[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 50 (Tuesday, March 27, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2040-S2041]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
RACIAL PROFILING
Mr. CARDIN. Mr. President, I rise today to discuss the tragic death
of Trayvon Martin and the larger issue of racial profiling. On Monday I
spoke about this issue at the Center for Urban Families in Baltimore.
Joining me were representatives from various faith and civil rights
groups in Baltimore, as well as graduates from the center's program.
This weekend we saw numerous rallies take place across the United
States, including rallies called Million Hoodie Marches where
individuals wore hoodies in solidarity with Trayvon Martin.
I was touched by what President Obama said on Friday about this case.
He said:
If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon. And I think every
parent in America should be able to understand why it is
absolutely imperative that we investigate every aspect of
this. I think all of us have to do some soul searching to
figure out how something like this happened.
That is why I am so pleased that the Justice Department, under the
supervision of Attorney General Eric Holder, has announced an
investigation into the avoidable shooting death of Trayvon Martin on
February 26, 2012. As we all know from the news, an unarmed Martin, 17,
was shot in Sanford, FL, on his way home from a convenience store by a
neighborhood watch volunteer.
I am pleased that the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department
will join the Federal Bureau of Investigation in investigating the
tragic, avoidable shooting death of Trayvon Martin. In particular, I
also support the Justice Department's decision to send the Community
Relations Service to Sanford to help defuse tensions while the
investigation is being conducted.
I join all Americans in wanting a full and complete investigation
into the shooting death of Trayvon Martin to ensure that justice is
served. There are many questions we need the Justice Department to
answer. One is whether Trayvon was the victim of a hate crime by
Zimmerman. One is whether
[[Page S2041]]
Trayvon was a victim of racial profiling by the police. In other words,
was Trayvon targeted by Mr. Zimmerman because he was Black? Was Trayvon
treated differently by local law enforcement in their shooting
investigation because he was Black and the aggressor was White? Would
the police have acted differently with a White victim and a Black
aggressor?
The Department of Justice has the authority to investigate the
potential hate crime as well as whether this is a pattern or practice
of misconduct by local law enforcement in terms of applying the law
equally to all citizens and not discriminating on the basis of race.
Tom Perez is the Assistant Attorney General of the Civil Rights
Division of the Department of Justice. I want to make sure we have both
Federal and State investigations that ultimately prosecute offenders to
the fullest extent of the law as well as make any needed policy
changes, particularly to local police practices and procedures.
Trayvon's tragic death also leads to a discussion of the broader
issue of racial profiling. I have called for putting an end to racial
profiling, a practice that singles out individuals based on race or
other protected categories. In October of last year, I introduced
legislation--the End Racial Profiling Act, S. 1670--that would protect
minority communities by prohibiting the use of racial profiling by law
enforcement officials.
The bill would prohibit State and local law enforcement officials
from using race as a factor in criminal investigations, including in
``deciding upon the scope and substance of law enforcement activity
following the initial investigatory procedure.''
The bill would mandate training and provide grants on racial-
profiling issues and data collection by local and State law
enforcement.
Finally, the bill would condition the receipt of Federal funds by
State and local law enforcement on two grounds. First, under this bill,
State and local law enforcement would have to ``maintain adequate
policies and procedures designed to eliminate racial profiling.''
Second, they must ``eliminate any existing practices that permit or
encourage racial profiling.''
The legislation I introduced is supported by the NAACP, the ACLU, the
Rights Working Group, the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human
Rights, and numerous other organizations. I look forward to the April
18 advocacy day these civil rights groups are planning on Capitol Hill
to lobby on racial-profiling issues and raise awareness about this
issue and the legislation I have introduced.
Racial profiling is bad policy. Given the state of our budgets, it
also diverts scarce resources from real law enforcement. Law
enforcement officials nationwide already have tight budgets. The more
resources spent on investigating individuals solely because of their
race or religion, the fewer resources we have to actually deal with
illegal behavior.
Racial profiling has no place in modern law enforcement. The vast
majority of our law enforcement officers who put their lives on the
line every day handle their job with professionalism, diligence, and
fidelity to the rule of law. However, Congress and the Justice
Department can and should still take steps to prohibit racial profiling
and finally root out its use.
The 14th amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees equal
protection of the law to all Americans. Racial profiling is important
to that principle and should be ended once and for all. As the late
Senator Kennedy often said, ``Civil rights is the great unfinished
business of America.'' Let's continue to fight here to make sure we
truly have equal justice under law and equal protection of law as
guaranteed by our Constitution.
I yield the floor.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Senator from Tennessee.
____________________