[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 16 (Wednesday, February 1, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S237-S238]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
COLLEGE COSTS
Mr. DURBIN. Madam President, too many Americans are out of work. We
know that. Without a steady income, it is hard for families to stay
current on their monthly expenses. We have all talked about the
consequences of losing a job. When I meet with the unemployed in
Illinois, one of the first things we talk about is health insurance
because that is one of the first casualties. It is very difficult if
not impossible for someone unemployed to maintain COBRA payments once
they are out of work. They deplete their savings and find themselves in
a very vulnerable position. Some fall behind on mortgage payments. More
than 4 million families have lost their homes since the housing crisis
began in 2008. Another 10.7 million Americans own mortgages that are
underwater--the homeowner owes more than the home is worth.
One of the major mortgage banking associations in Washington, DC,
recently had a short sale of their headquarters building in Washington.
They went underwater. They could not pay their mortgage, and they ended
up selling. It is happening not just to businesses, obviously, but to a
lot of homeowners.
It is hard to keep up with these basic expenses. A lot of people who
used to donate to food banks are now in line at food banks. According
to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, one out of six Americans really
has a food issue. They are hungry at the highest level since the
government started taking these numbers in 1995.
But there is another obligation, a financial obligation that needs a
little more focus here in Washington. Private student loan debt is
becoming the biggest burden for families across America. Student loan
debt in October of 2010 for the first time in our history surpassed
credit card debt in America. At public universities, the average debt
for a graduating student was $20,200. At private nonprofits, it was
$27,650. For students at for-profit colleges, the debt burden is even
greater. Students at for-profit colleges graduated with an average debt
of $33,000. More than three out of four young adults say that college
has become harder to afford in the past 5 years. Almost as many say
that graduates have more student debt than they can possibly manage.
There are few penalties for schools whose students incur huge amounts
of debt when the student cannot repay their loan.
How did we reach this point? Two trends have led to this phenomenal
level of student loan debt:
First, the for-profit college industry has grown by leaps and bounds
over the last decade. It is the fastest growing sector of higher
education. Three numbers put it in perspective. Ten percent of students
out of high school end up in for-profit schools, yet for-profit schools
consume 25 percent of all the Federal aid to education and account for
44 percent of student loan defaults. What is the obvious conclusion?
These for-profit colleges are drawing in more student loan assistance
from the Federal Government than their counterparts in the public and
nonprofit area, and their students, deep in debt, cannot find jobs to
pay off their debts and default on their loans.
Second, the cost of college is so far out of reach for most people
that they exhaust their ability to borrow from the government and end
up taking out private loans. Private loans are not federally
guaranteed. The issuer is not required to work with you to consolidate
the loans or restructure them in the future. If that sounds familiar,
that is because many of the banks issuing these loans are the same
banks holding your mortgage. Even more outrageous, the loans are
protected in bankruptcy. What that means is, unlike other loans we
would incur in our lives that we might bring into a bankruptcy court in
[[Page S238]]
desperation, these loans cannot be discharged in bankruptcy. These
loans will trail the borrowers to the grave. Student loan decisions
made at the age of 19, 20, and 21 years end up being a lifetime of
responsibility.
Yesterday the president of a small, very good college in Illinois
said that so many students she meets with who are interested in going
to school are debt-dumb; they do not even understand debt as it might
affect them today and tomorrow. Unfortunately, these for-profit
schools--and many others--are taking advantage of students with little
or no life experience who end up, many times, with their parents
signing for student loan debt that is unconscionable, at levels they
will never be able to repay in any reasonable time, and often, when it
comes to for-profit schools, for worthless diplomas if the student is
lucky enough to finish.
One of my constituents, Hannah Moore, recently contacted my office
regarding her outstanding student debt. I wanted to bring this to the
attention of the Senate. In 2007, Hannah graduated with a bachelor of
arts from a for-profit school called the Harrington College of Design.
It was part of the Career Education Corporation's program. When Hannah
graduated in 2007 from the Harrington College of Design, her student
debt was $124,570.
After she exhausted all her Federal student loan options, she turned
to private loans when she wanted to finish and get a degree. At first
she tried to manage her payments of close to $800 a month by working
three jobs. Her Federal loan is a reasonable payment because she signed
up for the income-based repayment program, but the private loan demands
are unreasonable. When the payments became unmanageable, she tried to
work out a plan with her lender. They refused. She said that she speaks
to her lender about once a month asking for assistance, with no help.
When it became apparent she would not be able to afford the payments,
her family offered to help. Her dad, who had retired, got a job just to
help his daughter make her student loan repayments. Dad went back to
work, out of retirement. Her parents spend their time stressing over
her loans with her.
Hannah is 30 years old. She wants to be independent, but her student
debt of over $124,000 is making that impossible. With the help of her
family, dad going back to work and all she can do, she makes her
monthly payments, but her life is still very much on hold. She said,
``My education doesn't feel rewarding, it's a burden right now.'' When
asked how her student loan debt is affecting her life, she said: I
can't start a family, can't buy a house, I can't even buy a car. She
rides her bike to work. Think about that. She went to college, she
stuck with it, and she graduated with a degree of no value and $124,000
in student debt.
She is not alone. Every week I hear from constituents who are seeking
relief, and I invite them to come to my Web site and tell me their
stories about student loan debt in America.
Last week, in his State of the Union, the President spoke about a
plan to keep the cost of higher education from going even further. His
proposal will provide better information to families, while enlisting
colleges and State governments to partner with the Federal Government
to keep costs down while improving student outcomes.
To make sure students and families have accurate information, the
President has proposed creating a college scorecard for all
institutions of higher education--all of them. The scorecard will
provide families with clear, concise information about affordability
and student outcomes--how many students go to this school and finish,
how many who finish with a degree get a job. It is a pretty basic
question. Then students and their families can make a good choice. They
will not be overwhelmed by the spam and ads tossed at them on the
Internet.
The plan would reward schools that give value, serve low-income
students, and set reasonable tuition policies. These schools would be
rewarded with additional campus-based aid so more students can attend
college.
The President's proposal also builds on the success of the current
Race to the Top Program by creating a new Race to the Top Program
rewarding college affordability and completion that will promote change
in State systems of higher education. This Race to the Top challenge
will incentivize Governors and State legislatures around the Nation to
join us in keeping tuition costs down.
Following the President's challenge to keep college costs down, the
Senate HELP Committee is holding hearings this week on college
affordability. I thank them for that. It is long overdue, and I look
forward to working with Senators Harkin and Enzi on this issue.
A hearing we had just a week or so ago in Chicago on the abuse of the
GI bill education rights by for-profit schools should be a wake-up call
to every Member of Congress. Holly Petraeus, the wife of General
Petraeus, testified. She works at the Consumer Financial Protection
Bureau, an agency that is in the news. It is controversial because the
appointment of its Director, Richard Cordray, was announced by the
President by executive appointment when the Senate refused to give him
an opportunity to serve.
The Senate refused to break a filibuster on Mr. Cordray, even though
I heard no speeches criticizing his ability. The speeches criticized
the agency, which some Republicans loathe and despise, but it is in the
law and it should be given a chance to work. Those who are critical of
it should meet with Holly Petraeus, General Petraeus's wife. She is
working with military families trying to stop the abuses of for-profit
schools under the GI bill. That is something on which we should all
join together, Democrats and Republicans alike. Americans who serve in
the military are entitled to not only the GI bill but to institutions
of learning that give them a chance to take their time in school and
turn it into a much better life for themselves and their families.
I hope we can come together on the question of affordability and on
taking a close look at many of these institutions of higher learning
that are, unfortunately, defrauding many innocent children, families,
and veterans who are returning from conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Madam President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. LIEBERMAN. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the
order for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________