minister himself. In a February 2010 speech, Viktor Orban
criticized a system of governance based on pluralism and called instead
for: ``a large centralized political field of power . . . designed for
permanently governing.'' In June of last year, he defended his plan to
cement economic policy in so-called cardinal laws, which require a two-
thirds vote in parliament to change, by saying, ``It is no secret that
in this respect I am tying the hands of the next government, and not
only the next one but the following ten.''
Checks and balances have been eroded and power has been concentrated
in the hands of officials whose extended terms of office will allow
them to long outlive this government and the next. These include the
public prosecutor, head of the state audit office, head of the national
judicial office, and head of the media board. Those who have expressed
concerns about these developments have good reason to be alarmed.
I am particularly concerned about the independence of the judiciary
which, it was reported this week, will be the subject of infringement
proceedings launched by the European Commission, and Hungary's new
media law. Although there have been some cosmetic tweaks to the media
law, the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media has argued that it
remains highly problematic. Indeed, one expert has predicted that the
most likely outcome of the new law will be to squeeze out reporting on
corruption.
Hungary also adopted a new law on religion last year that had the
stunning effect of stripping hundreds of religions of their legal
recognition en masse. Of the 366 faiths which previously had legal
status in Hungary, only 14 were initially granted recognition under the
new law. Remarkably, the power to decide what is or is not a religion
is vested entirely and exclusively in the hands of the legislature,
making it a singularly politicized and arbitrary process. Of 84
churches that subsequently attempted to regain legal recognition, 66
were rejected without any explanation or legal rationale at all. The
notion that the new framework should be acceptable because the faiths
of most Hungarian citizens are recognized is poor comfort for the
minority who find themselves the victims of this discriminatory
process. This law also stands as a negative example for many countries
around the world just now beginning tenuous movement towards democracy
and human rights.
Finally, a year ago, I warned that ``[i]f one side of the nationalism
coin is an excessive fixation on Hungarian ethnic identity beyond the
borders, the other side is intolerance toward minorities at home.'' I
am especially concerned by an escalation of anti-Semitic acts which I
believe have grown directly from the government's own role in seeking
to revise Hungary's past.
Propaganda against the 1920 Treaty of Trianon, which defines the
current borders of Hungary, has manifested itself in several ways. Most
concretely, the Hungarian government extended citizenship on the basis
of ethnic or blood identity--something the government of Viktor Orban
promised the Council of Europe in 2001 that it would not do and which
failed to win popular support in a 2004 referendum. Second, the
government extended voting rights to these new ethnic citizens in
countries including Romania, Serbia, Slovakia and Ukraine. This has
combined with a rhetorical and symbolic fixation on ``lost'' Hungarian
territories--apparently the rationale for displaying an 1848 map of
Greater Hungary during Hungary's EU presidency last year. In this way,
the government is effectively advancing central elements of the agenda
of the extremist, anti-Semitic, anti-Roma Jobbik party. Moreover,
implicitly--but unmistakably--it is sending the message that Hungary is
no longer a civic state where political rights such as voting derive
from citizenship, but where citizenship derives from one's ethnic
status or blood identity.
The most recent manifestation of this revisionism includes efforts to
rehabilitate convicted war criminal Albert Wass and the bizarre
spectacle of the Hungarian government's role in a ceremony in
neighboring Romania--over the objections of that country--honoring
fascist writer and ideologue Joszef Nyiro. That event effectively saw
the Speaker of the Hungarian Parliament, Laszlo Kover; the Hungarian
State Secretary for Culture, Geza Szocs; and Gabor Vona, the leader of
Hungary's most notoriously extremist party, Jobbik, united in honoring
Nyrio. Several municipalities have now seen fit to erect statues
honoring Miklos Horthy, Hungary's wartime leader, and the writings of
Wass and Nyiro have been elevated onto the national curriculum.
It is not surprising that this climate of intolerance and revisionism
has gone hand-in-hand with an outbreak of intolerance, such as the
antiSemitic verbal assaults on a 90-year old Rabbi and on a journalist,
an attack on a synagogue menorah in Nagykanizsa, the vandalism of a
Jewish memorial in Budapest and monuments honoring Raoul Wallenberg,
the Blood Libel screed by a Jobbik MP just before Passover, and the
recent revelation that a Jobbik MP requested--and received--a
certificate from a genetic diagnostic company attesting that the MP did
not have Jewish or Romani ancestry.
[[Page S4945]]
We are frequently told that Fidesz is the party best positioned in
Hungary to guard against the extremism of Jobbik. At the moment, there
seems to be little evidence to support that claim. The campaign to
rehabilitate fascist ideologues and leaders from World War II is
dangerous and must stop. Ultimately, democracy and the rights of
minorities will stand or fall together.
Hungary is not just on the wrong track, it is heading down a
dangerous road. The rehabilitation of disgraced World War II figures
and the exaltation of blood and nation reek of a different era, which
the community of democracies--especially Europe--had hoped was gone for
good. Today's Hungary demonstrates that the battle against the worst
human instincts is never fully won but must be fought in every
generation.
____________________