[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 96 (Monday, June 25, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4461-S4463]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
By Mrs. MURRAY:
S. 3340. A bill to improve and enhance the programs and activities of
the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs
regarding suicide prevention and resilience and behavioral health
disorders for members of the Armed Forces and veterans, and for other
purposes; to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Mrs. MURRAY. Madam President, last February, in my office in Seattle,
I sat down with an Iraq and Afghanistan war veteran named Stephen Davis
and his wife Kim. Stephen and Kim were there to talk to me about their
experiences since he returned home and about the invisible wounds of
war they were struggling with together every single day.
At the meeting Kim did most of the talking. She told me about the
nightmares. She told me about the lack of sleep. She talked about the
confusion and the anxiety that was now a constant in their lives. But
it was the way she summed up her experience since Stephen returned home
that struck me hardest.
She said her husband still hadn't returned home. She said the husband
she had been married to for nearly two decades--although he was sitting
directly next to her--was still not back from the war.
Do you know what. Despite the fact that we often refer to these
wounds as invisible, you could see it. When it came time for Stephen to
describe to me his experiences, he shook as he explained how difficult
the transition
[[Page S4462]]
home has been for him, his wife, and for their family.
The Davis family's story is no different than what thousands of other
families have faced. But their story does have a tragic and frustrating
twist. You see, Sergeant Davis knew when he returned home that he had a
problem with post-traumatic stress, and he was courageous enough to
reach out for help. He sought care and he was diagnosed with PTSD.
But just a few months later, after a visit to Madigan Army Medical
Base in my State of Washington, he was told something that shocked and
appalled him and his wife. After just a 10-minute meeting and a written
questionnaire, Sergeant Davis was told he was exaggerating his symptoms
and he didn't have PTSD. He was told, in effect, that despite serving
in two war zones, despite being involved in three separate IED
incidents, and despite his repeated deployments, he was making it all
up.
He was then sent home with a diagnosis of adjustment disorder and
told his disability rating would be lowered and that the benefits he
and his family would receive would ultimately be diminished. If this
sounds like an isolated, shocking incident, here is something you will
find even more shocking. Sergeant Davis was one of literally hundreds
of patients at that Army hospital who were told the exact same thing.
Soldiers who had been diagnosed with PTSD--not just once but several
times--had their diagnosis taken away. In many instances these soldiers
were told they were embellishing or even outright lying about their
symptoms. In fact, so many soldiers were being accused of making up
symptoms by doctors at that hospital I began to get letters and phone
calls from them to my office.
Soon after that, documents came to light showing that the doctors
diagnosing these soldiers were being encouraged to consider not just
the best diagnosis for their patients but also the cost of care. These
revelations have led to a series of internal investigations that are
still underway today. Even more important, they have led to these
soldiers now, thankfully, being reevaluated, and today hundreds of
these soldiers, including Sergeant Davis, have had their proper PTSD
diagnosis restored.
This, too, could be viewed as an isolated incident. In fact, when I
first raised concerns, the problems we saw at Madigan could be
happening at other bases across the country, that is exactly what I was
told--it was an isolated incident at one base, at one hospital. But I
knew better.
I remembered back to this Salon article that ran a few years ago. In
that article, a doctor from Fort Carson in Colorado talked about how he
was ``under a lot of pressure to not diagnose PTSD.''
It went on to quote a former Army psychologist named David Rudd, who
said:
Each diagnosis is an acknowledgement that psychiatric
casualties are a huge price tag of this war. It is easiest to
dismiss these casualties because you can't see the wounds. If
they change the diagnosis, they can dismiss you at a
substantially decreased rate.
Madam President, I also had my own staff launch an investigation into
how the military and the VA were diagnosing mental health conditions at
other bases across our country, and I was very troubled by what I
found.
It became clear that there were other cases where doctors accused
soldiers of exaggerating symptoms without any documentation of
appropriate interview techniques. They encountered inadequate VA
medical examinations, especially in relation to traumatic brain injury.
They found that many VA rating decisions contained errors, which in
some cases complicated the level of benefits that veterans should have
received.
Now, to their credit, the Army did not run and hide as the questions
about other bases continued to mount. In fact, they have now taken two
important steps. First, in April, they issued a new policy for
diagnosing PTSD that criticized the methods being used at Madigan and
pointed out to health officials throughout the entire system that it
was unlikely that soldiers were faking these symptoms. Then, in May,
the Army went further and announced they would review all mental health
diagnoses across the country dating back to 2001. That, in turn, has
led Secretary Panetta to announce just last week that all branches of
the military are now going to undergo a similar review.
Without question, these are historic steps in our efforts to right a
decade of inconsistencies in how the invisible wounds of war have been
evaluated. Servicemembers, veterans, and their families should never
have to wade through an unending bureaucratic process. Because of this
outcry from veterans and servicemembers alike, the Pentagon now has an
extraordinary opportunity to go back and correct the mistakes of the
past.
We have to make sure these mistakes are never repeated. We still need
to fundamentally change a system that Secretary Panetta admitted to me
last week has ``huge gaps'' in it.
That is why I am here this evening. Today, I am introducing the
Mental Health ACCESS Act of 2012. It is a bill that seeks to make
improvements to make sure that those who have served have access to
consistent, quality behavioral health care.
It is a bill that strengthens oversight of military mental health
care and improves the integrated disability evaluation system on which
we rely. As anyone who understands these issues knows well, this is not
an easy task. The mental health care, suicide prevention, and
counseling programs we provide our servicemembers are spread throughout
this entire Department of Defense and the VA. Too often they are
entangled in a web of bureaucracy and, frankly, too often this makes
them difficult to address in legislation.
In crafting this bill I identified critical changes that need to be
made at both the Department of Defense and the VA, and I set up a
checklist of legislative changes needed to do just that. Some
provisions in the bill will likely be addressed in my Veterans
Committee. Others will need to be addressed through Defense bills and
work with the chairs of those committees. But all of these provisions
are critical, and today I want to share with you some of the most
important ones.
High atop the list of changes this bill makes is addressing military
suicides which, as we all know, is an epidemic that now outpaces combat
deaths in this country. My bill will require the Pentagon to create
comprehensive standardized suicide prevention programs. It would also
require the Department to better oversee mental health services for
servicemembers.
It will expand eligibility for a variety of VA mental health services
to family members so we can help families and spouses to cope with the
stress of deployment and strengthen the support network that is
critical to servicemembers who are returning from deployment.
Third, my bill will improve training and education for our health
care providers. Oftentimes our servicemembers seek out help from
chaplains, medics, or others who may be unprepared to offer counseling.
This bill will help prepare them through continuing education programs.
Fourth, my bill will create more peer-to-peer counseling
opportunities. It would do it by requiring VA to offer peer support
services at all medical centers and by supporting opportunities to
train vets to provide peer services.
Finally, this bill will require VA to establish accurate and reliable
measures for mental health services. This will help ensure that the VA
understands the problems they face so that veterans can get into the
care we know they can provide.
All of these are critical steps at a pivotal time, because the truth
is, right now the Department of Defense and the VA are losing the
battle against the mental and behavioral wounds of these wars.
To see that, you don't need to look any farther than the tragic fact
that already this year over 150 active-duty servicemembers have taken
their own lives or the fact that one veteran commits suicide in this
country every 80 minutes. And while we all know there are a number of
factors that contribute to suicide--repeated deployments, lack of
employment security, isolation in their communities, and difficulty
transitioning back to their families--not having access to quality and
timely mental health care is vital.
[[Page S4463]]
When our veterans cannot get the care they need, they often self-
medicate. When they wait endlessly for a proper diagnosis, they lose
hope. Last year at this time, I held a hearing in my veterans committee
on the mental health disability system this bill seeks to strengthen,
and I heard two stories that illustrate that despair.
Andrea Sawyer, the wife of Army SGT Lloyd Sawyer, testified about her
husband, who is an Iraq veteran and spent years searching for care.
Together, they hit barriers and they hit redtape so often that at one
point, she said, he held a knife to his throat in front of both her and
an Army psychiatrist before being talked out of it.
Later, in that very same hearing, Daniel Williams, an Iraq combat
veteran, testified about how his struggle to find care led him to stick
the gun in his mouth while his wife begged him to stop, only to see his
gun misfire.
Those are the stories that define this problem. These are men and
women we must be there for. They have served and sacrificed and done
everything this country has asked of them. They have left their
families, left their homes. They have served multiple times and
protected our Nation's interests at home and abroad. This bill will
make a difference for them, but we have to make these changes now.
Today I am asking Members of the Senate from both sides of the aisle
to please join me in this effort. We owe our veterans a medical
evaluation system that treats them fairly, that gives them the proper
diagnosis, and that provides access to the mental health care they have
earned and they deserve. We need to join together to get this
legislation passed, and I ask every Member of the Senate to help me get
this through. It is critical, as thousands of men and women come home
today and thousands of them are waiting on care.
Madam President, I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Ohio.
Mr. BROWN of Ohio. Madam President, let me begin by thanking the
chair of the Senate veterans committee for her incredible leadership on
one of the most tragic issues of our times--the suicide rate among
active-duty personnel in our Armed Forces, and especially among
veterans.
Last week I spoke to the Disabled American Veterans in Columbus. I
hear these same issues all the time, particularly among men and women
who are sent for their second, third, fourth, and fifth deployments.
One veteran, active in the DAV, told me about an Ohio soldier who has
had a seventh deployment. That is not what we should be doing, and so I
appreciate Senator Murray's leadership.
I am a member of that committee--the first Ohioan to ever serve on
the veterans committee for a full term--and I am on this committee
because of these problems. So I am thankful for the leadership we have
on that committee and for what Senator Murray has done.
I remember when I was presiding some years ago, and she was talking
on the Senate Floor about her dad, who is a veteran, and I know that is
a big part of why she does what she does.
I thank the Senator from Washington State.
____________________