[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 36 (Tuesday, March 6, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S1405-S1407]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
GAS PRICES
Mr. ISAKSON. Mr. President, I am glad to be able to come to the
floor. I wish to talk about a subject that was talked about to me a lot
during the Presidents Day break back in Georgia. I spent most of that
week traveling in my State, going to townhall meetings, listening to
Georgians from Savannah, GA, to Murray County, GA, and everywhere in
between. It was absolutely easy to tell what the No. 1 issue for the
average American or the average Georgia family is; that is, what the
price of gasoline is doing to their budget.
Gasoline prices continue to escalate. In fact, I have a Chevrolet
Silverado pickup truck that I use from time to time and I had to fill
it last weekend. It cost $78 to fill it, and it wasn't totally empty.
That is a big pricetag to fill a pickup truck. When I think of every
carpenter or farmer or landscaper or student taking their goods back to
school to their dormitory room and how much they have to pay for
gasoline to deliver those goods and services or that furniture, I
realize how harmful current gas prices are and I fear how high they are
going to go.
We need a comprehensive energy policy in the United States of
America. I was listening to the distinguished majority whip speak
before me. He made an interesting comment about the Keystone Pipeline.
He said, even if we approve the Keystone Pipeline, it would not do
anything for gas prices today. He is right because we have to build the
pipeline. But if we had approved it 2 years ago and it was operating,
we would have 700,000 barrels of petroleum more a day coming into the
United States. So to say that just because it would not be ready today
doesn't help gas prices is not keeping our eye on the ball.
What we have to recognize is, in the absence of a comprehensive
policy, in the absence of foresight, in the absence of putting all the
general items on the table that generate energy, we are putting off the
day in which the United States of America is energy independent.
Because we are not energy independent, then what goes on in Iran, in
the Strait of Hormuz, and in Venezuela affects the speculation on
gasoline and petroleum which affects the prices of gasoline in the
United States.
I am not one of these ``burn gas right and left, drill as much as you
can, fossil fuels are fine.'' I know we have problems with carbon. I
drive a hybrid vehicle, not because I am trying to drive a point but
because it makes sense. Anytime you can reduce carbon, that makes
sense. But you cannot eliminate it. You cannot eliminate it. What we
have to do is we have to put all sources of energy on the table. And
one of those is to continue to explore for gasoline and petroleum in
the domestic United States of America--off the Gulf of Mexico, off of
our coastline, in our national lands that we own where we know we have
shale oil and where we also know we have natural gas.
That exploration ought to be replete throughout the country, so we
are expanding our supply and reducing our dependence on foreign
imports. The best way to lower the price of gasoline in the future for
Georgians and for Americans is for the Congress of the United States
and the President of the United States to have a comprehensive energy
policy that embraces all forms of energy.
To the credit of the President, he approved not too long ago the loan
guarantees on reactors 3 and 4 at Plant Vogtle. They will be the first
nuclear reactors built in the United States of America since Three Mile
Island. Nuclear energy is a safe, reliable, carbon-free--carbon-free--
generation of energy. Every time we can expand our nuclear capability
we are lessening the pressure on domestic and foreign oil to be burned.
We know in the Haynesville shale and the Marcellus shale, which has
been discovered in Pennsylvania and Louisiana and Texas, that we have
gone from having a finite supply of natural gas to an infinite supply.
Yet, because there is some contest over whether hydraulic fracturing is
good or not good, we are not exploring that gasoline as we should or
that natural gas as we should. We should be exploring it as much as
possible, because it is a cleaner burning fuel than liquid petroleum
and gasoline. We ought to be doing renewable energy wherever it makes
sense. But we have seen renewable energy has its limits. We spent $6
billion a year subsidizing ethanol in hopes that it would have reduced
foreign imports, but it has not. It has had its own problems with two-
cycle engines. But ethanol has a place. It is scalable on the farm in
some cases. That is a good source of energy.
[[Page S1406]]
Solar is a good source of energy where it works. But it only works as
a supplement. It is not a primary supply or source. And wind, great.
But it is only great in the Midwest and down toward the Southwest. But
we ought to be using and encouraging it.
What we ought to be doing is encouraging all forms of exploration,
all forms of generation, and all of them domestically in the United
States of America. That will bring down gas prices.
The distinguished majority whip was right: It will not bring it down
today, because we have put off having an energy policy. But once we
finally develop an energy policy, and we stick to it, and we explore
all forms of renewable energy and all forms of fossil fuel and all
forms of coal, and we enhance nuclear, then we will have a plethora of
energy and we will have a lower price and less competition with foreign
oil and foreign petroleum, which is where the United States of America
needs to be.
Right now, we all realize what is going on in the Middle East is the
root cause of most of the increase in the cost of oil, because of
speculation. Every time we can improve our position and be free of
those influences is better for the United States of America and, most
importantly, it is better for the average citizens we all represent.
My message from the people I represent in Georgia, the ones I talked
to all during the Presidents Day recess and that week is: Do everything
you can to expand your supply of energy wherever you can find it. Take
us out of a dependence on foreign imports and get us independent of
foreign oil; that will bring down the price of oil. As a byproduct,
that will be in the best national security interests of the people of
the United States of America.
I yield the floor and suggest the absence of a quorum.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. BOOZMAN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Manchin). Without objection, it is so
ordered.
Mr. BOOZMAN. Mr. President, as February came to a close, it left
behind an unfortunate new record, $3.73 per gallon, the national
average, for unleaded gasoline, the highest ever recorded during this
month. Prior to this morning's drop of three-tenths of a cent, gas
prices had been on the rise for 27 straight days. In just 3 years, gas
prices have doubled, and they are not stopping there. Back home in
Arkansas, the average price of a gallon of regular gasoline is up over
25 cents from a month ago. Many analysts are predicting we will hit $4
a gallon by summer.
Think about what that does to the economy. For our small business
owners and farmers, it means much higher overhead. Those costs
ultimately get passed on to the consumers. In very dire cases, which
many of our small businesses are facing today due to reduced profit
margins, threats of higher taxes and increased regulations, high gas
prices could be the final straw.
It puts extra pressure on budgets of already cash-strapped local
governments. Just the other day I was reading a story from the
Booneville Democrat that documented the negative effects the price of
gas has on Logan County, AR. The county judge, Gus Young, noted if gas
prices reach $4, it is ``going to take away from the other things that
need to be done.''
In Blytheville, AR, which is a 300-mile trek from Booneville, those
same concerns are being voiced. In the Blytheville Courier News, former
mayor Barrett Harrison described how in recent years, despite efforts
to use more fuel-efficient vehicles and to cut down on idle time, the
city would still end up having to amend the budget at the end of the
year due to the high fuel costs.
For hard-working Arkansans, it is changing the way they live, and not
for the better. It is especially painful for our seniors and single
parents who live on fixed incomes. The high price of gas is one of the
top issues I am hearing about in letters, calls, and during my visits
across the State. I also recently posed the question about how the
rising price of gasoline in Arkansas is affecting them on my Facebook
page. I want to share a few of the responses I received.
Tim in Rogers, AR said, ``The more we have to pay for gas, the less
money we have for the other necessities and pleasures of life and
living.''
Melody in central Arkansas said it costs her family ``nearly sixty-
five dollars to fill up their truck'' and said they have limited their
driving to only their doctor in Hot Springs and the grocery store.
And it goes on from there. Many respondents said that it limits their
spending at places like the grocery store and will affect their
vacation plans. The overwhelming common thread in those responses is
that Washington needs to do something about the high cost of gas.
There is no denying that rising fuel prices are hurting Americans and
further complicating our efforts to revitalize the economy. There is
also no denying that we are not moving fast enough to address these
concerns. Americans want to know why, while their gas bills mount,
Washington still does not have an energy policy. It is past time that
we move forward on one and that begins with increasing our energy
production here at home.
We have the largest recoverable resources of oil, gas and coal of any
nation on the planet. America's recoverable resources are larger than
the combined supply of Saudi Arabia, China and Canada. Despite that, we
depend on hostile regimes--and nations that have agendas that are often
at odds with our own--for much of our oil.
The current tension between Israel and Iran only serves to make
matters worse. If Israel strikes Iran, there is a good chance that the
Iranians could attack Saudi Arabia's oil fields to retaliate against
the West.
It doesn't have to be this way. The Keystone XL Pipeline, Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge, ANWR, and drilling in the eastern Gulf of
Mexico alone would produce 3 million barrels of oil per day. The lack
of will in Washington to increase production here at home is
unnecessary. It is a literal road block. It prevents our economy from
picking up, increases the costs Americans pay for fuel, and it creates
an enormous liability for our national and economic security.
President Obama has said that increased domestic oil production is
unnecessary as he contends it is at the highest it has been in 8 years.
However, you only get those numbers by relying heavily on production on
private lands in North Dakota, Texas and Alaska. We simply are not
utilizing the resources we have been blessed with on public lands.
We can make a major dent in the problem simply by opening the Outer
Continental Shelf and ANWR to drilling in an environmentally
responsible way. The Outer Continental Shelf alone is estimated to
contain enough oil and natural gas to meet America's energy needs for
about 60 years. Energy exploration and production in ANWR would take
place on just a small portion of the 1.5 million-acre northern coastal
plain, yet will allow us to safely produce 900,000 barrels of oil per
day for the next 30 years. I have been there. I have seen firsthand
that this can be done in an environmentally safe way.
Similarly, the Keystone Pipeline would transport 700,000 barrels of
oil per day from Canada to U.S. refineries in the gulf coast. And it
too can be constructed and run in an environmentally safe manner.
Tapping into Canada's oil sands--one of the world's largest oil
reserves--would help ease our dependence on hostile regimes for oil. As
global demand for oil surges and the Canadians increase production, the
addition of the Keystone pipeline would allow us to get reliable and
secure oil from our largest trading partner and trusted ally.
Unfortunately, President Obama has punted on every opportunity we
have given him to move the Keystone Pipeline forward. That is why I am
supporting legislation to approve the project under Congress' authority
enumerated in the commerce clause. This same Congressional authority
was used to move the Alaska Pipeline forward 40 years ago, which has
dramatically increased the amount of oil produced here at home.
I have long supported legislation that puts a heavy investment into
researching wind, solar, hydrogen and other
[[Page S1407]]
technologies. These will ultimately ease our dependence on foreign oil
and gas. But we need relief now and American oil is necessary and
available.
For the foreseeable future, our economy will rely heavily on fossil
fuels. While we certainly need to encourage the market for alternative
energy sources, it has yet to be fully developed. But there is no
denying that by stalling domestic production, we create an unnecessary
burden on an already weak economy and are hurting our efforts to meet
our energy needs. We need to lift the moratorium on offshore oil
development, open ANWR for exploration and move the Keystone Pipeline
forward instead of further postponing the decision.
As I mentioned earlier, the people of Arkansas are demanding action
from Washington. They are frustrated by the higher totals that appear
on the receipts every time they go to fill up their gas tank. They are
tired of seeing more and more of their disposable income being eaten up
at the pump. Let's start providing them relief by increasing production
here at home.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from California.
Mrs. BOXER. What is the order at this time?
____________________