[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 48 (Thursday, March 22, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S1995]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
INTENT TO OBJECT
Ms. MIKULSKI. Madam President, I intend to object to proceeding to
the 21st Century Postal Service Act, a bill to improve, sustain, and
transform the United States Postal Service, dated March 22, 2012.
I ask unanimous consent that a letter of March 20, 2012, sent by
myself to Majority Leader Reid, be printed in the Record.
There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in
the Record, as follows:
U.S. Senate,
Washington, DC,
March 20, 2012.
Hon. Harry Reid,
Majority Leader, U.S. Senate,
Washington, DC.
Dear Senator Reid: I write to notify you that I am putting
a hold on S. 1789, the Postal Reform bill, dated March 20,
2012. I will submit a copy of this notice to the Legislative
Clerk and the Congressional Record within 2 session days and
I give my permission to the objecting Senator to object in my
name.
While I absolutely agree that the United States Postal
Service (USPS) must be reformed to meet the country's needs
in the 21st Century, I must object to moving forward on
consideration of this legislation while the USPS continues a
rushed study to close a needed mail processing center on the
Eastern Shore of Maryland. Making matters worse, USPS plans
no public hearings and no opportunity for written comment in
this study process. This is totally unacceptable.
The half a million residents who live on the Eastern Shore
and rely on the mail service must have a voice in this
process. These residents include farmers, small businesses
and a significant rural and elderly population that relies
heavily on mail delivery for life saving medications, daily
newspapers, and important business documents.
The Easton area mail processing center is the only mail
processing center on the Eastern Shore of Maryland and its
ongoing operation is critically important to the economy of
the shore. Relaxing delivery standards by moving mail
processing from Easton to Delaware is simply not a practical
or sustainable option.
My constituents have a right to be heard, they have a right
to maintain the standard of delivery service that they
currently receive, and they deserve a fair and transparent
process for decisions about the Easton area mail processing
center.
I'm grateful for your leadership, and I look forward to
working with you to ensure that the Postal Service remains
financially solvent and ready for the 21st Century. But I
must object to consideration of S. 1789 while this issue
remains outstanding and I grant permission for you (or your
designee) to object in my name.
Sincerely,
Barbara A. Mikulski,
United States Senator.
____________________