[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 45 (Monday, March 19, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S1763-S1764]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
EXPORT-IMPORT BANK
Mr. REID. Mr. President, this week the Senate resumes debate on a
measure to improve innovators' access to capital. This bill passed the
House on a bipartisan vote and has President Obama's support. We could
make this legislation even better by passing the modest consumer
protections included in the substitute amendment we will consider
tomorrow. But Members of both parties agree we should pass it quickly.
We will finish work on this legislation this week.
It is nice to see Democrats and Republicans standing on common ground
for a change. But while this IPO proposal will be good for business--
helping to give startups the flexibility they need to hire and grow--
experts agree its impact on job creation will be limited. The IPO bill
is a good bill, but we all recognize its job creation impact will be
fairly limited.
We want to do something with this legislation to increase the amount
of jobs that will be forthcoming soon, which we have done. So as part
of this IPO bill, it is important Congress also reauthorize the Ex-Im
Bank, and do it now.
Reauthorization of the Ex-Im Bank will help American exporters
compete in a global economy and sell more of their products overseas.
Last year, Ex-Im Bank financing helped 3,600 private companies and
almost 300,000 jobs were added in more than 2,000 communities. That is
why the Ex-Im Bank has always enjoyed broad bipartisan support.
The last time this measure came before the body, it was offered by a
Republican Senator and was passed by unanimous consent. The
reauthorization legislation we will vote on tomorrow is also
bipartisan. It passed the Banking Committee unanimously. It has three
Republican cosponsors and the strong backing of the U.S. Chamber of
Commerce. Yet I read that some of my Republican colleagues don't want
to advance this bipartisan measure.
Remember, it does not increase the debt whatsoever. Instead, I have
been told that some Republicans want to start another drawn-out,
knockdown fight over a proposal that passed unanimously the last time
the Senate considered it. It doesn't make sense.
So let's review what is at stake. Unless Congress acts, Ex-Im Bank
may hit its lending limit this month. American exporters could no
longer rely on an even playing field with global competitors.
The Ex-Im Bank loans money to American businesses when private
lending is not available. Its investments made $41 billion in U.S.
exports possible last year alone. That is why Ex-Im Bank Chairman Fred
Hochberg says our competitors abroad ``are licking their chops'' at the
idea that America would stop backing businesses that sell their
products overseas.
Many of the businesses that are growing and hiring because of Export-
Import Bank financing are small businesses. But the men and women who
[[Page S1764]]
run large outfits such as Boeing, American Express, Johnson & Johnson,
Caterpillar, GE, and Motorola are also on record in supporting the Ex-
Im Bank.
American entrepreneurs can't afford Congress to give up on them now.
China already provides three to four times as much financing as we do
to help Chinese exporters. So we must help American exporters. We must
continue to give American businesses a fair shot to compete in a global
market. Since Ex-Im Bank doesn't add a penny to the deficit, there is
no excuse for Republicans not to support it. The nonpartisan
Congressional Budget Office says this commonsense legislation will
actually reduce the deficit by about $1 billion.
It is critical we pass the IPO bill to help businesses access
capital, but it is even more important we reauthorize the job-creating
Export-Import Bank which helps those companies compete abroad. This
proposal will support hundreds of thousands of more jobs in the small
business capital bill. Together it will be a real knockout. It will be
great for America.
Democrats brought this measure to the floor in an effort to find more
common ground, and passing it would be another major accomplishment of
which both parties can be proud.
____________________