[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 52 (Thursday, March 29, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S2233]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
BETTER HEALTH REWARDS PROGRAM ACT OF 2012
Mr. WYDEN. Mr. President, I wish to advocate for legislation my
colleague, Senator Portman, and I have coauthored that focuses on
driving better health outcomes for America's seniors through the use of
real, positive financial incentives.
I think we can all agree on a theory--the best health care is often
the least expensive, and it is often health care you can have real
control over--prevention.
According to the Hastings Center, 76 percent of Medicare spending is
on patients with five or more chronic diseases: stroke, heart disease,
diabetes and cancer lead the way. And with $2.7 trillion spent annually
on health care, one of the best ways to slow the growth of that
spending is to keep Americans healthier, and to do that, we have to
reduce the prevalence of chronic disease.
I think Medicare can help spark that transformation. It is a large
Federal program, some of the smartest health policy links the Federal
Government and the private sector, and, most important, the Federal
Government already pays for seniors to have an annual physical.
At present, when seniors leave that physical, too often there is no
game plan or specific steps a senior can take to get healthier in the
year ahead. Seniors get a bunch of numbers about their tests, possibly
a prescription, and some medical lingo about their general health, but
mostly everyone just hopes things will turn out OK at the next
physical. Maybe it was an OK year, and that extra dessert wasn't a
problem after all.
We believe that if the Federal Government is already paying for that
physical, it is only common sense to wring every possible advantage for
seniors out of it, specifically by giving seniors the tools to make
changes that promote good health and reward them for staying motivated.
That is exactly what the bill I have written with Senator Portman
does. Typically, the assumption has always been that preventive care
means more services. But in this case, government already pays for the
service--the $3.8 billion on the annual wellness visit--and we are
saying, let's get more out of that visit.
Here is how our legislation--the Medicare Better Health Rewards
Program Act--would do that:
First, it is voluntary. Since we hear a little discussion about
mandates these days, this is voluntary.
In year 1, a senior has their physical, has their tests run, and
their health provider has a conversation with them about their health.
They come up with a plan to use the next year so that the senior can
get healthier. The provider then lets Medicare know their patient is
participating.
In year 2, the senior comes back for their next annual wellness
visit. Again, tests are run, and they discuss the changes that may have
occurred over the last year. If they have gotten healthier and their
provider confirms it, they are eligible for a Healthy Reward. If they
haven't, they still had their physical at no out of pocket cost to
them. Their provider still gets paid. The same happens again in year 3.
Finally, the money to pay these rewards comes from the fact that as
participating seniors get healthier, Medicare is spending less money on
them. They are saving the system money. If that occurs, those seniors
who are getting healthier will be able to share in the savings.
Bottom line: Innovation is rampant in American health care, and we
are here with a new strategy to bring a fresh wave of innovation to
Medicare.
I would like to thank Senator Portman for working with me on this new
approach to Medicare reform, and I urge my colleagues to join us in
cosponsoring our legislation.
____________________