[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 25 (Wednesday, February 15, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S679-S682]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
SYNTHETIC DRUG USE
Mr. GRASSLEY. Mr. President, in the fall of 2010 I came to this
Chamber to speak about my growing concern of synthetic drug use in this
country.
Specifically, I raised concerns about a popular new drug known as K2,
or Spice, and I learned about this myself for the first time because a
constituent of mine by the name of David Rozga committed suicide. David
killed himself shortly after smoking a package of the drug he and some
friends bought at a local shopping mall.
At the time, David's death in June 2010 was one of the first
associated with what was a new and very dangerous drug craze. Nearly 2
years after David's death, the use of synthetic drugs like K2 has
exploded and is becoming a major problem across the country.
In 2009 the American Association of Poison Centers reported only 13
calls concerning synthetic drug use. One year later, in 2010, over
1,300 calls were made to poison centers about synthetic drugs. So I
have gone from 2009 to 2010, and now 2011. We have gone from 13 to
1,300 to last year, 12,000 calls to poison centers regarding synthetic
drugs.
The Monitoring the Future Survey, a survey of high school youth,
asked students for the first time last year if they ever tried
synthetic drugs. Roughly one in nine high school seniors responded they
used synthetic drugs last year.
These numbers are quite obviously an astonishing increase in just 2
years and they illustrate, of course, how rapidly the use of these
drugs has come on the scene. These drugs are having a terrible effect
on those who use them. Emergency room doctors across the country are
reporting increasing uses of synthetic drugs in the number of users
coming to the hospital.
My staff heard from one such doctor from upstate New York about what
she has seen. Dr. Sandra Schneider, from Rochester, NY, reported that
users in her ER experienced psychotic episodes, rapid heart rate, very
high blood pressure, and seizures. In some cases, users--many of whom
were in their teens and twenties--suffered heart attacks and strokes
and died as a result. Other cases involved users who tried to kill
themselves, harm others, or got into a car accident while high on these
synthetic drugs.
How do we get from practically no use to where we are now? The people
who manufacture and sell these drugs have circumvented the laws to
easily sell synthetic drugs online, at gas stations, in novelty stores
at the local shopping malls, and in tobacco stores and other shops.
Many of the drugs are manufactured overseas, in countries such as
China, and then imported into the United States. They spray chemical
compounds, that have not been tested on humans and were not intended
for human consumption, on dried leaves. They package and market these
drugs to appear as legitimate products such as incense, bath salts,
plant food, and snow remover. They slap a label on these packages
stating that the product is not for human consumption to get around FDA
regulations.
Over 30 States have passed laws to ban various synthetic drug
compounds. The Drug Enforcement Administration has also acted to stop
these drugs. Although the DEA has used its emergency scheduling powers
to control seven chemical compounds, there are too many on the market
now for DEA to go through the long and laborious process to schedule
each and every one. The makers of these drugs know this as well and
have altered their chemical formulas--some as little as a molecule--to
get around existing State and Federal laws.
This is exactly the case in my home State of Iowa. Iowa passed a law
last year that banned many chemical compounds. However, the law only
listed a specific set of chemical compounds and the drugmakers are now
altering their formulas.
Recently, two Iowa youths have become victims of the new drugs. One
is a Polk County teenager who got into a high-speed crash smoking a
product called 100 Percent Pure Evil.
This teen had two other passengers in her car. After smoking this
product the driver became agitated and stated she wanted to kill
herself. She started driving her car into several trees. When
paramedics arrived at the scene they reported that everyone was badly
hurt and the driver was vomiting blood. Thankfully all passengers
survived the crash.
Another teen in central Iowa experienced a near-death experience
after smoking the same product. This teen purchased the product--
remember the name, 100 Percent Pure Evil--purchased it at a local store
and started convulsing and vomiting shortly after smoking the drug.
Once a paramedic got this boy into the hospital he fell into a coma.
He, however, awoke from the coma the next day but had failed to
recognize his mother or grandmother at the hospital. Thankfully this
boy has since recovered his memory. Now he suffers occasional anxiety
attacks.
[[Page S680]]
When the boy's mother told the police about the product and where he
got it, she reported that the police told her there was nothing they
could do about it because it was not known what was in the product and
it may be legal. This product is still being reviewed to see if any
compounds fall under Iowa's law.
Nearly a year ago I introduced this legislation we named after the
person who died 2 years ago, David Rozga. I introduced this bill with
Senator Feinstein. It bans the chemicals that comprise K2/Spice. We
designed the legislation to capture a wide variety of compounds so it
would not be so easy to circumvent this law by altering the molecule.
In fact, the Iowa Governor's Office of Drug Control Policy is crafting
new legislation based on the legislation I introduced last year that
captures more substances. My legislation was unanimously passed out of
the Judiciary Committee 8 months ago. It is currently being prevented
from consideration by the full Senate by one Senator. The House of
Representatives passed its version of the Synthetic Drug Control Act
overwhelmingly last December, with over 70 percent of the
Representatives supporting scheduling these drugs.
Many of the opponents of this legislation stated on the House floor
that by scheduling these compounds we are preventing scientific
research. This is far from true. Any scheduled substance, even current
Schedule I drugs such as cocaine and heroin, can be researched. Any
scientist can apply to be registered by the DEA to research any drug.
Just because we are removing the drugs from the store shelves does not
mean we cannot study them.
I say to my colleagues, it is now time for the Senate to take action.
We cannot let the will of one Senator obstruct the will of many. I
believe if our legislation received a vote and a fair debate in this
body, it would pass overwhelmingly. So I urge my colleagues to support
our efforts to get these drugs off the store shelves and off the
streets, and I urge the Senate leadership to allow a debate and a vote
on the issue. The American people, people such as the Rozga family and
others who have been victims of these drugs, want to see this poison
removed from their communities.
I appreciate working together with the Senator from Minnesota and the
Senator from New York on this bill and similar bills as well.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Minnesota.
Ms. KLOBUCHAR. Mr. President, I come to the floor today to join my
colleague, Senator Grassley of Iowa. I thank him for his remarks. I
think you can tell this is a very important issue but also one that is
bipartisan. As he pointed out with the vote on the House side, this was
a bipartisan issue over there. It was bipartisan on the Judiciary
Committee. We simply need to allow for a debate and a vote in a timely
manner on these bills.
I also know Senator Chuck Schumer from New York will be joining us,
another senior member of the committee. We are all three on the
Judiciary Committee, with Senator Grassley being the ranking Republican
on the committee. So we have much support for this bill.
Today I want to take a few minutes to add to the comments of Senator
Grassley about the growing threat to people of all ages, but
particularly to our young people, of the dangerous synthetic drugs that
are becoming, sadly, more and more common in our communities.
There have been reports from States around the country of people
acting violently while under the influence of these drugs, leading to
deaths or injuries to themselves or to others. While taking these
drugs, people can experience elevated heart rates and blood pressure,
hallucinations, seizures, and extreme agitation. They are very
dangerous.
These synthetic drugs have exploded as an issue in recent years.
Until 2006 I was the county attorney for Hennepin County, which is
Minnesota's largest county. It actually is about a fourth of our State
in terms of the population. During that time two words I never heard
were ``synthetic drugs.'' We were focused on crack, we were focused on
methamphetamine, we were focused on laws to contain that, but synthetic
drugs were not something we talked about. It is an example of how
quickly this drug has come on the scene. Poison control centers and
emergency rooms from across the United States are reporting dramatic
increases in the number of calls and visits relating to synthetic
drugs. In 2011, poison control centers across America received more
than 13,000 calls about synthetic drugs. Think about that. Do you know
what the number was in 2010, a year before? It was 3,200; it was 3,200
in 2010, 13,000 in 2011. In Minnesota there was a total of 392 calls to
poison control relating to synthetic drugs in 2011, compared to 111 in
2010, so you are seeing a four-times increase in our State and across
the country in terms of the rise of this drug.
A recent report by the National Institutes of Health shows that one
in nine high school seniors admitted to using synthetic marijuana
during this past year, so it is clearly a rapidly growing problem.
This all hit home in my State with the tragic death of 19-year-old
Trevor Robinson in Blaine, MN, who overdosed on a synthetic
hallucinogen known as 2C-E. Last year another young man shot himself in
our State under the influence of synthetic drugs. I can only imagine
the pain and anguish their friends and families must feel. It is
anguishing. This is a life-and-death issue. It is not something where
we can put our head in the sand and pretend it is not happening. This
is a new type of drug, it is a dangerous drug.
We have begun to take action. We have to take action on both the
State and Federal level and we are making progress on a few fronts. I
introduced a bill which would add 2C-E, the drug that killed the young
man in my State, and similar drugs to a list of banned substances so
they will be treated in the same manner as other banned drugs that they
mimic, such as heroin.
I am also cosponsor of the bill Senator Grassley referenced and also
Senator Schumer has another bill to ban other types of synthetic drugs.
Basically one bans the bath salts, one is focused on synthetic
marijuana, and my bill is on the synthetic hallucinogens. All three of
these bills passed the Judiciary Committee in July and one has already
passed the House with a very strong vote.
Unfortunately, as Senator Grassley also mentioned, a hold has been
placed on all three of the Senate bills by one Senator. That is
extremely unfortunate. These drugs can kill, and if we do not take
action they are going to become more and more prevalent and put more
and more people at risk. We cannot wait around and let these important
bills languish in procedural gridlock, especially because of one
Senator.
We are going to keep fighting here in the Senate until those laws get
passed. We have seen in Minnesota, with the tragic story of Trevor
Robinson, what these drugs can do and I for one do not want to see it
happen again, not in my State, not anywhere in the country. I
understand the Senator who is holding these bills has genuine and
philosophical opposition and he deserves to be heard on his objections.
My suggestion is that we come to an agreement so we can have a period
of debate on these bills, a simple period of debate. This should not be
a week-long debate. We can take the floor and speak to this issue and
he can speak as long as he likes. We are not asking him to change his
position. We want him to be heard but we simply want to have a period
of debate and then a vote. That is what the Senate should be about.
Luckily, the Drug Enforcement Administration is taking its own action
and has temporarily banned some synthetic drugs, but most of the
substances in these bills have not been banned, including all of the
substances in my bill. On the State level, roughly 40 States have
banned some synthetic drugs, including Minnesota, where a major law
regarding synthetic drugs took effect in July. But that means that some
States have not banned any of these drugs yet and some have banned only
certain types, so people can go to other States to buy them legally or
buy them on the Internet. That is one of the reasons we need this
Federal law.
Also, local law enforcement needs a strong ally in the Federal
authorities as they try to turn the tide against synthetic drugs.
Sadly, many of these instances I have seen in our State with
[[Page S681]]
synthetic drugs involve more rural communities--towns that may not have
the ability to call in a bunch of lab technicians and experts to be
able to testify about what type of synthetic drug it is. That is why,
for the sake of that law community, it is important we get it on that
Federal list and we also make it very clear it is banned. Passing a
Federal law will help create a partnership and will send a strong
message that we need to eradicate these substances.
I do think we have made progress by raising awareness of this issue,
which will lead to better education efforts, more vigilance by parents,
and more attention by law enforcement. Now that the DEA has become more
familiar with these substances, it will be better equipped to combat
the problem. But the fact remains that the most important thing we can
do on the Federal level is to pass these three bills that have already
been approved unanimously by the Judiciary Committee. These bills won't
solve the problem overnight, but they are the first step we need to
take, and we need to do it now. Before we lose more kids, before these
drugs spread any further, let's pass these bills. As I mentioned, it is
estimated that one in nine high school seniors has tried synthetic
marijuana. I don't want to wake up a year from now and read that it has
increased to one in seven or one in five. Let's have a debate. Let's
hear what the objections are, and then let's pass these bills. I really
think we can save lives. While there is still time to catch up, we
should be doing everything we can to address these problems.
I thank my colleagues, Senator Grassley, the ranking Republican
Senator from Iowa on the Judiciary Committee, who has already spoken,
and Senator Chuck Schumer from New York, who is a senior member of the
Judiciary Committee. We are doing this as a team. We think it is very
important that you, Mr. President, and the rest of the Senate have the
opportunity to vote on these bills and have the opportunity to debate
them. We hope we can achieve this goal procedurally so we can move
forward in the way we are supposed to.
I yield the floor. I note the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
The Senator from New York.
Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, today I rise to join my colleagues,
Senator Klobuchar and Senator Grassley, to discuss an epidemic
overtaking our country: synthetic drugs. I wish to compliment both of
my colleagues. Each of us has been working on this issue in different
ways, and we combined our three approaches into one piece of
legislation that will go a long way toward helping to keep our kids
away from drugs they should not have.
Synthetic drugs are an epidemic overtaking our country. They are also
known as bath salts or, in the case of manmade marijuana, spice or
incense. They are given innocent names, but they are deadly. Synthetic
drugs are not sold on street corners by slingers who keep stashes
hidden in alleys. Instead, these drugs can be found in local corner
stores across the country. They are as easy to buy as a lollipop or a
carton of milk, but they are much more dangerous.
No wonder emergency rooms and poison control centers have seen an
enormous rise in patients who have taken these drugs and must seek
help. The numbers are nothing short of eye-popping. Poison control
centers reported 13 calls concerning these products in 2009, over 1,000
calls in 2010, and over 6,500 in 2011--from 13 calls to over 6,500
calls in 2 years. For every call they get, there are many people taking
these drugs with no call at all. One survey, in fact, indicates that
one in nine high school seniors used synthetic drugs in the past year.
That is a frightening, astounding, and devastating number.
The Senate has before it a rare opportunity to do something simple
and right that will actually go a very long way to fixing this crisis.
We have three bills--Senator Klobuchar's, my colleague from Minnesota,
Senator Grassley's, my colleague from Iowa, and mine--that would place
the chemical components that make up these substances directly on
schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act without waiting for the DEA
to go through its yearlong listing process. Our communities desperately
need us to make these drug compounds illegal once and for all. The DEA
wants us to go ahead and make them illegal, and so does the FDA. There
is no legitimate or commercial use for these compounds.
Our bills passed out of the Judiciary Committee unanimously and with
no opposition. The House passed its version of our bills with little
opposition. All we have to do now is put them on the floor and have a
vote or simply pass them unanimously. But one of my colleagues has put
a hold on these bills--just one. That is fine. I am in favor of
protecting my colleague's rights, as they are my rights and Senator
Klobuchar's and Senator Grassley's rights. But one Senator should not
be able to prevent a vote on something that 99 percent of Americans
want that directly affects their health and safety and the health and
safety of their children. So I have a suggestion. Why can't we at least
put these bills on the floor, and our colleague can air his opposition
and see if he can win people over to his point of view? This really
should not take more than an hour or two of our business.
Law enforcement and health professionals are begging for this bill. I
know for a fact that parents and families in my State are begging for
this to become law. A lot of us have worked hard on this issue because
it is of critical importance to our communities and States.
Before I go any further, I again want to compliment and commend my
colleagues, Senators Klobuchar and Grassley, as well as Senator
Feinstein, who is not here with us this afternoon, for their excellent
leadership on banning these so-called designer drugs.
On Monday I was in Rochester, NY, to discuss Senator Grassley's
synthetic marijuana bill with local law enforcement and emergency room
doctors. I heard horrific stories of patients who smoked synthetic
marijuana and ended up crazed in the emergency room. Everyone I met
with urged me to help ban these substances as soon as possible.
My own bill, the Combating Dangerous Synthetic Stimulants Act, bans
two more of these drugs, mephedrone and methylenedioxypyrovalerone--
fortunately, it is regularly known as MDPV--and they are commonly sold
as bath salts. By calling them bath salts, manufacturers are trying to
deliberately mislead people into thinking they are an everyday product.
It is despicable when young kids--14, 15, 16 years old--try bath salts
and they think it is harmless. These dangerous drugs are sold in
convenience stores and smoke shops for as little as $14 to $40. And
what are their names? Tranquility, Zoom, White Lightning, and Hurricane
Charlie. These so-called bath salts or plant foods are nothing more
than deadly narcotics, and they are being sold cheaply to all comers
with no questions asked at store counters around the country. How is it
possible that such deadly drugs are legal? Because by marketing them as
bath salts, which aren't for human consumption, they aren't regulated.
These bath salts have much the same effects, according to users, as
cocaine or ecstasy, but they are preferred because they are cheaper and
more readily accessible. In fact, according to court papers obtained by
the Staten Island Advance, one of our fine local papers in New York, a
seller in Brooklyn boasted to a Federal agent that the bath salts would
deliver a better high than cocaine.
This ease of access does not, however, translate into their safe use.
A recent New York Times article reported that an individual high on
bath salts had climbed a roadside flagpole and jumped into traffic,
broken into a monastery and stabbed a priest, and scratched herself to
pieces because something was under her skin.
One of these drugs, Cloud 9, is so easily accessible it is sold on
amazon.com. A person can go on amazon.com and buy this horrible stuff.
How much? Sixteen dollars, plus shipping. It is accessible to anybody.
Can my colleagues guess what item most customers buy
[[Page S682]]
with this specific bath salt? Is it relaxing candles or lotion? Is it
soap? No. The item customers most buy with this bath salt is Click N
Smoke all In One Vaporizer With Wind Proof Torch Lighter. That is the
name of the product. One does not need much of an imagination to
believe that the purchasers of Cloud 9 are smoking these drugs and not
adding them to a relaxing bath.
These drugs are the worst kind. Not only do they cause people to
perform horrible actions, but they also give the impression that they
are legal, that they are innocuous. Make no mistake that these drugs
can and will cause harm to their users. At least 30 States, including
my home State of New York, have recognized these drugs as harmful. They
have banned bath salts at the State level. But only the DEA--the Drug
Enforcement Agency--and the resources that are behind it can keep these
drugs from coming into our country, from crossing State lines, and from
morphing time and again to evade State bans. That is why we need these
bills.
The DEA temporarily banned two of these substances in November.
However, the clock is now ticking until this temporary ban ends. FDA
and HHS must complete a complicated checklist in the remaining 7 months
to prevent these drugs from returning to the corner store.
We must provide the DEA with a permanent ban before the time runs
out. This will provide them with the necessary tools to address these
legal drugs on a national stage. The DEA has the ability to spearhead
multi-State and international investigations to prevent the manufacture
and sale of bath salts.
These drugs are deadly and dangerous. Yet they are easier to buy than
cigarettes in many States. Parents should not worry that each time
their child goes into a convenience store or gas station, he or she can
buy a deadly drug.
This bill has broad bipartisan support. We cannot wait for another
parent to lose a child because of the inaction of the Senate. I look
forward to working with my colleagues to pass the legislation. Once
again, I implore my colleague--the single Senator who is holding up
this bill--I hope he will not agree to set aside his differences, which
come from a deep Libertarian ideological perspective that is different
than most Americans have, but agree not to block them but to debate
them and let them come up for a vote.
I thank the Chair.
I yield the floor and note the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Cardin). The clerk will call the roll.
The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. PORTMAN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. PORTMAN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to enter into a
colloquy with my Republican colleagues for up to 30 minutes.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________