[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 12 (Thursday, January 26, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S118-S120]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                            A SECOND OPINION

  Mr. BARRASSO. Mr. President, I come to the floor today, as I have 
week after week ever since the President's health care law was passed, 
to bring a doctor's second opinion about the health care law.
  I traveled the State all the last week in Wyoming talking to people 
about the things they look for in a health care law, which is what they 
want as patients, as citizens. What they are looking for is the care 
they need from a doctor they want at the price they can afford. Across 
the board, they do not believe they are getting that with the health 
care law that was passed in this body and then in the House and signed 
by President Obama during the last couple of years of the 
administration.
  It is interesting, as we went to the floor of the House in the House 
Chamber this past week for the President's State of the Union speech, 
it was almost 7,000 words, and he focused very little on the health 
care law.
  One might say: Well, why is that? Well, it seems pretty obvious it is 
because that law was unpopular when it was passed, and it is actually 
more unpopular with the American people today than it was the day it 
was passed. The more people find out about it, the less popular 
it becomes.

  Even the White House understands this law is deeply flawed, it is 
extremely unpopular, and it actually makes it harder for small 
businesses to create jobs. So when the President wants to talk about 
job creation in America, he realizes his health care law isn't helping, 
and it is actually making it worse.
  I had townhall meetings in different communities around Wyoming last 
week, where you gather a group of people together. My colleagues ought 
to do the same in their own communities and their home States and ask 
the group of people: Do you believe, under this health care law--you 
remember, the one the President promised that if passed that the cost 
of your insurance would go down? Do you remember that law? Do you 
believe that after that was passed, that your health care costs will 
actually go up? How many believe the cost of your care will go up and 
your insurance will go up? Every hand went up.
  Then ask those same people, who now say they are going to end up 
paying more: Do you think the quality--because there is a lot of 
discussion about quality and access and concerns about care. Do you 
believe the quality of your care will go down? Again, the hands went 
up.
  So we have people who are saying: We are going to be paying more and 
getting less, and that is not what I want.
  So today I am here to discuss something about the health care law 
that the President did leave out of his big speech on Tuesday night, 
and that is the issue of waivers.
  On January 6, while we were all back in our home communities, many 
people talking to folks around their home States--on January 6, while 
Congress was not in session, the House was not in session, the Senate 
was not in session--the administration ended their program that has 
been a major embarrassment to the Obama administration. Month by month, 
the President has had to announce that he had to issue more and more 
waivers from his health care law, waivers that the President granted to 
unions, to businesses, and to insurers. Each and every waiver served as 
a clear admission that the health care law, as written, didn't get the 
job done and doesn't work.
  Well, as of January 6, 2012, the administration has issued a total 
number of waivers that covers more than 4.1 million Americans. Over 
1,700 waivers were given covering more than 4.1 million Americans.
  Now, interestingly, of all of those people, a very small percentage 
of workers in this country are union workers. Yet over half of all the 
waivers given, 2.2 million of those people were those who are covered 
with union insurance. So we have 4.1 million Americans given waivers. 
So 2.2 million people with union insurance got a waiver; that is, 54 
percent of all of the waivers went to union employees who supported the 
health care law. These are the people who were out in the streets 
rallying, saying: We want the health care law. They have it on their 
Web sites. They had celebrations when it was passed.
  Then, do you remember what Nancy Pelosi said? First, you have to pass 
it before you get to find out what is in it. As all these people 
getting their insurance through unions found out, if they complied with 
the law as written it would break their policies, break their programs, 
and they said: We cannot afford to have this law apply to us. Please 
give us a waiver. And 2.2 million people with union insurance got a 
waiver. As they say, they let the word out January 6, 2012, while 
Congress was not in session and while people were focused on other 
things.
  The rest of America's small business owners were not so lucky. A new 
poll from the Chamber of Commerce found that 78 percent of small 
businesses surveyed reported that taxation, regulation, and legislation 
from Washington made it harder for their businesses to

[[Page S119]]

hire more workers. These are the small businesses of the country, the 
people who are the job creators. In that same poll, 74 percent of small 
business owners said the recent health care law makes it harder for 
their business to hire more employees.
  Now, aren't these the very people we are asking to go out and hire 
more workers to get America back to work? Yet the President's and 
Democrats' health care law is making it harder for 74 percent of small 
businesses in this country to hire more employees.
  So how did we get here?
  Well, in May of 2011 I came to the Senate floor, right here, and 
explained that the waiver recipients, under the way it worked, had to 
reapply because they were getting annual benefit waiver limits year 
after year after year. Realizing what an embarrassment this drip, drip, 
drip of new waivers was going to be by the administration, in August of 
2011 the administration switched course. The Department of Health and 
Human Services announced at that point that if people wanted a waiver, 
they were going to have to apply for a final waiver that would carry on 
all the way through 2014--a 3-year waiver. They wanted to get all of 
this out by the beginning of 2012 so it wouldn't be a continued 
election year embarrassment for this President, this administration, 
and those who voted for it. This scheme allowed the administration to 
dodge issuing more waivers leading up to the 2012 Presidential 
election.
  It is clear these waivers were going to be an election year 
embarrassment for the President. They are an embarrassment because each 
and every waiver was yet another reminder to the American people that 
President Obama's health care law wasn't working.
  The President promised, and we remember hearing him loudly and 
clearly: If you like the health insurance plan you have, then you can 
keep it. Well, what he meant was, to keep the coverage you have, if you 
like it, you may need a waiver from Washington.
  I also want to talk for a moment about what happens now that this 
September deadline has passed and these 4 million waivers have been 
granted.
  It is now no longer possible to apply for an annual benefit limit 
waiver. It is no longer an option for business owners in this country. 
So that means it leaves hard-working Americans who want to start a new 
business forced to choose between two options. I think they are bad 
options.
  One, they can offer high-cost, government-approved health insurance. 
Well, that is going to make it very expensive for them to try to open a 
new business and hire workers. The expense of opening that business may 
likely be too great. So those jobs are not created, and unemployment 
rates stay high. No. 2, they could not offer coverage at all because 
they cannot afford the health care law's onerous mandates. If they 
chose that second option, what happens ultimately? The American 
taxpayers will end up footing the bill.

  With a $15 trillion debt and unemployment hovering around 8.5 
percent, the last thing we should do is adopt policies like this health 
care law and then this waiver that discourage America's best and 
brightest from starting new companies and hiring new workers. But that 
is exactly what President Obama's health care law does. It stifles 
innovation, strangles the market, and it saddles the American people 
with more debt.
  This is just another example showing how the President's health care 
policies are making the situation worse. His policies are hurting 
America's economy. His policies are making the standard of living in 
America worse. His policies are making health care in America worse. 
His policies are making America's debt worse.
  Almost immediately after President Obama signed this health care bill 
into law, the employers around the country began to sound the alarm. 
They said the health care law's annual benefit limit policy would force 
them to stop offering health insurance to hundreds of thousands of 
Americans and their families. That is why the administration came up 
with this waiver idea. Nowhere in the health care law is the Secretary 
of Health and Human Services granted explicit authority to start an 
annual benefit limit waiver program--nowhere in the law. What the 
administration should have done is come to Congress and ask for help to 
fix the problem they had created. That would mean, however, the 
President and Washington Democrats would have to admit their health 
care law was flawed.
  Washington Democrats crafted policy mandating that everyone must buy 
government-approved health insurance. In many cases, it is insurance 
these individuals do not need, do not want, and cannot afford. The 
President pushed his mandates on the American people without 
understanding how limited health insurance products work in the 
marketplace. The administration simply ignored the fact that many 
employers cannot afford to offer the Cadillac health insurance coverage 
to their workers that the government is mandating.
  Now, if those businesses do not have a waiver already, they will not 
be able to offer their employees any insurance coverage at all, and new 
business startups will not have the opportunity to ask for a waiver. 
Those employers might have wanted to offer some basic level of health 
insurance coverage to their new employees, but thanks to the Obama 
administration they will not be able to offer anything at all because 
of the expense.
  This is just another example of Washington Democrats pushing a one-
size-fits-all, ``we know best'' policy where they think they know what 
is best for all of the people of this country. How many more 
disruptive, ticking timebombs are there lurking in this health care 
law? We do not know because many of the provisions do not even go into 
effect until 2014 or later. That is why I come to the floor week after 
week giving a doctor's second opinion, to mention and to tell that I 
intend to fight each and every day to make sure the American people 
will never have to find out, come 2014.
  I am committed more than ever to repealing the health care law, 
repealing it and replacing it with health care reforms that help 
American families get the care they need from a doctor they want at a 
price they can afford.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The majority leader.
  Mr. REID. Mr. President, this is not the time for a debate with my 
friend, the distinguished Senator from Wyoming. I would just say there 
are two sides to the story. Try to have my friend, the Senator from 
Wyoming, explain to Jeff Hill, a young man who, within 2 weeks after 
turning age 24--he had to go off his parents' insurance when he turned 
23--got testicular cancer. His parents had to spend money they didn't 
have, borrow money they didn't have to take care of the problems this 
young man developed with testicular cancer, all the surgery, radiation, 
all the other chemo he had. Try to have him explain to the more than 2 
million seniors who have been able to have wellness checks as a result 
of this law we passed. How about the people in Nevada who have come to 
me with tears in their eyes, explaining to me that their daughter or 
son now has the ability to have insurance because they cannot be denied 
insurance because of a preexisting disability.
  That is why we have seen this litigation which has been generated, 
and the appellate courts by a 3-to-2 margin have favored the law, 
including a brilliant decision written by an extremely conservative 
judge, Judge Silberman in the DC Court of Appeals, who upheld this law. 
That is why many consumer groups have joined in the appeal to the U.S. 
Supreme Court, along with the pharmaceutical industry, along with the 
insurance companies--because this is something that is good for the 
American consumer.
  That is why it was so unfortunate that the Republicans blocked 
something that would help consumers after the financial wizardry that 
took place on Wall Street that basically tore down the economies of so 
many different States. When we passed the Dodd bill, we wanted to make 
sure consumers were protected. That is why we tried for months and 
months to have someone selected to fill that spot.
  Republicans said: We do not like the law. We like him, but we don't 
like the law, so we do not want the law effectuated, so we are not 
going to approve him. And they did not. That is why President Obama, 
under the terms of the Constitution that is written to protect this 
country, has in that Constitution the power of recess appointments.

[[Page S120]]

That is what he did to protect the consumer.
  The health care law we passed protects the consumer.

                          ____________________