[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 195 (Saturday, December 17, 2011)]
[Senate]
[Page S8760]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AND VETERANS AFFAIRS, AND RELATED AGENCIES
APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2012--CONFERENCE REPORT--Continued
The PRESIDING OFFICER. There is now two minutes of debate prior to a
vote on the conference report to accompany H.R. 2055.
Mr. INOUYE. Mr. President, this Omnibus appropriations bill
represents a victory for compromise, a victory for American taxpayers,
and a victory for bipartisanship. It is fiscally responsible and it
provides the necessary guidance to our agencies so they will be able to
fulfill their vital missions on behalf of the American people. It meets
every requirement of the Budget Control Act and contains not a single
earmark; 149 Democrats and 147 Republicans voted in favor of this bill
yesterday. Clearly it is a strong bipartisan bill and I urge a ``yes''
vote.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Who yields time?
Mr. REID. Mr. President, this will be the last rollcall vote of this
year.
Have a happy holiday, everyone.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The question is on the adoption of the
conference report to accompany H.R. 2055.
Mr. BARRASSO. I ask for the yeas and nays.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second?
There appears to be a sufficient second.
The clerk will call the roll.
The assistant legislative clerk called the roll.
Mr. KYL. The following Senator is necessarily absent: The Senator
from Kentucky (Mr. Paul).
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Are there any other Senators in the Chamber
desiring to vote?
The result was announced--yeas 67, nays 32, as follows:
[Rollcall Vote No. 235 Leg.]
YEAS--67
Akaka
Alexander
Baucus
Begich
Bennet
Bingaman
Blumenthal
Blunt
Boozman
Boxer
Brown (MA)
Brown (OH)
Cantwell
Cardin
Carper
Casey
Chambliss
Cochran
Collins
Conrad
Coons
Durbin
Feinstein
Franken
Gillibrand
Graham
Hagan
Harkin
Heller
Hoeven
Hutchison
Inouye
Isakson
Johanns
Johnson (SD)
Kerry
Klobuchar
Kohl
Landrieu
Lautenberg
Leahy
Levin
Lieberman
Manchin
Menendez
Merkley
Mikulski
Murkowski
Murray
Nelson (NE)
Nelson (FL)
Pryor
Reed
Reid
Roberts
Rockefeller
Schumer
Shaheen
Stabenow
Tester
Udall (CO)
Udall (NM)
Warner
Webb
Whitehouse
Wicker
Wyden
NAYS--32
Ayotte
Barrasso
Burr
Coats
Coburn
Corker
Cornyn
Crapo
DeMint
Enzi
Grassley
Hatch
Inhofe
Johnson (WI)
Kirk
Kyl
Lee
Lugar
McCain
McCaskill
McConnell
Moran
Portman
Risch
Rubio
Sanders
Sessions
Shelby
Snowe
Thune
Toomey
Vitter
NOT VOTING--1
Paul
The PRESIDING OFFICER. On this vote, the yeas are 67, the nays are
32. Under the previous order requiring 60 votes for the adoption of the
conference report to accompany H.R. 2055, the conference report is
agreed to.
The majority leader.
Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, today I cast my vote against H.R. 2055,
the nine-bill appropriations measure. I opposed this package because
the process put forward by the majority was woefully inadequate given
the seriousness of the issues involved. Valuable legislative time was
wasted this year on political messaging votes; time that could have
been more properly devoted to the nuts and bolts of legislating. The
full Senate, for example, was denied the opportunity to consider the
Defense Appropriations bill at a time when our men and women in uniform
are facing looming uncertainty over out-year funding.
Despite my overall opposition to this measure, I would note that
there are several provisions that I am in favor of in this package. As
always, I support funding for the brave members of our military and for
our veterans. Indeed, I voted for the Senate version of the Military
Construction/VA appropriations bill earlier this year and just a few
days ago voted for the final version of the Defense Authorization bill.
Among the other provisions I support are policy riders such as those
that encourage a culture of life and that rein in government overreach.
In closing, it is unfortunate that the majority continues to operate
as it has. I am hopeful that the majority's efforts in this regard do
not presage further legislative shortcuts on matters of national
importance in the second session of this Congress.
____________________