[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 56 (Wednesday, April 18, 2012)]
[House]
[Pages H1924-H1925]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
HEALTH CARE DISCRIMINATION
(Ms. SPEIER asked and was given permission to address the House for 1
minute and to revise and extend her remarks.)
Ms. SPEIER. Mr. Speaker, I'm sick of women getting the short end of
the stick. On the whole, women earn less than men for the exact same
jobs. In fact, compared to men, women basically work for free 3.5
months of the year since we only make 77 cents for every dollar earned
by a man.
But here's something that's not free--health care for women. We pay
$1 billion more a year in health insurance premiums than men. That's
astounding. And it's not because ``the fairer sex'' is less healthy
than men. In the individual market, a woman, 40 years old, nonsmoking,
in Kentucky, actually pays more for her health insurance than a 40-
year-old man who does smoke. Even among 30-year-olds in Chicago, women
are paying over 30 percent more for health insurance than men of the
same age. In South Dakota, a 40-year-old woman pays $1,200 more than a
40-year-old man for the exact same coverage.
The fact is, women are at the mercy of the vast majority of insurance
companies which charge us significantly more than men, even with
maternity coverage excluded.
Gender Rating in the individual market is wrong and must end.
And if you want maternity coverage? Forget it.
How's this for family values?
For women who do want maternity coverage in the individual market
it's an uphill battle to find it and an even greater challenge to pay
for it.
Maternity coverage is only covered by 6 percent of insurance
companies unless it is mandated by the state. And the cost can be
astronomical. Deductibles could be as high as $10,000.
Some companies offer special maternity coverage riders. In Kansas a
rider could cost over $1600 a month--well over the cost of a normal
health insurance premium.
And some of the riders require long waiting periods before the
coverage goes into effect.
Insurance companies call being a woman a pre-existing condition.
And they get away with charging women more for the same coverage as
men unless there are laws in place to prevent Gender Rating.
[[Page H1925]]
Thirteen states, including California, ban gender discrimination in
insurance coverage. Fortunately, in 2014 when the Affordable Care Act
goes into effect, the same will be true for the whole country.
This is a long overdue step for women's equality and a key moment for
health care.
____________________