[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 63 (Monday, May 7, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2914-S2915]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN ECUADOR
Mr. LEAHY. Madam President, May 3 was World Press Freedom Day. In
this country, we recognize freedom of expression as our most cherished
right. It forms the foundation for every other freedom, and an
independent press is essential to its exercise. Yet in many countries
expression is often censored and punished. Journalists are threatened,
imprisoned, and killed for exposing official corruption and criticizing
government repression. Not only is the media targeted and silenced, the
entire population is denied access to accurate reporting.
The Senate was in recess on May 3, but I would like to call other
Senators'
[[Page S2915]]
attention to troubling events that currently pose one of the gravest
threats to freedom of expression in this hemisphere. I am speaking
about the actions of Ecuador's President Rafael Correa and officials in
his government to silence independent broadcasters and publishers and
watchdog organizations, undermining the fundamental right of free
expression in ways that resemble what we have come to expect in Cuba,
Nicaragua, and Venezuela.
There is no institution more fundamental to democracy than a free and
independent press. A free press helps protect the rule of law, to
ensure that no person or group is above the rules and procedures that
govern a democratic society. A free press helps ensure transparency to
prod governments to be honest and accountable to their citizens.
Unfortunately, recent events in Ecuador suggest a deliberate shift
away from these democratic traditions, and this could pose grave
consequences for democracy in Ecuador.
Although wavering at times, Ecuador has a history of democratic
government of which its citizens can be proud. Ecuador's first
Constitution, written in 1830, stipulated that ``every citizen can
express their thoughts and publish them freely through the press.''
Ecuador's 1998 Constitution guarantees the right of journalists and
social communicators to ``seek, receive, learn, and disseminate''
events of general interest, with the goal of ``preserving the values of
the community.'' Even Ecuador's latest constitution, ratified just four
years ago, protects each citizen's right ``to voice one's opinion and
express one's thinking freely and in all of its forms and
manifestations.'' However, it appears that these protections--a vital
part of Ecuador's history of democratically elected, representative
government--now only apply at the discretion of President Correa.
During President Correa's term in office, the number of state-owned
media organizations has exploded--growing from just one government-run
news outlet to a media conglomerate that today is made up of more than
a dozen outlets. He has pursued criminal charges against columnists and
newspaper owners, including legal actions aimed at El Universo, one of
Ecuador's most respected newspapers. In the El Universo case, President
Correa won a $42 million award, and several journalists were sentenced
to 3 years in prison following a hearing before a temporary--and
recently appointed--magistrate. Although President Correa later
pardoned the journalists, an Ecuadoran court rejected his pardon, and
their fates remain unresolved. The fear of being charged and dragged
through the expensive legal system also silences many other journalists
or compels them to temper criticism of the government.
President Correa and his government are not only targeting
journalists. Some 200 activists, many of them indigenous people
protesting environmentally destructive mining projects, have been
criminally charged and detained. The pattern of arresting or
threatening to arrest social activists has suppressed the free flow of
information in Ecuador, silencing dissenting voices either by legal
action or self-censorship.
Perhaps most insidious to the principles of democracy, President
Correa's government has ushered in new reforms that could make illegal
almost all reporting about electoral campaigns. All censorship is
bruising to a democracy, but electoral censorship is a fatal blow. With
Presidential elections occurring in Ecuador in the next year, there is
growing concern that President Correa's actions represent an attempt to
influence the democratic process to his own political and personal
benefit.
Dr. Catalina Botero, the special rapporteur for freedom of expression
at the Organization of American States, OAS, has rightly criticized
President Correa's crusade against the press. In response, President
Correa has expanded his campaign of censorship beyond Ecuador's borders
and targeted Dr. Botero's office, proposing to the OAS earlier this
year a plan that would have restricted the ability of Dr. Botero's
office to issue independent reports and cutting off some of its
funding. Although the plan was rejected by the member states of the
OAS, President Correa's intent remains clear. No longer content to
silence his political opponents in Ecuador, he is now targeting his
critics elsewhere.
President Correa has tried to cloak his actions in populist
vocabulary, declaring that his censorship is motivated by a desire to
free the public from the corrupt interests of the business
organizations that often ran newspapers before the establishment of a
law forbidding anyone with a significant stake in a media company from
owning other businesses. Challenging viewpoints expressed in the media
of course is legitimate, common, and healthy in any society, but
preventing those views from being heard is not.
Mr. President, we should denounce attacks on the press in Ecuador and
elsewhere in this hemisphere. We should strongly support Dr. Botero and
her office. Protecting freedom of expression, a fundamental right
enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the American
Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man is everyone's concern and
responsibility. In doing so, we stand with the people of Ecuador and
their right to be heard and for the future of their democracy.
____________________