[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 16 (Wednesday, February 1, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S233-S234]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
SCHEDULE
Elizabeth MacDonough
Mr. REID. Mr. President, as the Presiding Officer and all Senators
should understand, we have a new sheriff in the Senate now. And we wish
Elizabeth MacDonough well. She is certainly well qualified for this
job. She has proven that in the decade she has been here, her fairness
and astuteness of Senate rules. Let everyone understand that a new boss
is in the Senate now.
This morning, following any leader remarks, the Senate will be in a
period of morning business for 1 hour. The Republicans will control the
first half and the majority will control the final half. Following
morning business, we will resume consideration of the STOCK Act.
The STOCK Act
Mr. President, it is my understanding that the Republicans are going
to have a luncheon today. I hope they discuss what they want to do here
on the Senate floor. Last night we had a situation where two of our
fine Senators, Mr. Lieberman and Ms. Collins, who have a reputation of
being fair and bipartisan, did their best to work through some
amendments, to set up votes on them, and they couldn't do it because we
had Senators who offered amendments that had nothing to do with this
bill--nothing. But Republican Senators said they would not allow a vote
on germane and relevant amendments until they were guaranteed a vote on
their nongermane amendments. So that is not a good situation, and we
cannot legislate in that fashion. It is one thing to offer an amendment
that is not germane, but to demand a vote on it out of order before any
other amendments? So the minority has to make a decision whether they
want to legislate or have people give speeches all day that have
nothing to do with the legislation.
I hope the leadership and the Senators generally on the other side of
the aisle will work together to help us move this piece of legislation
out of here. It is an important piece of legislation. We were told it
is bipartisan. Only two Senators voted against breaking the filibusters
so we could start debating this bill.
Spending
The Republicans in Congress often claim they are the only thing
standing against a wave of deficit spending. But where were these
Republicans when President Bush pushed for trillions in unpaid tax cuts
for the rich? Where were they? They were right here in Congress, that
is where. So instead of pointing the finger at us, Republicans should
examine their own track record of extravagant spending: a prescription
drug plan, unpaid for; two unpaid wars; tax breaks for the rich, unpaid
for. And they were paid for--borrowed money, money borrowed from
American taxpayers. Trillions of dollars. In fact, President Bush's tax
cuts were the single largest contributor to the ballooning budget
deficits during his administration. There were plenty of others, but
that was No. 1. And no one benefited from these tax breaks more than
billionaires and millionaires. Tax breaks for the richest Americans
piled nearly $1 trillion on our debt over the last decade. The tax bill
was far more than that, but that is just people making more than $1
million a year.
Yesterday the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office released a
report showing that these tax cuts will continue to push deficits to
unsafe levels. We know that, but in addition to doing that, what it
does is it makes the poor
[[Page S234]]
poorer, the rich richer, and squeezes the middle class every day.
Extending the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans--people making
more than $1 million a year--would add another $1 trillion to the
deficit over the next decade. We can no longer afford to bankrupt our
Nation to give more tax breaks to people who do not need them. People
are putting up accounts in the Cayman Islands, stashing money in
Switzerland.
Republicans are right about one thing: We do have a deficit problem
in this country. And there are two ways to ease this crisis. We could
cut more jobs for teachers, firefighters, police, and Federal
employees. We could cut Social Security and Medicare benefits for
seniors after a lifetime of hard work. We could put off repairing our
crumbling roads, bridges, and schools. We could continue to let our
schools fall into disrepair and our students fall further behind. We
could continue talking about what really does not matter.
The House keeps talking about bills they have passed that create
jobs. Everyone, every pundit who has looked at those knows it is just a
subterfuge. They want to cut regulations, and that would make people
sicker, that would make our air dirtier and our water less pure and our
food less safe. That is what they are doing to create jobs.
The other way to cut spending would be to take care of those
unnecessary tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires.
So this is the choice we face: cutting the heart out of America or
having the richest of the rich contribute just a little bit to the
problems we have in America today as it relates to spending. The choice
we face should not be a very difficult choice.
This country has limited resources, and we must use those resources
wisely. Investing in the middle class is a wise use of those resources.
When you put money back in the pockets of the middle class, they spend
it. They spend it on groceries and gas and buying new cars, paying
their mortgages, paying their rent, maybe repairing their family car,
or spending it to fix the roof on their house that has become
dilapidated. That spending boosts business, spurs hiring, and helps the
economy. Rigging the tax system to favor the richest of the rich does
not do that. Rigging the system does not create jobs. It does not spur
growth. It is not a wise use of our resources.
____________________