[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 19 (Monday, February 6, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S331-S332]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
BOILER MACT
Mr. BOOZMAN. Mr. President, I come to the Senate floor to discuss an
important action this Congress can take to protect manufacturing jobs
and strengthen our economy.
Specifically, I encourage Senate conferees on the payroll tax bill to
include projobs bipartisan language--such as H.R. 2250 or S. 1392--that
would address the EPA's proposed rule on maximum achievable control
technology standards for boilers, also known as boiler MACT.
Fixing boiler MACT is important because if the EPA gets it wrong, it
will cost tens of thousands of good-paying blue-collar manufacturing
jobs. These regulations will be one more unnecessary weight dragging
down our economy and making life harder for low- and middle-income
families.
Fixing boiler MACT is important also because Congress should provide
clarity and certainty to the rulemaking process. The process has been
plagued by complications, administrative stays, court orders, and
numerous other stops and starts.
For example, employers spent hundreds of millions working to comply
with the 2004 boiler MACT rules only to be told they must now spend
billions more. The boiler MACT legislation should be included in the
payroll tax relief legislation which is intended to provide some help
to our sluggish economy by allowing Americans to keep a little more of
the money they earn. By addressing boiler MACT on this bill, we can
further protect jobs--especially manufacturing jobs--and prevent our
country from having to absorb one more sudden regulatory punch in the
gut.
Fixing boiler MACT is important because our economy is weak and
families are struggling. Last week, the nonpartisan Congressional
Budget Office predicted a weak and perilous economic situation for the
next couple years. We see continued high unemployment, including
estimates that the unemployment rate will tick up to 8.9 percent this
year and 9.2 percent next year. We see projections of $1.2 trillion
deficits. On top of all this, we have learned that the GDP growth
slowed to just 1.7 percent last year.
I hope these troubling projections are wrong, but given what we know,
we should be focused on encouraging job growth and opportunity.
American families are counting on us. We should not stifle businesses
that want to expand and create jobs. One way to help is to provide some
regulatory certainty and to allow employers the time they need to
adjust to new, burdensome regulations.
The boiler MACT fix would provide the EPA an additional 15 months to
prepare appropriate, justified, and achievable regulations for
industrial boilers. Without this time, EPA will be forced to rush the
rules out the door only a few weeks after they will receive hundreds of
substantive comments and new data on boiler performance.
The boiler MACT fix would also give employers a little extra time to
comply with the rules once they are finalized. This is vital because it
will minimize job losses that would occur if employers had to rush to
implement the new rules. The rules are very expensive and spreading the
cost out over a couple extra years will make it less likely that
employers will have to lay off employees.
In Arkansas alone, boiler MACT will cost over $230 million and put
3,600 jobs at risk. These are real jobs and real people. I shake their
hands and I hear their serious concerns when I visit communities such
as Pine Bluff, AR, or Howard County, AR. In our State, the proposed
boiler MACT rules will especially harm the employers with units that
burn solid fuels such as biomass. The boiler MACT would help by stating
that materials such as renewable biomass that have been used for fuel
for decades should remain classified as fuel and not reclassified as
solid waste.
We should be encouraging the use of renewable biomass, not
discouraging it. Sending biomass to a landfill makes absolutely no
sense when we can use it to power our industries and create jobs. The
potential harm to renewable, carbon-neutral biomass is very bad for
Arkansas. But it is not just our rural States with significant biomass
that will be harmed; boiler MACT will hit all States, large and small,
rural and urban.
For example, in Pennsylvania it will cost over $751 million and put
over 12,000 jobs at risk. In Montana it will cost $32 million and put
over 500 jobs at risk. In Maryland it will cost over $195 million and
put over 3,100 jobs at risk. In Rhode Island it will cost over $19
million and put hundreds of jobs at risk. In Wyoming it will cost over
$155 million and put over 2,400 jobs at risk.
Some of the hardest hit States include North Carolina, Ohio,
Michigan, Indiana, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, Wisconsin, Virginia,
Illinois, and Minnesota. Several States will see more than 12,000 jobs
put at risk. In Arkansas, the expense and uncertainty created by these
rules will force some employers to scale back. Other employers
[[Page S332]]
may be able to keep existing jobs but decide that it does not make
sense to hire new employees while they face these mounting regulatory
costs. Given these serious concerns, the boiler MACT fix will provide
clarity and give businesses a reasonable timeframe to comply. The
boiler MACT legislation passed the other body with bipartisan support
from 275 Congressmen. In the Senate this legislation has the support of
a strong bipartisan majority.
Over the last four decades our country has cleaned our air by
reducing emissions that cause serious threats--threats to human health
and to the environment. I strongly support appropriate, science-based
protection for clean air, and we must continue to protect the
environment.
The public will continue to support appropriate protections for clean
air, especially if this Congress takes a reasonable approach and gives
the EPA the time it needs to develop rules that are achievable and that
can be implemented in a timeline that will protect important
manufacturing jobs throughout our country. For these reasons I urge the
Senate conferees on the payroll tax bill to include the boiler MACT
fix. I also ask my colleagues to let the conferees know how important
this issue is. Together, we can help create opportunities and protect
these important, high-paying manufacturing and other blue collar jobs.
Mr. President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. KYL. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent the order for the
quorum call be rescinded.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, it is so
ordered.
____________________